본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

광대역 하이브리드 기법과 지반응답 해석을 통한 낙동강 삼각주 지역의 가상지진 지반운동 시뮬레이션

Ground Motion Simulation of Scenario Earthquakes in the Nakdonggang Delta Region using a Broadband Hybrid Method and Site Response Analysis

정석호|오준수|김재휘
한국지진공학회|2024.09|한국지진공학회논문집 (Jorunal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea)|제28권 제5호|pp. 233-247|DOI https://doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2024.28.5.233

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Seismic designSite response analysisInput ground motionBroadband hybrid ground motion simulation
주제분류토목공학

초록

The damage to structures during an earthquake can be varied depending on the frequency characteristics of seismic waves and the geological properties of the ground. Therefore, considering such attributes in the design ground motions is crucial. The Korean seismic design standard (KDS 17 10 00) provides design response spectra for various ground classifications. If required for time-domain analysis, ground motion time series can be either selected and adjusted from motions recorded at rock sites in intraplate regions or artificially synthesized. Ground motion time series at soil sites should be obtained from site response analysis. However, in practice, selecting suitable ground motion records is challenging due to the overall lack of large earthquakes in intraplate regions, and artificially synthesized time series often leads to unrealistic responses of structures. As an alternative approach, this study provides a case study of generating ground motion time series based on the hybrid broadband ground motion simulation of selected scenario earthquakes at sites in the Nakdonggang delta region. This research is significant as it provides a novel method for generating ground motion time series that can be used in seismic design and response analysis. For large-magnitude earthquake scenarios close to the epicenter, the simulated response spectra surpassed the 1000-year design response spectra in some specific frequency ranges. Subsequently, the acceleration time series at each location were used as input motions to perform nonlinear 1D site response analysis through the PySeismoSoil Package to account for the site response characteristics at each location. The results of the study revealed a tendency to amplify ground motion in the mid to long-period range in most places within the study area. Additionally, significant amplification in the short-period range was observed in some locations characterized by a thin soil layer and relatively high shear wave velocity soil near the upper bedrock.

Abstract

The damage to structures during an earthquake can be varied depending on the frequency characteristics of seismic waves and the geological properties of the ground. Therefore, considering such attributes in the design ground motions is crucial. The Korean seismic design standard (KDS 17 10 00) provides design response spectra for various ground classifications. If required for time-domain analysis, ground motion time series can be either selected and adjusted from motions recorded at rock sites in intraplate regions or artificially synthesized. Ground motion time series at soil sites should be obtained from site response analysis. However, in practice, selecting suitable ground motion records is challenging due to the overall lack of large earthquakes in intraplate regions, and artificially synthesized time series often leads to unrealistic responses of structures. As an alternative approach, this study provides a case study of generating ground motion time series based on the hybrid broadband ground motion simulation of selected scenario earthquakes at sites in the Nakdonggang delta region. This research is significant as it provides a novel method for generating ground motion time series that can be used in seismic design and response analysis. For large-magnitude earthquake scenarios close to the epicenter, the simulated response spectra surpassed the 1000-year design response spectra in some specific frequency ranges. Subsequently, the acceleration time series at each location were used as input motions to perform nonlinear 1D site response analysis through the PySeismoSoil Package to account for the site response characteristics at each location. The results of the study revealed a tendency to amplify ground motion in the mid to long-period range in most places within the study area. Additionally, significant amplification in the short-period range was observed in some locations characterized by a thin soil layer and relatively high shear wave velocity soil near the upper bedrock.

