≪莊子≫에 나타난 ‘小說’의 의미에 대한 고찰
The Significance of ‘Xiao-shuo(小說)’ in Zhuangzi(≪莊子≫)
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In the history of Chinese Literature, ‘Xiao-shuo(小說)’ originated in Zhuangzi. The sentence is “use ‘Xiao-shuo’ to earn a great reputation(飾小說以幹縣令)”. Many scholars have considered ‘Xiao-shuo’ to mean trivial tales or short stories, which have nothing to do with the great Tao(道). This paper studied the whole text of Zhuangzi, in order to research the significance of ‘Xiao-shuo’. I conclude ‘Xiao-shuo’ does not mean trivial tales or short stories, but some other theories of Ancient Chinese Classics which do not concern the great Tao. Zhuangzi asserts that the greatest theories should follow the great Tao. This is what Taoism usually refers to, but some theories do not follow or derive from the great Tao, just minor or trivial lectures. He called such theories ‘Xiao-shuo’. In Zhuangzi, Chuang-tzu also called something similar as ‘Xiao-shuo’, including ‘Xiao-yan(小言)’, ‘Su-yan(俗言)’ and ‘Ye-yu(野語)’. Each type is distinctive, seems the ‘suk-yan(俗言)’ is the most similar to interesting tales. After 20th ‘Xiao-shuo’ became like ‘novel’ in West literature. In old China it has many significance like tale, fiction, story, and novel, But in Zhuangzi, it doesn’t mean that.
Abstract
In the history of Chinese Literature, ‘Xiao-shuo(小說)’ originated in Zhuangzi. The sentence is “use ‘Xiao-shuo’ to earn a great reputation(飾小說以幹縣令)”. Many scholars have considered ‘Xiao-shuo’ to mean trivial tales or short stories, which have nothing to do with the great Tao(道). This paper studied the whole text of Zhuangzi, in order to research the significance of ‘Xiao-shuo’. I conclude ‘Xiao-shuo’ does not mean trivial tales or short stories, but some other theories of Ancient Chinese Classics which do not concern the great Tao. Zhuangzi asserts that the greatest theories should follow the great Tao. This is what Taoism usually refers to, but some theories do not follow or derive from the great Tao, just minor or trivial lectures. He called such theories ‘Xiao-shuo’. In Zhuangzi, Chuang-tzu also called something similar as ‘Xiao-shuo’, including ‘Xiao-yan(小言)’, ‘Su-yan(俗言)’ and ‘Ye-yu(野語)’. Each type is distinctive, seems the ‘suk-yan(俗言)’ is the most similar to interesting tales. After 20th ‘Xiao-shuo’ became like ‘novel’ in West literature. In old China it has many significance like tale, fiction, story, and novel, But in Zhuangzi, it doesn’t mean that.
참고문헌 (32)
- 張基槿, "論語" (2002), 明文堂
- 李相玉, "禮記" (2003), 明文堂
- 郭象, "成玄英疏" (2011), 中華書局
- 陳鼓應, "莊子今註今譯" (1990), 中華書局
- 王叔岷, "莊子校詮" (2007), 中華書局
- 순자, "荀子" (2001), 을뮤문화사
- 기세춘, "장자" (2007), 바이북스
- 김학주, "중국문학사" (2013), 신아사
- 이수웅, "중국문학사" (2001), 다락원
- 全寅初, "中國古代小說史" (1992), 新雅社
- 北京大學中文系, "中國小說史" (1978)
- 曹雪芹, "新評繡像紅樓夢全傳" (2004), 北京圖書館出版社
- 陳國慶, "漢書藝文志註釋彙編" (2015), 中華書局
- 馮友蘭, "中國哲學簡史(下)" (2007), 天津社會科學院出版社
- 郭英德, "中國古典文學研究史" (1995), 中華書局
- 魯迅, "中國小說史略" (1959), 人民文學出版社
- 胡應麟, "少室山房筆叢, 卷三十六" (1963), 世界書局
- 羅寧, "漢唐小說觀念論稿" (2009), 巴蜀書社
- 孫遜, "中國古典小說美學資料匯粹" (1991), 上海古籍出版社
- 譚正璧, "中國小說發達史" (1935), 上海光明書局出版
- 章學誠, "文史通義" (1966), 中華書局
- 김진곤, "이야기소설Novel ― 서양학자의눈으로본중국소설" (2001), 예문서원
- 魯迅, "중국소설사" (2004), 소명출판
- 尹河炳, "中國古代小說觀考(先秦~唐代)", 중국인문과학, 7 (1988)
- 全寅初, "中國小說의 歷史的演變考", 人文科學 (1975)
- 全寅初, "先秦小說試探", 人文科學, 50 (1983)
- 왕비연, "從《文心雕龍》看劉勰對‘小說’的認識 - 以六朝志怪小說的部分敘事特點為中心 -", 중국문학, 87, pp.27~49 (2016), 한국중국어문학회
- 李昌集, "中國早期小說觀的歷史衍變", 文學遺產, 3 (1988)
- 劉鳳全, "先秦小說淺論", 語文學刊, 2 (1995)
- 陸林, "先秦小說觀念", 安徽大學學報(哲學社會科學版), 6 (1996)
- 袁文春, "先秦兩漢小說概念辨析", 信陽師範學院學報(哲學社會科學版), 31 (2011)
- 周偉民, "十四世紀以前中國小說理論批評的萌芽和演變", 華中師範學報, 4 (1985)