본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

歐陽修의 李白詩에 대한 평가 연구

An Evaluation Study on Li Bai(李白)’s Poetry by Ouyang Xiu(歐陽修)

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

The Songliujia(宋六家), which led the movement of Guwen(古文) in Song(宋) dynasty, opposed the popular Xikunti(西崑體) and Siliuwen(四六文) in terms of poetry and writings at the time, and achieved a solid position in literary history. It can already be fully examined in literary history that the role of Ouyang Xiu(歐陽修) was significant in this process. Along with the movement to cultivate the sentences of the Han Yu(韓愈) of Ouyang Xiu(歐陽修) and write ancient writings, the Songliujia(宋六家) was at the forefront of political and literary reform. In the later years, both Han Yu(韓愈) and the Liu Zongyuan(柳宗元) along with the reform movement of Tangsongbadajia(唐宋八大家) have firmly established themselves as “two masters of prose”. Despite the fact that they were masters in poetry and prose, his poetry was evaluated relatively stingy. The reason, of course, is mainly due to the tendency of Song(宋) poetry and discourse compared to Tang(唐) poetry. In fact, in the field of poetry, there was a trend of following the poets Li Bai(李白) and Du Fu(杜甫) of the Tang Dynasty. This trend was leading by the Songliujia(宋六家). Especially Ouyang Xiu(歐陽修) was intersted in the poet Li Bai(李白). Considering the tendency of Ouyang Xiu(歐陽修)’s Confucianism and the strict attitude in creating old writings, it may be very questionable to praise Li Bai(李白), a generous and free poet with moral and romantic thoughts, not the other master Du Fu(杜甫) whose thought was Confucianism. Ouyang Xiu(歐陽修) is a person who led the Song(宋) Dynasty’s poetry innovation movement and contributed greatly to the development of poetry. He is a person who has developed a variety of prose styles within his sentence, including Zouyi(奏議), Beizhi(碑誌), Youji(遊記) and ritual writings. He wrote names using content and rhetoric appropriate to the characteristics of each detailed style. Therefore, his contribution and position within his sentences are very high in the history of ancient Chinese literature. In light of this, it is impossible to overlook the characteristics of major classification styles such as sentences, poems, and Ci(詞), just as Ouyang Xiu(歐陽修) achieved the development of content and form for each format within a sentence. It is believed that sentences appreciated the beauty of sentences, poetry appreciated the beauty of poetry, and Ci(詞) appreciated works that made the most of Ci(詞). Therefore, the artist who best utilized the beauty of poetry was evaluated as Li Bai(李白). Ouyang Xiu(歐陽修) evaluated the content and form of Li Bai(李白)’s poetry were the poems the most appreciated the beauty of poetry. This evaluation is consistent with his literary criticism and practice. Also Ouyang Xiu(歐陽修) envy Li Bai(李白)’s genius and freewheeling, carefree. He wrote poetry in pursuit of Li Bai(李白)’s style.

Abstract

The Songliujia(宋六家), which led the movement of Guwen(古文) in Song(宋) dynasty, opposed the popular Xikunti(西崑體) and Siliuwen(四六文) in terms of poetry and writings at the time, and achieved a solid position in literary history. It can already be fully examined in literary history that the role of Ouyang Xiu(歐陽修) was significant in this process. Along with the movement to cultivate the sentences of the Han Yu(韓愈) of Ouyang Xiu(歐陽修) and write ancient writings, the Songliujia(宋六家) was at the forefront of political and literary reform. In the later years, both Han Yu(韓愈) and the Liu Zongyuan(柳宗元) along with the reform movement of Tangsongbadajia(唐宋八大家) have firmly established themselves as “two masters of prose”. Despite the fact that they were masters in poetry and prose, his poetry was evaluated relatively stingy. The reason, of course, is mainly due to the tendency of Song(宋) poetry and discourse compared to Tang(唐) poetry. In fact, in the field of poetry, there was a trend of following the poets Li Bai(李白) and Du Fu(杜甫) of the Tang Dynasty. This trend was leading by the Songliujia(宋六家). Especially Ouyang Xiu(歐陽修) was intersted in the poet Li Bai(李白). Considering the tendency of Ouyang Xiu(歐陽修)’s Confucianism and the strict attitude in creating old writings, it may be very questionable to praise Li Bai(李白), a generous and free poet with moral and romantic thoughts, not the other master Du Fu(杜甫) whose thought was Confucianism. Ouyang Xiu(歐陽修) is a person who led the Song(宋) Dynasty’s poetry innovation movement and contributed greatly to the development of poetry. He is a person who has developed a variety of prose styles within his sentence, including Zouyi(奏議), Beizhi(碑誌), Youji(遊記) and ritual writings. He wrote names using content and rhetoric appropriate to the characteristics of each detailed style. Therefore, his contribution and position within his sentences are very high in the history of ancient Chinese literature. In light of this, it is impossible to overlook the characteristics of major classification styles such as sentences, poems, and Ci(詞), just as Ouyang Xiu(歐陽修) achieved the development of content and form for each format within a sentence. It is believed that sentences appreciated the beauty of sentences, poetry appreciated the beauty of poetry, and Ci(詞) appreciated works that made the most of Ci(詞). Therefore, the artist who best utilized the beauty of poetry was evaluated as Li Bai(李白). Ouyang Xiu(歐陽修) evaluated the content and form of Li Bai(李白)’s poetry were the poems the most appreciated the beauty of poetry. This evaluation is consistent with his literary criticism and practice. Also Ouyang Xiu(歐陽修) envy Li Bai(李白)’s genius and freewheeling, carefree. He wrote poetry in pursuit of Li Bai(李白)’s style.