참고문헌 (59)

  1. Korea Meteorological Administration (KMA), "Domestic Earthquake List", ~
  2. Sun CG, "Seismological and geotechnical characteristics of the 12september 2016 Gyeongju earthquake", The Magazine of The KSCE, 65(4), pp.14~19 (2017)
  3. Lee CH, "Comparative analysis of structural damage potentials observed in the 9.12Gyeongju and 11.15 Pohang earthquakes", J Earthq Eng Soc Korea, 22(3), pp.175~184 (2018)
  4. Kim JC, "Damage investigation of pilotis structures and analysis of damage causes by Pohang earthquake", Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Structure & Construction, 35(3), pp.3~10 (2019)
  5. Oh SH, "Correlation Analysis of Gyeongju Earthquake Waveform and Structural Damage Scale", Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Structure & Construction, 32(12), pp.33~44 (2016)
  6. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (MOLIT), "Korea Seismic Design Standard (KDS 17 10 00)", Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, ~ (2018)
  7. Yoon JG, "Evaluation of earthquake ground motion considering dynamic site characteristics in Korea", J Earthq Eng Soc Korea, 8(3), pp.23~32 (2004)
  8. Sun CG, "A proposition of site coefficients and site classification system for design ground motions at Inland of the Korean Peninsula", Journal of the Korean Geotechnical Society, 21(6), pp.101~115 (2005)
  9. Oh HJ, "Microzonation of Sejong city area based on site amplification generated by pohang-type seismic waves", Journal of The Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation, 22(6), pp.263~271 (2022)
  10. Jeong CG, "Selection of input earthquake motion for dynamic analysis", Korean Geo-Environmental Conference, pp.187~195 (2009)
  11. Kim HK, "Generation of synthetic ground motion in time domain", LHI Journal of Land, Housing, and Urban Affairs, 1(1), pp.51~57 (2010)
  12. Park DH, "Current practice and recommendations for improvements of seismic design of free-field site and soil structures", Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineering, 67(6), pp.34~43 (2019)
  13. NGA-East:Median ground-motion models for the Central and Eastern North America region, "Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER)", PEER, ~, pp.PEER Report No. 2014 (2015), 05
  14. Goulet CA, "M NGA-East ground-motion characterization model part I: Summary of products and model development", Earthquake Spectra, 37(1_suppl), pp.1231~1282 (2021)
  15. Mai PM, "Hybrid broadband ground-motion simulations : Combining long-period deterministic synthetics with high-frequency multiple S-to-S backscattering", Bull Seismol Soc Am, 100(5A), pp.2124~2142 (2010)
  16. Song SG, "Pseudo-dynamic earthquake source modeling, current status and prospect", Journal of the Geological Society of Korea, 58(4), pp.541~548 (2022)
  17. Razafindrakoto HN, "Broadband ground‐motion simulation of the 2011 Mw 6.2 Christchurch, New Zealand, earthquake", Bull Seismol Soc Am, 108(4), pp.2130~2147 (2018)
  18. Dupuis M, "Progress towards hybrid broadband ground-motion simulation of megathrust earthquakes on the Hikurangi subduction zone", Canadian Conference - Pacific Conference on Earthquake Engineering (2023)
  19. Hartzell S, "Calculation of broadband time h istories o f ground m otion : C omparison of m ethods a nd validation using strong-ground motion from the 1994 Northridge earthquake", Bull Seismol Soc Am, 89(6), pp.1484~1504 (1999)
  20. Denolle MA, "Strong ground motion prediction using virtual earthquakes", Science, 343(6169), pp.399~403 (2014)
  21. Bradley BA, "Ground motion selection for simulation-based seismic hazard and structural reliability assessment", Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 44(13), pp.2321~2340 (2015)
  22. Bradley BA, "Guidance on the utilization of earthquake-induced ground motion simulations in engineering practice", Earthquake Spectra, 33(3), pp.809~835 (2017)
  23. Lee RL, "Hybrid broadband ground motion simulation validation of small magnitude earthquakes in Canterbury, New Zealand", Earthquake Spectra, 36(2), pp.673~699 (2020)
  24. Graves RW, "Broadband time history simulation using a hybrid approach", Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, (1098) (2004)
  25. Graves RW, "Broadband ground-motion simulation using a hybrid approach", Bull Seismol Soc Am, 100(5A), pp.2095~2123 (2010)
  26. Graves RW, "Refinements to the Graves and Pitarka(2010)broadband ground-motion simulation method", Seismol Res Lett, 86(1), pp.75~80 (2015)
  27. Kim BM, "Recent trends of Ground Response Analysis", Geotechnical Engineering, 36(6), pp.66~72 (2020)
  28. Yoon JG, "Development of site classification system and modification of design response spectra considering geotechnical site characteristics in Korea(II)-Development of site classification system", J Earthq Eng Soc Korea, 10(2), pp.51~62 (2006)
  29. Kramer SL, "Geotechnical earthquake engineering" (1996), Prentice Hall International Series
