KDS 41 17 00에 따라 설계된 저층 필로티 건물의 지진취약도
Seismic Fragility of Low-rise Piloti Buildings Designed According to KDS 41 17 00
2
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The 2017 Pohang earthquake caused severe damage to low-rise piloti buildings. The damage was caused mainly by column shear failure, and some core walls were as well. The damaged piloti buildings in Pohang City could be relieved if they were designed correctly according to the standards at that time. However, the post-earthquake investigation revealed design, construction, and permission problems. To solve the problems, the Piloti Building Structure Design Guidelines that include strict specifications were published in 2018. Separately, KDS 41 17 00, the seismic design standard for buildings, was enacted in 2019 and it included the guideline contents. Therefore, at least after the publication of the guidelines, piloti buildings, designed by the standard and guidelines, can be expected to possess better seismic performance than existing piloti buildings. To confirm this, the probability of exceedance for several damage state thresholds was estimated for existing and designed piloti buildings. As a result, the probability of damage of designed piloti buildings was very low compared to existing ones. Consequently, it was confirmed that the guideline and standard adequately supplement the structural fragility of existing piloti buildings.
Abstract
The 2017 Pohang earthquake caused severe damage to low-rise piloti buildings. The damage was caused mainly by column shear failure, and some core walls were as well. The damaged piloti buildings in Pohang City could be relieved if they were designed correctly according to the standards at that time. However, the post-earthquake investigation revealed design, construction, and permission problems. To solve the problems, the Piloti Building Structure Design Guidelines that include strict specifications were published in 2018. Separately, KDS 41 17 00, the seismic design standard for buildings, was enacted in 2019 and it included the guideline contents. Therefore, at least after the publication of the guidelines, piloti buildings, designed by the standard and guidelines, can be expected to possess better seismic performance than existing piloti buildings. To confirm this, the probability of exceedance for several damage state thresholds was estimated for existing and designed piloti buildings. As a result, the probability of damage of designed piloti buildings was very low compared to existing ones. Consequently, it was confirmed that the guideline and standard adequately supplement the structural fragility of existing piloti buildings.
참고문헌 (13)
- Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, "The Regulations on Standards, etc. for Housing Construction", ~ (2020)
- Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, "Korean building code-structural", ~ (2005)
- Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, "A study on establishment of earthquake disaster prevention measures for piloti-type buildings" (2018)
- Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, "Guideline for structural design of piloti-type buildings", ~ (2018)
- Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, "Korean building code-structural", ~ (2016)
- Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, "Seismic design code for buildings (KDS 41 17 00)", ~ (2019)
- Kim J, "Seismic fragility function for existing low-rise piloti-type buildings reflecting damage from Pohang earthquake", In press, ~ (2021)
- Computers and Structures, Inc, "Perform-3D, Ver. 6.0", ~
- Korea Authority of Land and Infrastructure Safety, "Seismic performance evaluation and rehabilitation guidelines of existing buildings", ~ (2019)
- ASCE, "Seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing buildings (ASCE", SEI 41-13), 2013
- Applied Technology Council, "PEER", ATC-72-1, Modeling and acceptance criteria for seismic design and analysis of tall buildings, 2010
- Vamvatsikos D, "Incremental dynamic analysis", Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 31, pp.491~514 (2002)