본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

漢語 通攝 韻母의 음운 변화 ― 上古에서 中古까지

Phonological Changes of Finals in Tong Group(通攝) from Old Chinese to Middle Chinese

권혁준
중국어문연구회 (Chinese Literary Society)|2008.09|중국어문논총 (Journal of Chinese Language and Literature)|제38호|pp. 27-56|DOI 10.26586/chls.2008..38.003

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

Abstract

There have been controversies upon the phonology of Tong group(通攝) in Old and Middle Chinese(hererafter OC and MC respectively) so far. This article mainly investigates the phonological changes of finals of this group from OC to MC(by Yuan period). In order to reconstruct OC phonology, I employ some of new evidences as well as the conventional ones, such as rhymes in verse, phonetic components and etc. Most of Tong group words originated from Dong(Wu) group(東屋部) and Dong(Jue) group(冬覺部). Some statistical data show that Dong(Wu) group used to have frequent rhyming or Tongjia(通假) contacts with Yang(Duo) group(陽鐸部), the vowel of which was most probably [*a] in OC. Consequently, the vowel of Dong(Wu) group and that of Dong(Jue) group are respectively reconstructed as [*o] and [*u]. There was a temporary merge of the two groups in terms of rhyming in Liu Song times, but not necessarily a complete phonological merge. I believe that it was a [+high] feature commonly retained in segments, such as [U], [u] or a glide [ʷ] which enabled the groups to interrhyme within themselves. Each group of OC words, depending upon different conditions, were separately assigned to different rhymes or different grades before MC. I assume the phonological changes from OC to Qieyun as [*oŋ] ＞ [uŋ](Dong I 東韻 1等), [*juŋ] ＞ [juŋ](Dong Ⅲ 東韻 3等), [*uŋ] ＞ [uoŋ](Dong 冬韻), and [*joŋ] ＞ [jʷoŋ](Zhong 鍾韻). The change of the phonological categories accounts partly for the natural phonological changes within the language, and partly for a shift of dialect base from the North to the South. By the 9th century, Dong I(東韻 1等) and Dong(冬韻) merged, giving [oŋ], while Dong Ⅲ(東韻 3等) and Zhong(鍾韻) were still separate from each other. Afterwards, the Tong group vowels seem to have been incorporated as represented in Gujinyunhui juyao or in hP’ags-pa orthography. But I have no explanation for precisely when and how the merge within the group was taking place. But all the vowels were unified to either [o] or [u], seemingly depending upon geographical and dialectical divergencies. I suspect that the vowels of Dong I(東韻 1等) and Dong(冬韻) were raised to [u] before the vowel of Zhong(鍾) became [u], which in turn had the medial [ʷ] deleted, in the Northwestern region, while the vowel of Dong Ⅲ(東韻 3等) lowered to [o] in the Southern region probably by the Yuan.

참고문헌 (55)