  30. Jeong CG, "Verification of frequency-dependent equivalent linear method", Journal of the Korean Geotechnical Society, 24(12), pp.113~120 (2008)
  31. Matasovic N, "Seismic response of composite horizontally-layered soil deposits", Ph.D, pp.1993
  32. Groholski DR, "Evaluation of 1-D non-linear site response analysis using a general quadratic", hyperbolic strength-controlled constitutive model, 2015, ~
  33. Groholski DR, "Simplified model for small-strain nonlinearity and strength in 1D seismic site response analysis", J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, 142(9), pp.04016042~ (2016)
  34. Shi J, "From stiffness to strength : Formulation and validation of a hybrid hyperbolic nonlinear soil model for site-response analyses", Bull Seismol Soc Am, 107(3), pp.1336~1355 (2017)
  35. Campbell KW, "NGA ground motion model for the geometric mean horizontal component of PGA, PGV, PGD and 5%damped linear elastic response spectra for periods ranging from 0.01 to 10s", Earthquake Spectra, 24(1), pp.139~171 (2008)
  36. Ryu CK, "Late quaternary paleoenvironmental changes in the Western Nakdong River delta", J Geo Soc Korea, 26(5), pp.443~458 (2005)
  37. Ryu CK, "Late Quaternary depositional environmental change in the northern marginal area of the Nakdong River delta", J Geo Soc Korea, 47(3), pp.213~233 (2011)
  38. Ham AR, "Late Quaternary depositional environmental changes from the middle part of Nakdong River delta core sediments", J Geo Soc Korea, 54(1), pp.47~59 (2018)
  39. Yoo DG, "Stratigraphic evolution of the Nakdong River valley in response to late Quaternary sea-level changes", Mar Geol, 427, pp.106243~ (2020)
  40. Kim JH, "Characterization of deep shear wave velocity profiles in the Gimhae Plains using the microtremor array method", Journal of the Korean Geotechnical Society, 38(8), pp.17~27 (2022)
  41. Kim JH, "Characterization of dynamic site properties in the Gimhae Plains using the microtremor array method and the horizontalto-vertical spectral ratio method", MS, pp.2023
  42. Kim, SK, "The guidelines for designing vertical drain boards in deep soft ground", Geotechnical Engineering, 30(5), pp.15~24 (2014)
  43. Yoo DG, "Stratigraphy and depositional history of Nakdong River Delta", J Geo Soc Korea, 53(5), pp.619~630 (2017)
  44. Kim J, "The Relationship between Bedrock depth and site fundamental frequency in the Nakdonggang delta region, South Korea", Geotechnics, 3(3), pp.550~560 (2023)
  45. Lee K, "Discussions on the September 2016 Gyeongju Earthquakes", Geophysics and Geophysical Exploration, 20(3), pp.185~192 (2017)
  46. Kim S, "Assessment of tectonic activity using geomorphic indices along major faults in SE Korea", J Geo Soc Korea, 59(2), pp.247~265 (2023)
  47. Okada A, "Active Fault Topography and Trench Survey in the Central Part of the Yangsan Fault, Southeast Korea", J Geogr, 103(2), pp.111~126 (1994)
  48. Kyung JB, "Active fault study in the central part of the Yangsan Fault, southeastern part of Korea", Geological Society of Korea 50th Anniversary int’l Symp, pp.33~38 (1997)
  49. Yang JS, "Quaternary fault activity of the Yangsan Fault zone in the Samnam-myeon, Ulju-gun, Ulsan, Korea", Economic and Environmental Geology, 47(1), pp.17~27 (2014)
  50. Kwon O, "A study on the characteristics of fault activity in the southern part of the Ulsan fault using paleoseismic method", J Geo Soc Korea, 57(2), pp.109~121 (2021)
  51. Lee K, "A study of microearthquake activity of the Yangsan fault", The Journal of the Geological Society of Korea, 19(3), pp.127~135 (1983)
  52. Kyung JB, "Paleoseismological study and evaluation of maximum earthquake magnitude along the Yangsan and Ulsan Fault Zones in the Southeastern Part of Korea", Geophysics and Geophysical Exploration, 13(3), pp.187~197 (2010)
  53. Choi SJ, "Estimation of possible maximum earthquake magnitudes of Quaternary faults in the southern Korean Peninsula", Quat Int, 344, pp.53~63 (2014)
  54. Leonard M, "Earthquake fault scaling : Self-consistent relating of rupture length, width, average displacement, and moment release", Bull Seismol Soc Am, 100(5A), pp.1971~1988 (2010)
  55. Leonard M, "Self-consistent earthquake fault-scaling relations : Update and extension to stable continental strike-slip faults", Bull Seismol Soc Am, 104(6), pp.2953~2965 (2014)
  56. Scholz C, "The Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting" (2002), Cambridge University Press
  57. Jo ND, "Estimation of spectrum decay parameter k and stochastic prediction of strong ground motions in southeastern Korea", J Earthq Eng Soc Korea, 7(6), pp.59~70 (2003)
  58. Kim KH, "Crustal structure beneath the southern Korean Peninsula from local earthquakes", Geophys J Int, 209(2), pp.969~978 (2017)
  59. Kim S, "Forward waveform modelling procedure for 1-D crustal velocity structure and its application to the southern Korean Peninsula", Geophys J Int, 185(1), pp.453~468 (2011)

