본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

위대한 중화의 재림 — 중국 고고박물관의 공간 의미와 역사 기억

The Revival of the Great Chinese Civilization: The Spatial Significance and Historical Memory of Chinese Archaeological Museum

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

This study primarily examines how Chinese archaeological museum represents China from historical and cultural perspectives, focusing on two main aspects: the “spatial significance” and “historical memory” of this museum. In the section on “order and power,” it is revealed that the space of archaeological museum symbolically reflects China’s centralized power structure. The exhibition emphasizes China’s historical continuity and promote China’s political orientation. As a space of “ritual and sanctity,” the archaeological museum also plays a role in elevating collective identity and national pride among Chinese people. Additionally, it provides visitors with an experience that goes beyond simply learning about Chinese history, offering a sort of sacred experience. However, this process of sanctification not only provides a rite of passage that strengthens collective identity among Chinese visitors but also can make foreign visitors feel alienated as outsiders. As “a space for education and learning,” the archaeological museum effectively educates visitors about China’s history and culture by utilizing the latest digital technology. Through AI technology and digital exhibits, visitors are able to view ancient artifacts from various angles, thereby deepening their understanding of the historical context. These exhibition techniques enhance visitor immersion and effectively convey China’s historical legitimacy and ideology. Next, this study examines the “historical memory” of archaeological museum. The museum reconstructs “historical memory” around three themes: “Great unity of a nation[大國一統],” “Harmonious integration of all people[和融萬方],” and “National awakening[民族覺醒],” thus reinforcing the collective identity of the Chinese nation and legitimizing the governing ideology of modern China. By examining archaeological museum through the two frameworks of “spatial significance” and “historical memory,” this study confirms that this museum emphasizes the political orientation of modern China, reconstructs China’s historical identity, and plays a propagandistic role in educating the public about the continuity and superiority of Chinese civilization.

Abstract

This study primarily examines how Chinese archaeological museum represents China from historical and cultural perspectives, focusing on two main aspects: the “spatial significance” and “historical memory” of this museum. In the section on “order and power,” it is revealed that the space of archaeological museum symbolically reflects China’s centralized power structure. The exhibition emphasizes China’s historical continuity and promote China’s political orientation. As a space of “ritual and sanctity,” the archaeological museum also plays a role in elevating collective identity and national pride among Chinese people. Additionally, it provides visitors with an experience that goes beyond simply learning about Chinese history, offering a sort of sacred experience. However, this process of sanctification not only provides a rite of passage that strengthens collective identity among Chinese visitors but also can make foreign visitors feel alienated as outsiders. As “a space for education and learning,” the archaeological museum effectively educates visitors about China’s history and culture by utilizing the latest digital technology. Through AI technology and digital exhibits, visitors are able to view ancient artifacts from various angles, thereby deepening their understanding of the historical context. These exhibition techniques enhance visitor immersion and effectively convey China’s historical legitimacy and ideology. Next, this study examines the “historical memory” of archaeological museum. The museum reconstructs “historical memory” around three themes: “Great unity of a nation[大國一統],” “Harmonious integration of all people[和融萬方],” and “National awakening[民族覺醒],” thus reinforcing the collective identity of the Chinese nation and legitimizing the governing ideology of modern China. By examining archaeological museum through the two frameworks of “spatial significance” and “historical memory,” this study confirms that this museum emphasizes the political orientation of modern China, reconstructs China’s historical identity, and plays a propagandistic role in educating the public about the continuity and superiority of Chinese civilization.

참고문헌 (39)

  1. "明太祖實錄" (1962), 中央硏究院歷史言語硏究所
  2. 鄭和, "鄭和下西洋資料彙編中下" (1980), 齊魯書社
  3. 高明註, "大戴禮記今註今譯 一冊" (1981), 商務印書館
  4. 吳士連, "大越史記全書10" (1984), 東京大學東洋文化硏究所
  5. 嚴從簡, "殊域周咨錄" (1999), 上海古籍出版社
  6. 동북아역사재단, "史記外國傳譯註" (2009), 동북아역사재단
  7. 동북아역사재단, "漢書外國傳譯註" (2009), 동북아역사재단
  8. 동북아역사재단, "舊唐書外國傳譯註" (2011), 동북아역사재단
  9. 사마천, "史記列傳2" (2014), 민음사
  10. 거자오광, "전통 시기 중국의 안과 밖 : 중국과 주변 개념의 재인식" (2019), 소명출판사
  11. 고조선단군학회, "한사군 연구" (2022), 서경문화사
  12. 국사편찬위원회, "한국사4 ― 초기국가 고조선, 부여, 삼한" (2013), 국사편찬위원회
  13. 국제교과서연구소, "고대 동북아 연구 ― 어제와 오늘" (2008), 백산자료원
  14. 김경호, "하상주단대공정 ― 중국고대문명 연구의 허와 실" (2008), 동북아역사재단
  15. 김영민, "중국정치사상사" (2022), 사회평론 아카데미
  16. 김인희, "중국 애국주의와 고대사 만들기" (2021), 동북아역사재단
  17. 리쉐친, "의고 시대를 걸어 나오며", 글항아리
  18. 미셸 푸코, "말과 사물" (2012), 민음사
  19. 아놀드 반 제넵, "통과의례" (2022), 달을 긷는 우물
  20. 알라이다아스만, "기억의공간― 문화적기억의형식과변천" (2011), 그린비 출판사
  21. 王明珂, "중국 화하 변경과 중화민족" (2009), 동북아역사재단
  22. 윤내현, "고조선 연구 상" (2015), 만권당
  23. 이성무, "조선왕조실록" (2017), 살림출판사
  24. 존앤더슨, "문화, 장소, 흔적― 문화지리로세상읽기" (2013), 한울
  25. 吳唅, "李朝實錄中的中國史料1" (1980), 中華書局
  26. 중국 해상 실크로드 전략과 항만 네트워크 구축, "민귀식", 인천연구원, ~, pp.인차이나 브리프 (2020)
  27. 송정화, "명대 필기에 재현된 서역", 중국어문논총, 94 (2019), 중국어문연구회
  28. 윤용선, "박물관의 역사 전시: 집단 정체성 형성과 역사 정치의 문제", 세계 역사와 문화 연구, 43 (2017)
  29. 전인갑, "비대칭적국제질서: 천하질서, 그변용과현대적재구성(1) ― ‘세력균형질서’에서 ‘제국의 질서’로", 서강인문논총, 51 (2018), 서강대학교 인문과학연구소
  30. 累敏, "工會博覽" (2024), 北京市總工會
  31. 劉晉祥, "敖漢旗大甸子遺址1974年試掘簡報", 考古 (1975)
  32. 王苹, "內蒙古敖漢旗大甸子墓地出土彩繪陶器紋飾試析", 四川文物, (6) (2019)
  33. 夏鼐, "中國文明的起源", 文物, (8) (1985)
  34. 夏商周斷代工程專家組, "夏商周斷代工程1996-2000年階段成果報告(簡本)" (2000), 世界圖書出版公司
  35. 許紀霖, "新天下主義" (2015), 上海人民出版社
  36. 揚永康, "百獸率舞: 明代宮庭珍禽異獸豢養制度探析", 學術硏究 (2015)
  37. 張鵬, "北京支部生活" (2024), 北京日報報業集團
  38. Jan Assmann, "Das Kulturelle Gedächtnis: Schrift, Erinnerung und politische Identität in frühen Hockkulturen" (2002), C. H. Beck

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (16건)