  1. 陳彭年, "宋本廣韻", 黎明文化事業公司
  2. 龍宇純, "韻鏡校注" (1959), 藝文印書館
  3. 藝文印書館, "等韻五鍾" (1980), 藝文印書館
  4. 徐, "說文解字繫傳" (1987), 中華書局
  5. 黃公紹 編輯 熊忠 擧要, "古今韻會擧要", 中文出版社影印
  6. 周德淸, "中原音韻", 藝文印書館影印
  7. 北京大學, "漢語方音字彙" (1962), 文字改革出版社
  8. 照那斯圖, "蒙古字韻校本", 民族出版社
  9. 馮其庸, "通假字彙釋" (2006), 北京大學出版社
  10. 昌? 厚, "＜隋韻譜＞", 中國語文, 109, pp.47~57 (1961)
  11. 董同, "漢語音韻學" (1965), 文史哲出版社
  12. 黃笑山, "切韻和中唐五代音位系統" (1991), 文津出版社
  13. 黃?伯, "慧琳一切經音義反切攷" (1931), 中央硏究院歷史語言硏究所
  14. 黃?伯, "唐代關中方言音系" (1998), 江蘇古籍出版社
  15. 李方桂, "上古音硏究", pp.1~61 (1971), Tsinghua Journal of Chinese Studies
  16. 李? 榮, "切韻音系" (1956), 鼎文書局
  17. 李維一, "初唐四傑詩韻", 語言學論叢, 9, pp.258~287 (1982)
  18. 劉綸, "中古通江二攝字在魏晉南北朝的押韻分析", 古漢語硏究, 10, pp.30~34 (1991)
  19. 陸志韋, "古音說略" (1939), 學生書局
  20. 羅常培, "唐五代西北方音" (1933), 中央硏究院歷史語言硏究所
  21. 羅常培, "漢魏晉南北朝韻部演變硏究" (1958), 科學出版社
  22. 馬重奇, "杜甫古詩韻讀" (1985), 中國展望出版社
  23. 麥? 耘, "漢語語音史上"中古時期"內部階段的劃分", pp.147~166 (2002), 東方出版中心
  24. 潘悟雲, "漢語歷史音韻學" (2000), 上海敎育出版社
  25. 權赫埈, "後期中古漢語의 음운체계", 중국어문논총, 22, pp.1~28 (2002), 중국어문연구회
  26. 邵榮芬, "五經文字 的直音和反切", 中國語文, 130, pp.214~230 (1964)
  27. 邵榮芬, "晉書音義 反切的語音系統", 語言硏究, 1, pp.103~124 (1981)
  28. 邵榮芬, "經典釋文音系" (1995), 學海出版社
  29. 施向東, "玄?譯著中的梵漢對音和唐初中原音韻", pp.27~48 (1983), 語言硏究
  30. 施向東, "漢語和藏語同源體系的比較硏究" (2000), 華語敎育出版社
  31. 施向東, "十六國時代譯經中的梵漢對音", 天津大學學報, 3(1), pp.24~28 (2001)
  32. 王? 力, "南北朝詩人用韻考", pp.1~62 (1936), 龍蟲?雕齋文集
  33. 王? 力, "漢越語硏究", 龍蟲雕齋文集, pp.704~818 (1948), 中華書局
  34. 王? 力, "漢語史稿" (1958), 中華書局
  35. 王? 力, "朱?反切考", 龍蟲雕齋文集, pp.212~256 (1982)
  36. 王? 力, "漢語語音史" (1985), 中國社會科學出版社
  37. 兪? 敏, "兪敏語言學論文集" (1999), 中國社會科學出版社
  38. 鄭張尙芳, "上古韻母系統和四等、介音、聲調的發源問題", 溫州師院學報, 4, pp.67~90 (1987)
  39. 鄭張尙芳, "上古音系" (2003), 上海敎育出版社
  40. 周法高, "玄應反切考", 中國語言學論文集 (1948), 聯經出版事業公司
  41. 周祖謨, "萬象名義中之原本玉篇音系", pp.270~404 (1966), 問學集
  42. 周祖謨, "兩漢韻部略說", 問學集, pp.24~31 (1966), 中華書局
  43. 周祖謨, "宋代?洛語音考", 問學集, pp.581~655 (1966), 中華書局
  44. 周祖謨, "魏晉宋時期時文韻部的演變", 中國語言學報, 1, pp.91~113 (1983)
  45. 周祖謨, "魏晉南北朝韻部之演變" (1996), 東大圖書公司
  46. 周祖謨, "魏晉音與齊梁音", 文字音韻訓論集, pp.61~85 (2000), 北京:北京大學出版社
  47. 周祖謨, "齊梁陳隋時期詩文韻部硏究", 文字音韻訓論集, pp.117~140 (2000), 北京大學出版社
  48. Baxter,William, "A Handbook of Old Chinese Phonology" (1992), Mouton de Gruyter
  49. Coblin,South, "ASinologist'sHandlistofSino-TibetanLexical Comparisons" (1986), Steyler VerlagㆍNettel
  50. 엄익상, "표준중국어 음운론" (2005), 한국문화사
  51. Karlgren, Bernhard, "Etudes sur la phonologie chinoise" (1915)
  52. 최영애, "古代漢語音韻學槪要" (1985), 민음사
  53. Pulleyblank, Edwin, "The Consonantal System of Old Chinese", Asia Major, 9, pp.58~144 (1962)
  54. Pulleyblank,Edwin, "Middle Chinese: A Study in Historical Chinese" (1984), the University of British Columbia
  55. Ting,Pang-hsin, "Chinese Phonology of Wei-Chin Period: Reconstruction of the Finals as reflected in Poetry" (1975), Institute of History and Philology Academia Sinica

관련 논문AI추천

한자음 설내 입성 운미의 유음화에 대하여이장희언어과학회 · 언어과학연구2005 · 제1권 제32호中古漢語 撮口呼의 音韻 再考 -韓日 漢字音의 例를 中心으로-이경철일본연구소 · 일본연구2009 · 제40호한국 고대음운 연구를 위한 한자의 활용방법에 대하여김경숙한국중국문화학회 · 중국학논총2005 · 제19호이중 한자음에 나타나는 입성운미 /-t/의 변화 양상에 대하여최미현한말연구학회 · 한말연구2006 · 제18호國語 音素 分布의 通時的 變化한성우한국어문교육연구회 · 어문연구(語文硏究)2006 · 제34권 제3호중국어 음성학·음운론 관련 한국어 용어의 문제엄익상한국중국어문학회 · 중국문학2007 · 제52권

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)

≪上海博物館藏戰國楚竹書≫語法劄記五則강윤옥pp. 1-12≪古代璽印輯存≫ 文字 考釋에 보이는 오류 분석(Ⅰ)文炳淳pp. 13-26≪廣韻≫ 麻韻 瓜小韻 所屬字의 불규칙 음운변화에 대하여 ― ‘蝸’를 중심으로金俊憲pp. 57-85與重紐三等牙喉音字相關的“漢-韓準同源詞”오세준pp. 87-114≪水滸傳≫ 동결식ㆍ동추식의 부정식과 도상성박원기pp. 115-137
원문 보기