지진의 이중산입에 대한 소고(小考)
A Note on the Earthquake Double Counting
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
As a result of active geological investigation of faults in Korea, many Quaternary faults have been identified and some of them were judged to have potential to generate earthquakes. Those faults need to be considered as additional seismic sources in the seismic hazard analysis. When a fault is introduced as a new source, the earthquakes generated by the fault should be removed from the area sources that include any part of the fault, to avoid double counting. In practice, however, double counting cannot completely be avoided as the complete separation of the fault-generated earthquakes from the area sources is impossible due to uncertainties related to the earthquake location, subsurface structures of faults, etc. When a new fault source is introduced, the only constraint is the invariance of earthquake frequency. The maximum earthquake and the Richter-b value should also be subject to change, but there are no competent approaches to estimate the change due to incomplete separation of earthquakes. To gain insight into the effect of a new fault source, an example calculation of the seismic hazard were carried out. The example calculation shows that addition of a new fault source centers seismic hazard around the fault source.
Abstract
As a result of active geological investigation of faults in Korea, many Quaternary faults have been identified and some of them were judged to have potential to generate earthquakes. Those faults need to be considered as additional seismic sources in the seismic hazard analysis. When a fault is introduced as a new source, the earthquakes generated by the fault should be removed from the area sources that include any part of the fault, to avoid double counting. In practice, however, double counting cannot completely be avoided as the complete separation of the fault-generated earthquakes from the area sources is impossible due to uncertainties related to the earthquake location, subsurface structures of faults, etc. When a new fault source is introduced, the only constraint is the invariance of earthquake frequency. The maximum earthquake and the Richter-b value should also be subject to change, but there are no competent approaches to estimate the change due to incomplete separation of earthquakes. To gain insight into the effect of a new fault source, an example calculation of the seismic hazard were carried out. The example calculation shows that addition of a new fault source centers seismic hazard around the fault source.
참고문헌 (23)
- "Research and development of active fault of Korea Peninsula" (2022)[URL]
- Nuclear Safety and Security Commission, "Siting criteria for the nuclear reactor facilities. Notice No. 2017-15", ~ (2017)
- Ornthammarath T, "Probabilistic seismic hazard assessments for Northern Southeast Asia (Indochina):Smooth seismicity approach", Earthquake Spectra, 36(SI), pp.69~90 (2020)
- Peñarubia H, "Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis model for the Philippines", Earthquake Spectra, 36(SI), pp.44~68 (2020)
- Rong Y., "A probabilistic seismic hazard model for Mainland China", Earthquake Spectra, 36(SI), pp.181~209 (2020)
- Petersen MD, "2021 US national seismic hazard model for the State of Hawaii", Earthquake Spectra, 38(2), pp.865~916 (2022)
- Rivas-Medina A, "Approach for combining fault and area sources in seismic hazard assessment:application in south-eastern Spain", Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci, 18, pp.2809~2823 (2018)
- Anderson JG, "Consequences of slip rate constraints on earthquake occurrence relations", Bull. Seism. Soc. Am, 73(2), pp.471~496 (1983)
- Youngs RR, "Implications of fault slip rates and earthquake recurrence models to probabilistic seismic hazard estimates", Bull. Seism. Soc. Am, 75(4), pp.939~964 (1985)
- Thatcher W, "Temporal evolution of continental lithospheric strength in actively deformin regions", GSA Today, 18(4), pp.4~11 (2008)
- Murray JR, "Slip rates and spatially variable creep on faults of the northern San Andreas system inferred through Bayesian inversion of global positioning system data", Jour. Geophy. Res. Solid Earth, 119(7), pp.6023~6047 (2014)
- Ghione F, "A hybrid probabilistic seismic hazard model for Northeast India and Bhutan combining distributed seismicity and finite faults", Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 123, pp.1~18 (2021)
- Maximum likelihood recurrence intervals for California paleoseismic sites, "Biasi GP", United States of Geological Survey, ~, pp.Open File Report 2013-1165 (2013)
- Pisarenko VF, "Statistical estimation of seimsic hazard parameters: maximum possible magnitude and related parameters", Bull. Seism. Soc. Am, 86(3), pp.691~700 (1996)
- Kijko A, "Estimation of the maximum earthquake magnitude, m max", Pure and Applied Geophysics, 161(8), pp.1655~1681 (2004)
- 노명현, "A parametric estimation of Richter-b and mmax from an earthquake catalog", Geosciences Journal, 18(3), pp.339~345 (2014), 한국지질과학협의회[DOI]
- Wells DL, "New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement", Bull. Seism. Soc. Am, 84(4), pp.794~1002 (1994)
- Hanks TC, "A bilinear source-scaling model for M-logA observations of continental earthquakes", Bull. Seism. Soc. Am, 92(5), pp.1841~1846 (2002)
- Hanks TC, "M-logA observations for recent large earthquakes", Bull. Seism. Soc. Am, 98(1), pp.490~494 (2008)
- Shaw BE., "Constant stress drop from small to great earthquakes in magnitude-area scaling", Bull. Seism. Soc. Am, 99, pp.871~875 (2009)
- Stafford PJ, "Source-scaling relationships for the simulation of rupture geometry within probabilistic seismic-hazard analysis", Bull. Seism. Soc. Am, 104(4), pp.1620~1635 (2014)
- Weichert DH, "Estimation of the earthquake recurrence parameters for unequal observation periods for different magnitudes", Bull. Seism. Soc. Am, 70(4), pp.1337~1346 (1980)
- Sadigh K, "Attenuation relationships for shallow crustal earthquakes based on California Strong Motion Data", Seim. Res. Lett, 68(1), pp.180~189 (1997)