본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

≪新唐書≫의 ‘小說’ 인용 고찰

The Use of Xiao-Shuo(小說) in the New Tang History Book(新唐書)

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

This paper examines the “Xiao-Shuo” that is included in the New Tang History Book. Xiao-Shuo does not designate the modern concept of the novel or of narrative fiction, but instead refers to stories, legends and anecdotes that were spread by ordinary people. It was the term for inaccurate and unofficial records during the Tang-Song Dynasty, which today we know as Bi-ji(筆記, Miscellaneous Notes). Xiao-Shuo is often cited in the New Tang History Book, a work of official history(正史), because the authors felt it necessary to do so. This paper analyzes why, despite its shortcomings, the outstanding intellectuals of the Northern Song Dynasty engaged with Xiao-Shuo and required it as a source material for the New Tang History Book, and how Xiao-Shuo influenced the official historical narrative. It was widely perceived that the Old Tang History Book(舊唐書) was inadequate to the task of teaching its readers lessons on good and evil, and right and wrong. Given this, the scholars’ main focus in compiling the New Tang History Book was to impart moral lessons more effectively. By citing Xiao-Shuo, the New Tang History Book validated the exemplary actions of good people, and cast the bad actions of evil people in a negative light. In doing so, the text established a more rational, complete narrative. The fact that Xiao-Shuo was not an accurate account of history was disregarded, as morality and rationality were prioritized over accuracy. The New Tang History Book cited Xiao-Shuo in order to elaborate a more moral, complete historical narrative.

Abstract

This paper examines the “Xiao-Shuo” that is included in the New Tang History Book. Xiao-Shuo does not designate the modern concept of the novel or of narrative fiction, but instead refers to stories, legends and anecdotes that were spread by ordinary people. It was the term for inaccurate and unofficial records during the Tang-Song Dynasty, which today we know as Bi-ji(筆記, Miscellaneous Notes). Xiao-Shuo is often cited in the New Tang History Book, a work of official history(正史), because the authors felt it necessary to do so. This paper analyzes why, despite its shortcomings, the outstanding intellectuals of the Northern Song Dynasty engaged with Xiao-Shuo and required it as a source material for the New Tang History Book, and how Xiao-Shuo influenced the official historical narrative. It was widely perceived that the Old Tang History Book(舊唐書) was inadequate to the task of teaching its readers lessons on good and evil, and right and wrong. Given this, the scholars’ main focus in compiling the New Tang History Book was to impart moral lessons more effectively. By citing Xiao-Shuo, the New Tang History Book validated the exemplary actions of good people, and cast the bad actions of evil people in a negative light. In doing so, the text established a more rational, complete narrative. The fact that Xiao-Shuo was not an accurate account of history was disregarded, as morality and rationality were prioritized over accuracy. The New Tang History Book cited Xiao-Shuo in order to elaborate a more moral, complete historical narrative.

참고문헌 (15)

  1. 歐陽脩, "新唐書" (1997), 中華書局
  2. 劉昫, "舊唐書" (1997), 中華書局
  3. 司馬光, "資治通鑑" (1995), 中華書局
  4. 李昉, "太平廣記" (1995), 中華書局
  5. 劉餗, "隋唐嘉話⋅朝野僉載" (1997), 中華書局
  6. 王讜, "唐語林" (1997), 中華書局
  7. 洪邁, "容齋隨筆" (2009), 中華書局
  8. "唐五代筆記小說大觀" (2001), 上海古籍出版社
  9. 劉知幾, "史通通釋" (1978), 藝文印書館
  10. 永瑢, "四庫全書總目" (1995), 中華書局
  11. 章群, "通鑑, 新唐書引用筆記小說硏究" (1999), 文津出版社
  12. 王齊洲, "≪新唐書⋅藝文志≫著錄小說集解" (2009), 岳麓書社
  13. 周勛初, "唐代筆記小說敍錄" (2008), 鳳凰出版社
  14. 董乃斌, "諸朝正史中的小說與民間敍事", 文學評論, (5) (2006)
  15. 王慶華, "‘小说’何以进入‘正史’?—以≪新唐书≫传记增文採錄小说为例", 文藝硏究, (6) (2018)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)