본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

What We Know We Don’t Know When Jumping on the Wagon of Transnationalism: What the Transnational Turn Entails in Literary Studies?

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

It has been trumpeted out that the narrowly focused attention on a single national literature and inattentiveness to its relationship to other literatures are not tenable any more. The recognition of the peculiarly entangled web of border-crossing relationships to other literatures leads to a correspondingly wide variety of critical practices to capture a diverse and hybrid literary dynamics. As such, the “transnational turn” has been instrumental in honing new interpretative practices that are not only expansive but also flexible enough to locate a literature in relation to other national traditions and within a global context. Nonetheless, it remains to be seen whether it is still premature to jump on the bandwagon called transnationalism, given that there is a discrepancy between what transnationalism claims to do and what it actually performs in redefining the parameters of literary studies. Such discrepancy becomes prominent when it comes to transnational studies’ contingencies vis-à-vis the dominant American culture and the US-centered globalization. It is a legitimate concern because the very prefix “trans” in transnationalism more often than not creates the illusion of a move beyond when there has been no such movement in actuality. This article thus examines what the transnational turn entails in literary studies in general and Irish literary studies in particular.

Abstract

It has been trumpeted out that the narrowly focused attention on a single national literature and inattentiveness to its relationship to other literatures are not tenable any more. The recognition of the peculiarly entangled web of border-crossing relationships to other literatures leads to a correspondingly wide variety of critical practices to capture a diverse and hybrid literary dynamics. As such, the “transnational turn” has been instrumental in honing new interpretative practices that are not only expansive but also flexible enough to locate a literature in relation to other national traditions and within a global context. Nonetheless, it remains to be seen whether it is still premature to jump on the bandwagon called transnationalism, given that there is a discrepancy between what transnationalism claims to do and what it actually performs in redefining the parameters of literary studies. Such discrepancy becomes prominent when it comes to transnational studies’ contingencies vis-à-vis the dominant American culture and the US-centered globalization. It is a legitimate concern because the very prefix “trans” in transnationalism more often than not creates the illusion of a move beyond when there has been no such movement in actuality. This article thus examines what the transnational turn entails in literary studies in general and Irish literary studies in particular.

참고문헌 (14)

  1. Appadurai, Arjun, "Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization" (1996), U of Minnesota P
  2. Attridge, Derek, "Semicolonial Joyce" (2000), Cambridge UP
  3. Cheng, Vincent, "Joyce, Race, and Empire" (1995), Cambridge UP
  4. Fishkin, Shelley Fish, "Crossroads of Cultures: The Transnational Turn in American Studies—Presidential Address to the American Studies Association, November 12, 2004", American Quarterly, 57(1), pp.17~57 (2005)
  5. Friedman, Susan Stanford, "Planetarity: Musing Modernist Studies", Modernism, 2010, pp.17(3), 471~499
  6. Hardt, Michael, "Empire" (2000), Harvard UP
  7. Hobsbawm, Eric, "Nations and Nationalisms since 1780: Programme, Myth, Reality" (1990), Cambridge UP
  8. Kiberd, Declan, "Inventing Ireland" (1997), Harvard UP
  9. Jameson, Fredric, "Postmodernism, or The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism" (1991), Duke UP
  10. McClintock, Anne, "Imperial Leather: Race, Gender and Sexuality in the Colonial Contest" (1995), Routledge
  11. Porter, Carolyn, "What We Know That We Don’t Know: Remapping American Literary Studies", American Literary History, 6(3), pp.467~526 (1994)
  12. Washington, Mary Helen, "Disturbing the Peace: What Happened to American Studies If You Put African American Studies at the Center? Presidential Address to the American Studies Association, October 29, 1997", American Quarterly, 50(1), pp.1~23 (1998)
  13. Whelehan, Niall, "Transnational Perspectives on Irish History", pp.7~29 (2015), Routledge
  14. Local: Cultural Production and the Transnational Imaginary, "Global", pp.1996, Wilson, Rob

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)