본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

汉语法律语体省略考察— 以≪中华人民共和国宪法≫为例

On Ellipsis of Chinese Legal Register: A Case Study of Constitution of the People’s Republic of China

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

In Constitution of the People’s Republic of China, the omitted component is mainly the subject, and the syntactic function of the omitted component and the recall component are often the same. The positions of the omitted component and the recall component in the sentence are mainly symmetrical and head-tail, and the form is unified. The clauses where the omitted component and the recall component mainly have no interval, and the interval is small. There are more anaphoric ellipsis, less encyclopedia knowledge ellipsis, and no cataphoric ellipsis; more clausal ellipsis, less subordinate clausal ellipsis and simple clausal ellipsis. Accessibility and hierarchy are important factors that affect the ellipsis of Chinese legal register. The syntactic functions of the omitted component and the recall component are different in accessibility, the interval and topicality also affect it. The hierarchy mainly reflects in coordinative relation, subordinative relation and structural parallelism between clauses. The omission and recall of low-accessibility components, as well as the low-frequency forms of cross-sentence ellipsis and cross-paragraph ellipsis, tend to shorter interval, recall components are all with high topicality and can often be explained in hierarchy.

Abstract

In Constitution of the People’s Republic of China, the omitted component is mainly the subject, and the syntactic function of the omitted component and the recall component are often the same. The positions of the omitted component and the recall component in the sentence are mainly symmetrical and head-tail, and the form is unified. The clauses where the omitted component and the recall component mainly have no interval, and the interval is small. There are more anaphoric ellipsis, less encyclopedia knowledge ellipsis, and no cataphoric ellipsis; more clausal ellipsis, less subordinate clausal ellipsis and simple clausal ellipsis. Accessibility and hierarchy are important factors that affect the ellipsis of Chinese legal register. The syntactic functions of the omitted component and the recall component are different in accessibility, the interval and topicality also affect it. The hierarchy mainly reflects in coordinative relation, subordinative relation and structural parallelism between clauses. The omission and recall of low-accessibility components, as well as the low-frequency forms of cross-sentence ellipsis and cross-paragraph ellipsis, tend to shorter interval, recall components are all with high topicality and can often be explained in hierarchy.

참고문헌 (18)

  1. 陈 平, "汉语零形回指的话语分析", 中国语文, (5), pp.363~378 (1987)
  2. 方 梅, "由背景化触发的两种句法结构——主语零形反指和描写性关系从句", 中国语文, (4), pp.291~303 (2008)
  3. 华宏仪, "主语承主语省略探讨", 烟台师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版), (1), pp.83~89 (2001)
  4. 华宏仪, "主语承非主语省略探讨", 烟台师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版), (2), pp.88~95 (2002)
  5. 蒋 平, "影响先行语可及性的因素", 外国语(上海外国语大学学报), (5), pp.43~50 (2003)
  6. 김미금, "汉韩书面省略句比较研究 - 以中韩2019年新年贺词为例", 한중언어문화연구, (54), pp.17~40 (2019), 한국중국언어문화연구회[DOI]
  7. 金美锦, "汉韩零句对比研究", 博士, pp.2020
  8. 廖秋忠, "现代汉语中动词的支配成分的省略", 中国语文, (4), pp.241~247 (1984)
  9. 沈家煊, "英汉对比语法三题", 外语教学与研究, (4), pp.8~13 (1996)
  10. 许余龙, "英汉指称词语表达的可及性", 外语教学与研究, (5), pp.321~328 (2000)
  11. 杨晓蕴, "法律语体零形回指分析——兼与文艺语体零形回指比较", 硕士, pp.2009
  12. 殷树林, "非主谓句名称的由来、范围和理论地位", 辽宁师范大学学报(社会科学版), (4), pp.89~94 (2019)
  13. 殷树林, "关于虚词、比较句和量词短语的省略问题", 修辞研究, 4 (2019), 暨南大学出版社
  14. 郑远汉, "省略句的性质及其规范问题", 语言文字应用, (2), pp.10~17 (1998)
  15. Keenan, E. L., "Noun phase accessibility and universal grammar", Linguistic Inquiry (1977)
  16. Givón, T., "Topic Continuity in Discourse Analysis: A Quantitative Cross—linguistic Study" (1983), John Benjamins Publishing Company
  17. Ariel, M., "Referring and accessibility", Journal of Linguistics (1988)
  18. Ariel, M., "Accessing Noun—phase Antecedents" (1990), Routledge

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)