Organizational Innovation in the Korean Government via an ICT-based IKM Framework: A focus on the MOFA
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
With rapidly changing technological implementation of operating systems of businesses, the Ministry of foreign affairs (MOFA) of the Republic of Korea (ROK) has been undergoing digital transformation to its overall operations with the intent to innovate information and knowledge management (IKM) strategies since the mid-2000s. However, assessment as to the effectiveness of implemented IKM has been inadequately analyzed. This study aims to assess the concepts and limitations of the MOFA’s current IKM strategies and the methods it employs to deliver its IKM framework, in light of strengthening the organizational ambidexterity and absorptive capacity, and also fostering organizational innovation through a qualitative study that involves interviews and analysis of reports from MOFA. The MOFA’s IKM possesses dynamic capabilities to adapt to changing digital technologies. However, the institution’s IKM is constrained by limitations associated with the utilization of the IKM system such as a structure that handles confidential documents and a lack of a collaborative system for IKM, and external limitations such as changes in the domestic political situation governing MOFA’s priorities and the hierarchy of government organizations. Consequently, developing the organizational ambidexterity and absorptive capacity was not possible. To develop an IKM framework for organizational innovation, the MOFA must devise a way to minimize the impact of external changes by overcoming internal limitations. To that end, a detailed study on the development of a practically usable IKM system should include establishing a dialogue between job groups and enhancing employee competency in preparation for a changing environment.
Abstract
With rapidly changing technological implementation of operating systems of businesses, the Ministry of foreign affairs (MOFA) of the Republic of Korea (ROK) has been undergoing digital transformation to its overall operations with the intent to innovate information and knowledge management (IKM) strategies since the mid-2000s. However, assessment as to the effectiveness of implemented IKM has been inadequately analyzed. This study aims to assess the concepts and limitations of the MOFA’s current IKM strategies and the methods it employs to deliver its IKM framework, in light of strengthening the organizational ambidexterity and absorptive capacity, and also fostering organizational innovation through a qualitative study that involves interviews and analysis of reports from MOFA. The MOFA’s IKM possesses dynamic capabilities to adapt to changing digital technologies. However, the institution’s IKM is constrained by limitations associated with the utilization of the IKM system such as a structure that handles confidential documents and a lack of a collaborative system for IKM, and external limitations such as changes in the domestic political situation governing MOFA’s priorities and the hierarchy of government organizations. Consequently, developing the organizational ambidexterity and absorptive capacity was not possible. To develop an IKM framework for organizational innovation, the MOFA must devise a way to minimize the impact of external changes by overcoming internal limitations. To that end, a detailed study on the development of a practically usable IKM system should include establishing a dialogue between job groups and enhancing employee competency in preparation for a changing environment.
참고문헌 (47)
- Adesina, A. O., "The SECI model in knowledge management practices : past, present and future", Mousaion, 37(3), pp.34~ (2019)[DOI]
- Arsac, L., "South Korea’s geopolitics: on the road to “influential diplomacy”", Territory and Seas, 8, pp.108~136 (2014)[DOI]
- Bawden, D., "User-oriented evaluation of information systems and services" (1990), Gower
- Birkinshaw, J., "Building Ambidexterity Into an Organization", MIT Sloan Management Review (2004)
- Boynton, A. C., "The influence of IT management practice on IT use in large organizations", MIS Quarterly, 18(3), pp.299~318 (1994)[DOI]
- Bryman, A., "Social Research Methods" (2001), Oxford University Press
- Cohen, W. M., "Absorptive capacity : a new perspective on learning and innovation", Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), pp.128~152 (1990)[DOI]
- "An interview with Sheila Corrall: Interview by Margaret Adolphus" (2008)[URL]
- Daniel, J., "Sampling Essentials: Practical Guidelines for Making Sampling Choices" (2011), SAGE Publications
- Daspit, J. J., "Understanding the multi-dimensional nature of absorptive capacity", Journal of Managerial Issues, 25(3), pp.299~316 (2013)[DOI]
- Davenport, T. H., "Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know" (1998), Harvard Business School Press