참고문헌 (50)

  1. 김규선, "歷代詩話3" (2013), 소명출판사
  2. 권호종, "歐陽修詩選" (2002), 문예출판사
  3. 류성준, "중국시학의 이해" (2005), 신아사
  4. 歐陽修, "귀전록" (2008), 학고방
  5. 吳楚材, "古文觀止" (2013), 역락출판사
  6. 하문환, "역대시화" (2013), 소명출판사
  7. 北京大学古文献研究所, "全宋詩" (1998), 北京大學出版社
  8. 仇兆鳌, "杜詩詳注" (2015), 中華書局
  9. 曾枣莊, "全宋文" (2006), 上海辞书出版社
  10. 丁功誼, "歐陽修詩評注" (2012), 江西人民出版社
  11. 高文虎, "蓼花洲闲錄" (1985), 中華書局
  12. 黃庭堅, "黃庭堅全集" (2011), 江西人民出版社
  13. 黃宗羲, "宋元學案" (1987), 華世出版社
  14. 李白, "李太白全集" (1998), 中華書局
  15. 李白, "李白全集校注" (2015), 鳳凰出版社
  16. 廖悰, "李白文化心理探微" (2018), 西南交通大學出版社
  17. 林子鈞, "六一居士歐陽修" (1983), 莊嚴出版社
  18. 刘壎, "隱居通議" (2018), 九州出版社
  19. 歐陽修, "新唐书" (2013), 中華書局
  20. 歐陽永, "歐陽修全集" (1992), 中國書店
  21. 蘇軾, "蘇東坡全集" (2009), 燕山出版社
  22. 蘇轍, "蘇轍集" (2004), 中華書局
  23. 脫脫, "宋史" (2015), 上海人民出版社
  24. 王安石, "王安石全集" (1996), 吉林人民出版社
  25. 王力, "漢語詩律學" (2015), 中華書局
  26. 吴文治, "宋詩話全篇" (1998), 江蘇古籍出版社
  27. 杨玉, "≪全宋诗≫补遗與宋代文学研究" (2020), 浙江工商大学出版社
  28. 郁賢皓, "李白選集" (2013), 上海古籍出版社
  29. 張毅, "宋代文學思想史" (2004), 中華書局
  30. 李承信, "歐陽修<居士集>의 散文文體硏究", 博士, pp.2003
  31. 李佳, "論歐陽修對李白詩歌的繼承", 碩士, pp.2007
  32. 김경동, "중국고전 詩文읽기에 있어 오해와 진실", 中語中文學, (70) (2017)
  33. 김규선, "≪六一詩話≫의 형성 원인과 의의", 중국연구 (2015)
  34. 권호종, "歐陽修詩論硏究", 중국문학, 11 (1984)
  35. 노장시, "≪육일시화≫에 나타난 歐陽修의 문학관", 중국학보, 48 (2003)
  36. 송용준, "歐陽修의 시론과 시", 중국어문학, 32 (1998)
  37. 변성규, "杜甫평가의 시대적 변화 ― 宋代의 杜甫재평가", 중국문학, 36 (2001)
  38. 우재호, "宋代詩話李白論― 以李白杜甫優劣論爲主", 중국어문학 (2011)
  39. 車柱環, "歐陽修의 詩觀", 동양학국제학술회의논문집 (1985)
  40. 曾祥波, "现存最早杜诗编年注本≪杜诗赵次公先後解≫平议", 杜甫研究学刊, (2) (2015)
  41. 陈道贵, "≪杜诗说≫與≪钱注杜诗≫关系述论――兼及钱注之得失", 中国韵文学刊, (2) (2005)
  42. 陳公望, "梅堯臣與歐陽修", 牡丹江師範學院學報, 哲學社會科學版 (1995)
  43. 陈尚君, "欧阳修的笔记與诗话", 中华书局聚珍文化, ~ (2020)
  44. 孙宗英, "‘欧公不好杜诗’说探论―兼及欧阳修诗的评價", 杜甫研究学刊, (1) (2015)
  45. 楊慶存, "宋代散文體裁樣式的開拓與創新", 中國社會科學 (1995)
  46. 王辉斌, "自说自话的杜诗题旨“解读”――略评≪杜诗<奉酬薛十二丈判官见赠>辨析≫一文之谬", 南阳师范学院学报, (2) (2012)
  47. 王学泰, "杜诗的赵次公注與宋代的杜诗研究", 首都师范大学学报: 社会科学版, (1) (1994)
  48. 徐美秋, "≪苏轼资料汇编≫之纪昀≪苏文忠公诗集≫勘正-兼及≪苏诗汇评≫", 中华文学史料学学会古代文学史料研究分会2017年会暨中原文学文献学术研讨会 (2017)
  49. 张佳, "‘以杜证杜’: ≪杜诗详注≫读法例说——杜诗仇注的注释学研究初步", 唐都学刊, (3) (2010)
  50. 张琦, "谈宋代诗坛的新变派", 社科纵横, (2) (1995)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (16건)