관련 논문AI추천

인공합성 지반 운동을 활용한 낙동강 삼각주 지역의 지진 시나리오 기반 액상화 평가김재휘, 오준수, 정석호한국지진공학회 · 한국지진공학회논문집2025 · 제29권 제1호지진공학 실무 활용을 위한 한국형 광대역 하이브리드 지반운동 시뮬레이션김재휘, 정석호, Bae, Sung Eun, Bradley, Brendon A.한국지진공학회 · 한국지진공학회논문집2025 · 제29권 제1호2016년 경주지진 원인단층의 시나리오 지진에 의한 국내 광역도시 지진관측소에서의 추계학적 강진동 모사최호선한국지진공학회 · 한국지진공학회논문집2021 · 제25권 제6호추계학적 지진동 모사에서 유한단층 모델의 민감도 분석이상현, 이준기한국지진공학회 · 한국지진공학회논문집2024 · 제28권 제3호2016년 경주지진 유발단층 시나리오 지진에 의한 국내 광역 도시 지진관측소에서의 강진동 모사최호선한국지진공학회 · 한국지진공학회논문집2020 · 제24권 제2호점지진원 모델을 이용한 경주 지진으로 인한 지반운동생성지현우, 하성진, 한상환한국지진공학회 · 한국지진공학회논문집2016 · 제20권 제7호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)

전단파 속도가 중저층 철근콘크리트 구조물의 지진 응답에 미치는 영향이창석, 김병민, 김민선, 전종수pp. 249-255기계학습 기반 노후 철근콘크리트 건축물의 축력허용범위 산정 방법오근영, 신지욱, 강재도, 황희진pp. 257-266부식된 철근의 부착강도 및 정착길이 산정모델한선진, 이득행pp. 267-274기계학습기반 기둥 파괴유형 분류모델을 활용한 학교건축물의 내진보강전략 구축최인섭, 신지욱, 김수빈pp. 275-283지진취약도 곡선 생성시 선택된 지진파 수에 따른 입력변수 변화에 관한 연구서동우, 박상기, 김재환, 박기태, 정규산pp. 285-294
원문 보기