- Building the knowledge-based organization: how culture drive knowledge behaviors, "De long", Centers for Business Innovation, 1~29 (1997)
- Eisenhardt, K. M., "Dynamic capabilities: what are they?", Strategic Management Journal, 21(10, pp.11) (2000), 1105~1121
- Ghoshal, S., "The individualized corporation: A fundamentally new approach to management" (2000), Random House Business
- Glaser, B., "The discovery of grounded theory" (1967), Aldine Publishing Company
- Hansen, M. T., "What’s your Strategy for Managing Knowledge? In The Knowledge Management Yearbook 2000-2001" (2000), Routledge
- Hislop, D., "Knowledge Management in Organizations: A Critical Introduction" (2005), Oxford University Press
- Im, “John” J. H., "E-government in South Korea: planning and implementation", Electronic Government, an International Journal, 2(2), pp.188~204 (2005)[DOI]
- Jansen, J. J. P., "Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and ambidexterity : the impact of environmental and organizational antecedents", Schmalenbach Business Review, 57(4), pp.351~363 (2005)[DOI]
- Joshi, K. D., "Changing the competitive landscape : continuous innovation through IT-enabled knowledge capabilities", Information Systems Research, 21(3), pp.472~495 (2010)[DOI]
- Klinger, N., "Organizational ambidexterity and absorptive capacity", Otago Management Graduate Review, 14, pp.21~30 (2016)
- Lee, C. S., "ICT and knowledge management : perspective from the SECI model", The Electronic Library, 31(2), pp.226~243 (2013)[DOI]
- Leonard, D., "The role of tacit knowledge in group innovation", California Management Review, 40(3), pp.112~132 (1998)[DOI]
- Levinthal, D. A., "The myopia of learning", Strategic Management Journal, 14(S2), pp.95~112 (1993)[DOI]
- Liebowitz, J., "Knowledge management and its link to artificial intelligence", Expert Systems with Applications, 20(1), pp.1~6 (2001)[DOI]
- Mahler, J. G., "Organizational Learning at NASA: The Challenger and Columbia Accidents" (2009), Georgetown University Press
- "The announcement of the “New Growth 4.0 Strategic Promotion Plan”" (2022)[URL]
- Innovation Roadmap of the MOFA of the Republic of Korea, "Ministry of Foreign Affaris", ~ (2017)
- "50 years of e-Government history" (2017)[URL]
- Natek, S., "Knolwedge management system support SECI model of knowledge-creating process", TIIM, 16(251) (2016)
- Nonaka, I., "The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation" (1995), Oxford University Press
- O’Leary, N., "Learning informally to use teaching games for understanding : the experiences of a recently qualified teacher", European Physical Education Review, 20(3), pp.367~384 (2014)[DOI]
- O’Reilly, C. A., "Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability : Resolving the innovator’s dilemma", Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, pp.185~206 (2008)[DOI]
- O’Reilly, C. A., "People and organizational culture : a profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit", Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), pp.487~516 (1991)
- Orlikowski, W. J., "Studying information technology in organizations : research approaches and assumptions", Information Systems Research, 2(1), pp.1~28 (1991)[DOI]
- Polanyi, M., "The Tacit Dimension. In Knowledge in Organizations" (1967), Routledge
- Rothaermel, F. T., "Ambidexterity in technology sourcing : the moderating role of absorptive capacity", Organization Science, 20(4), pp.759~780 (2009)[DOI]
- Schopflin, K., "Practical Knowledge and Information Management" (2019), Facet Publishing
- Senge, P. M., "The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization", pp.1990, Doubleday
- Stoddart, L., "Determining the impact of knowledge sharing initiatives in international organizations : Case studies", IFLA Journal, 46(1), pp.64~71 (2020)[DOI]
- Teece, D. J., "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management", Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), pp.509~533 (1997)[DOI]
- Tushman, M. L., "Ambidextrous organizations : managing evolutionary and revolutionary change", California Management Review, 38(4), pp.8~29 (1996)[DOI]
- Vasconcelos, A. C., "Absorptive capacity : a process and structure approach", Journal of Information Science, 45(1), pp.68~83 (2019)[DOI]
- Volberda, H. W., "Co-evolutionary dynamics within and between firms : from evolution to co-evolution", Journal of Management Studies, 40(8), pp.2111~2136 (2003)[DOI]
- Walsham, G., "Doing interpretive research", European Journal of Information Systems, 15(3), pp.320~330 (2006)[DOI]
- Ward, S., "Information as an asset-today’s board agenda : the value of rediscovering gold", Business Information Review, 36(2), pp.53~59 (2019)[DOI]
- Zahra, S. A., "Absorptive capacity : a review, reconceptualization, and extension", Academy of Management Review, 27(2), pp.185~203 (2002)[DOI]
