조선과 에도문단의 중국 시문집 출판형태와 향유층 비교
Contrasting publication format and reader group of Chinese literature between Chosun and Edo
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this study, I tracked the re-publication and circulation of Chinese poetry in Chosun and Edo and observed their diverging ways of accommodating Chinese literature. In Chosun, Chinese poetry were mostly imported through diplomatic interactions. In case of Edo, which did not politically interact with Ming, most literature were commercially imported through Nagasaki(長崎). The imported poetry were re-edited and published in their own styles. In Chosun, they were first published in metal types and those with nation-wide demand were re-published on wood blocks by the government. Those favored by upper-class writers were also privately published by the publication organizations. Publication in Edo developed by the funding of the middle class. Educational organizations were in charge of publishing but the actual book manufacturing was done in connection with private book sellers. Another characteristics in Edo was the diverse editions with commentary, translation, or illustration. This reflects that the illiterate class also became the target consumers. The most contrasting feature between the two countries is that while the Chinese literature spread mostly among the elite class in Chosun, in Edo they transformed into mass culture in relation with commercial capital.
Abstract
In this study, I tracked the re-publication and circulation of Chinese poetry in Chosun and Edo and observed their diverging ways of accommodating Chinese literature. In Chosun, Chinese poetry were mostly imported through diplomatic interactions. In case of Edo, which did not politically interact with Ming, most literature were commercially imported through Nagasaki(長崎). The imported poetry were re-edited and published in their own styles. In Chosun, they were first published in metal types and those with nation-wide demand were re-published on wood blocks by the government. Those favored by upper-class writers were also privately published by the publication organizations. Publication in Edo developed by the funding of the middle class. Educational organizations were in charge of publishing but the actual book manufacturing was done in connection with private book sellers. Another characteristics in Edo was the diverse editions with commentary, translation, or illustration. This reflects that the illiterate class also became the target consumers. The most contrasting feature between the two countries is that while the Chinese literature spread mostly among the elite class in Chosun, in Edo they transformed into mass culture in relation with commercial capital.
참고문헌 (29)
- 김두종, "한국고인쇄기술사" (1974), 탐구당
- 김영진, "朝鮮 刊 『剪燈新話句解』 諸本 硏究(1) -異本 對比 및 系列化를 중심으로-", 어문논집, (65), pp.287~314 (2012), 민족어문학회
- 김영진, "포럼ㆍ그림과 책 2011논문집(1), 포럼ㆍ그림과 책" (2011)
- 김영진, "19세기 조선 지식인의 문화지형도" (2006), 한양대학교 출판부
- 김치우, ""고사촬요" 책판 목록과 그 수록 간본 연구" (2007), 아세아문화사
- 노경희, "세설신어보의 조선과 에도 문단의 출판과 향유 비교", 제7회 규장각 한국학 국제심포지엄 ｢동아시아 출판문화와 기록-지식의 형성과 유통｣ 발표문 (2014)
- 노경희, "동아시아의 문헌교류" (2014), 소명출판
- 노경희, "현종실록자본 『世說新語補』 간행과 流傳의 문화사적 의미", 한국한문학연구, (52), pp.498~532 (2013), 한국한문학회
- 노경희, "목판의 행간에서 조선의 지식문화를 읽다" (2013), 글항아리
- 노경희, "17세기 전반 조선과 18세기 에도 문단의 明代 前後七子 詩論 수용", 고전문학연구, (43), pp.401~445 (2013), 한국고전문학회
- 노경희, "17ㆍ18세기 조선과 에도 문단의 당시선집 수용과 간행 양상 비교 연구", 다산과 현대, 3 (2010), 연세대 강진다산실학연구원
- 박철상, "조선후기 상업출판의 전개과정", 연세대 동방학연구소 발표문 (2013)
- 옥영정, "17세기 출판문화의 변화와 서적간행의 양상", 다산과 현대, 3 (2010), 연세대 강진다산실학연구원
- 윤세순, "17세기, 간행본 서사류의 존재양상에 대하여", 민족문학사연구, (38), pp.132~159 (2008), 민족문학사학회
- 이재정, "洛東契字를 통해 본 조선시대 文人들의 지적 교류", 민족문화연구, (60), pp.359~386 (2013), 민족문화연구원
- 정형우, "한국의 책판목록" (1995), 연세대 국학연구원
- 천혜봉, "일본 蓬左文庫 한국전적" (2003), 지식산업사
- 王能軒, "世說新語硏究" (1992), 江蘇古籍出版社
- 大庭脩, "江戸時代における中国文化受容の研究" (1984), 同朋舎出版
- 吉川幸次郞, "日本思想大系 36" (1973), 岩波書店
- 稲田篤信, "和刻本 "世説新語補" の書り三種" (2013), 二松学舎大學
- 稲田篤信, "中井履軒 "世說新語補" 雕題本考" (2014), 二松学舎大學
- 高山大毅, "松学舎大学21紀COEプログラム ｢日本文學研究の世界的拠点の構築｣" (2011), 日本漢文学研究
- 今田洋三, "江戶の本屋さん-近世文化史の側面" (2009), 平凡社
- 日野龍夫, "古文辭派-儒学から文学へ", pp.14~15 (1975), 筑摩書房
- 船津富彦, "明淸文學論", pp.67~84 (1993), 汲古選書
- 東京印刷博物館, "江戸の印刷文化－家康は活字人間だった" (2000), 印刷博物館企画展圖錄
- 노경희, "명말 강남의 출판문화" (2007), 소명출판
- 宗村泉, "동아시아 금속활자인쇄문학의 창안과 과학성", 한국학중앙연구원 제1차 국제학술회의 발표문 (2012)