본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

石介의 序文 硏究

A Study on Xuwen(序文) by Shijie(石介)

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

Xuwen(序文) is consisted of various sanctions and composition. It clarifies the thesis and appeals to emotions through expression techniques such as contrast and gradation and so on. In the Xuwen(序文), Shijie(石介) emphasizes trust in historical facts and values his own perspective on literature, Confucian ideas, literary theories, and values. It secures persuasive power by simply and coherently speaking in accordance with the prose style of Zengxu(贈序) and Shuxu(書序), while showing off its writing ability through a mixture of opinions and writings, or rich emotions, or through cool-headed rationality. In addition, the accent and admiration are at their peak, while the sentences are consistent from beginning to end with one thesis through proper admiration and reflection, maximizing the literary effect. His Xuwen(序文) gains credibility based on historical truth, chooses to persuade him by appealing to emotions, or maintains objectivity in a consistent tone. In addition, he explicitly and clearly expresses his view of history, Jingxueguan(經學觀), literary theory, and political ideas through the introduction of a simple sentence. All of these are his thoroughly prepared valuable values and positive contributions to Guwen(古文) movement. Therefore, a re-evaluation of Shijie(石介)’s Xuwen(序文) should be carried out, and other prose styles should be continuously studied. This continuous study is expected to help understand the transitional phenomenon of early Song dynasty Guwen(古文) movement and to study the basis of the sentences of the breeder, including Ouyangxiu(歐陽修). In fact, Xuwen(序文) can be evaluated very positively in terms of composition, relief, plain language, and effective investigative techniques. Thus, there is room for reconsideration of a series of negative assessments of his prose being bizarre, obfuscated and unusual. In addition, it was considered to be a great sentence that is consistent with clarity of the thesis, effective composition and technique, compared to Ouyangxiu(歐陽修)’s Xuwen(序文), which has taken a step further in various sanctions, themes, and expression techniques. Xuwen(序文) by Shijie(石介) should be re-examined in the history of Chinese traiditional prose, and his influence on the Guwen(古文) movement should never be overlooked.

Abstract

Xuwen(序文) is consisted of various sanctions and composition. It clarifies the thesis and appeals to emotions through expression techniques such as contrast and gradation and so on. In the Xuwen(序文), Shijie(石介) emphasizes trust in historical facts and values his own perspective on literature, Confucian ideas, literary theories, and values. It secures persuasive power by simply and coherently speaking in accordance with the prose style of Zengxu(贈序) and Shuxu(書序), while showing off its writing ability through a mixture of opinions and writings, or rich emotions, or through cool-headed rationality. In addition, the accent and admiration are at their peak, while the sentences are consistent from beginning to end with one thesis through proper admiration and reflection, maximizing the literary effect. His Xuwen(序文) gains credibility based on historical truth, chooses to persuade him by appealing to emotions, or maintains objectivity in a consistent tone. In addition, he explicitly and clearly expresses his view of history, Jingxueguan(經學觀), literary theory, and political ideas through the introduction of a simple sentence. All of these are his thoroughly prepared valuable values and positive contributions to Guwen(古文) movement. Therefore, a re-evaluation of Shijie(石介)’s Xuwen(序文) should be carried out, and other prose styles should be continuously studied. This continuous study is expected to help understand the transitional phenomenon of early Song dynasty Guwen(古文) movement and to study the basis of the sentences of the breeder, including Ouyangxiu(歐陽修). In fact, Xuwen(序文) can be evaluated very positively in terms of composition, relief, plain language, and effective investigative techniques. Thus, there is room for reconsideration of a series of negative assessments of his prose being bizarre, obfuscated and unusual. In addition, it was considered to be a great sentence that is consistent with clarity of the thesis, effective composition and technique, compared to Ouyangxiu(歐陽修)’s Xuwen(序文), which has taken a step further in various sanctions, themes, and expression techniques. Xuwen(序文) by Shijie(石介) should be re-examined in the history of Chinese traiditional prose, and his influence on the Guwen(古文) movement should never be overlooked.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. 黃宗羲, "宋元學案" (1987), 華世出版社
  2. 歐陽永叔, "歐陽修全集" (1992), 中國書店
  3. 王 茜, "石介年谱" (2002), 郑州大学
  4. 柳 开, "河東集" (2003), 北京圖書館出版社
  5. 姚艳丽, "石介與宋初文学" (2005), 华东师范大学
  6. 王耀祖, "孙復, 石介與宋代儒学復兴" (2006), 山东师范大学
  7. 李贞涛, "石介思想研究" (2008), 山东大学
  8. 石 介, "徂徠石先生文集" (2009), 中華書局
  9. 脫 脫, "宋史" (2015), 上海人民出版社
  10. 赵耀堂, "论宋初作家石介", 聊城大学学报(社会科学版), (4) (1987)
  11. 潘富恩, "论石介", 文史哲, (1) (1989)
  12. 黄寶华, "北宋古文运动发微", 上海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), (4) (1995)
  13. 李峻岫, "石介交游考", 文献, (1) (2002)
  14. 莫道才, "石介與苏舜钦: 谁是≪石曼卿诗集序≫之作者?", 文学遗产, (4) (2002)
  15. 杨国安, "欧阳修、石介與宋代漢学的兴盛", 史学月刊, (4) (2003)
  16. 黄 海, "从欧阳修对石介的批评看他的文学思想", 安顺师范高等专科学校学报, (1) (2006)
  17. 何利华, "石介“氣”思想之浅论", 安徽文学(下半月), (10) (2007)
  18. 이승신, "范仲淹과 歐陽脩의 交遊 關係 硏究", 중국학논총, (26), pp.199~219 (2009), 중국학연구소[DOI]
  19. 이승신, "宋初 三先生이 北宋古文運動에 미친 영향 연구― 歐陽修와 石介의 교유를 중심으로", 중국학논총, (59), pp.53~72 (2018), 중국학연구소[DOI]
  20. 이승신, "石介의 <怪說>硏究", 중국학논총, (61), pp.77~98 (2018), 중국학연구소[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)