본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

葉燮 ≪原詩≫ 주요 術語의 의미지향 ― ‘才⋅膽⋅識⋅力’의 개념정의를 중심으로

A Study on Semantic Orientation of Major Terminology in Ye Xie’s Yuanshi

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

Ye Xie is a major literary critic of the Qing Dynasty period. The focus of existing research on his poetic theory is on poetry creation theory and poetic criticism. In particular, the argumentation towards his systematic view of poetry, which is based on the subjective and objective conditions of poetry creation, comprises an absolute majority of existing research. What I have noticed is that there is one point that is overlooked in these arguments. That is, the definition of the concept is not clear: the definition’s ambiguity of the concept for an implication of the main terminology presented in terms of subjective and objective condition by the author. To grasp and evaluate the thoughts and intentions contained in the main terminology of ancient writings at this point in time, I think that it is our priority to set up the identical “understanding structure” in order. To make an appropriate assessment, it is necessary to comprehensively consider the meanings of individual terms or paragraphs of the corresponding terminology in the context of the era environments, personal situations, and semantic relevances with other essays.

Abstract

Ye Xie is a major literary critic of the Qing Dynasty period. The focus of existing research on his poetic theory is on poetry creation theory and poetic criticism. In particular, the argumentation towards his systematic view of poetry, which is based on the subjective and objective conditions of poetry creation, comprises an absolute majority of existing research. What I have noticed is that there is one point that is overlooked in these arguments. That is, the definition of the concept is not clear: the definition’s ambiguity of the concept for an implication of the main terminology presented in terms of subjective and objective condition by the author. To grasp and evaluate the thoughts and intentions contained in the main terminology of ancient writings at this point in time, I think that it is our priority to set up the identical “understanding structure” in order. To make an appropriate assessment, it is necessary to comprehensively consider the meanings of individual terms or paragraphs of the corresponding terminology in the context of the era environments, personal situations, and semantic relevances with other essays.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. 葉 燮, "原诗" (1979), 人民文学出版社
  2. 葉 燮, "譯註原诗" (2012), 學古房
  3. 黄保真, "中国文学理论史" (1987), 北京出版社
  4. 葉 朗, "中国美学史大纲" (1985), 上海人民出版社
  5. 趙天一, "中國古典意象史論", 博士, pp.2012
  6. 韩丽君, "论作家之“膽”", 硕士, pp.2013
  7. 李曉峰, "王夫之詩學與葉燮詩學比較硏究", 碩士, pp.2003
  8. 尚 雯, "清代"才识"论研究", 硕士, pp.2013
  9. 张文秀, "中国古代诗"识"论研究", 硕士, pp.2013
  10. 최병학, "葉燮 ≪原詩≫의 術語問題 연구 Ⅰ", 중국학논총, (47), pp.71~90 (2015), 중국학연구소[DOI]
  11. 李元揆, "明⋅淸代 創作論의 發展樣相", 中國語文學論集, 9 (1997), 中國語文學硏究會
  12. 成復旺, "對葉燮詩歌創作論的思考", 文學遺産, 5 (1986)
  13. 鄧昭褀, "葉燮論杜甫 — "原詩"缺失初探", 文藝理論硏究, 4 (2007)
  14. 蒋 凡, "关于葉燮的学术思想", 学术月刊 (1984)
  15. 蔣述卓, ""原詩" 的詩人主體論", 古代文學理論硏究, 11 (1986)
  16. 姜仁达, "作家个性心理的理论建構與发展 ― 刘勰“才、氣、学、习”论與葉燮“才、膽、识、力”论比较", 云南蒙自師範高等专科学校学报, (1) (2001)
  17. 彭立勳, "論葉燮的審美學思想體系及其獨創性", 武漢理工大學學報, 29(1) (2016)
  18. 田義勇, "葉燮"原詩"的理論失敗及敎訓", 雲南大學學報, 8(3) (2009)
  19. 童庆炳, "有所“吐”才能有所“纳” — “才、膽、识、力”作为诗人的心理结構", 文史知识, 12 (1990)
  20. 刘惠文, "变而不失其正 ― 葉燮"原诗"论纲", 河北经贸大学学报(综合版), (1) (2003)
  21. 刘世文, "审美创作主体论及其价值 — 葉燮诗歌理论管窥", 乐山師範学院学报, (4) (2007)
  22. 王向荣, "“才、膽、识、力” : 葉燮对审美主体能力的建構與阐释", 安徽农业大学学报(社会科学版), (5) (2014)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)