본문 바로가기
KERD
논문

다목적 댐 및 다기능 보 운영을 고려한 대유역 SWAT 모형 구축기법 연구 - 남한강 유역을 대상으로 -

Large Scale SWAT Watershed Modeling Considering Multi - purpose Dams and Multi - function Weirs Operation - For Namhan River Basin -

2

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류농학

초록

This study is to evaluate the applicability of SWAT (Soil and Water Assessment Tool) model for multi-purpose dams and multi-function weirs operationin Namhan river basin (12,577 km²) of South Korea. The SWAT was calibrated (2005 ∼ 2009) and validated (2010 ∼ 2014) considering of 4multi-purpose dams and 3 multi-function weirs using daily observed dam inflow and storage, evapotranspiration, soil moisture, and groundwater leveldata. Firstly, the dam inflow was calibrated by the five steps; (step 1) the physical rate between total runoff and evapotranspiration was controlled byESCO, (step 2) the peak runoff was calibrated by CN, OV_N, and CH_N, (step 3) the baseflow was calibrated by GW_DELAY, (step 4) the recessioncurve of baseflow was calibrated by ALPHA_BF, (step 5) the flux between lateral flow and return flow was controlled by SOL_AWC and SOL_K, and(step 6) the flux between reevaporation and return flow was controlled by REVAPMN and GW_REVAP. Secondly, for the storage water levelcalibration, the SWAT emergency and principle spillway were applied for water level from design flood level to restricted water level for dam and frommaximum to management water level for weir respectively. Finally, the parameters for evapotranspiration (ESCO), soil water (SOL_AWC) andgroundwater level fluctuation (GWQMN, ALPHA_BF) were repeatedly adjusted by trial error method. For the dam inflow, the determination coefficientR² was above 0.80. The average Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) was from 0.59 to 0.88 and the RMSE was from 3.3 mm/day to 8.6 mm/day respectively. For the water balance performance, the PBIAS was between 9.4 and 21.4 %. For the dam storage volume, the R² was above 0.63 and the PBIAS wasbetween 6.3 and 13.5 % respectively. The average R² for evapotranspiration and soil moisture at CM (Cheongmicheon) site was 0.72 and 0.78, and theaverage R² for groundwater level was 0.59 and 0.60 at 2 YP (Yangpyeong) sites.

Abstract

This study is to evaluate the applicability of SWAT (Soil and Water Assessment Tool) model for multi-purpose dams and multi-function weirs operationin Namhan river basin (12,577 km²) of South Korea. The SWAT was calibrated (2005 ∼ 2009) and validated (2010 ∼ 2014) considering of 4multi-purpose dams and 3 multi-function weirs using daily observed dam inflow and storage, evapotranspiration, soil moisture, and groundwater leveldata. Firstly, the dam inflow was calibrated by the five steps; (step 1) the physical rate between total runoff and evapotranspiration was controlled byESCO, (step 2) the peak runoff was calibrated by CN, OV_N, and CH_N, (step 3) the baseflow was calibrated by GW_DELAY, (step 4) the recessioncurve of baseflow was calibrated by ALPHA_BF, (step 5) the flux between lateral flow and return flow was controlled by SOL_AWC and SOL_K, and(step 6) the flux between reevaporation and return flow was controlled by REVAPMN and GW_REVAP. Secondly, for the storage water levelcalibration, the SWAT emergency and principle spillway were applied for water level from design flood level to restricted water level for dam and frommaximum to management water level for weir respectively. Finally, the parameters for evapotranspiration (ESCO), soil water (SOL_AWC) andgroundwater level fluctuation (GWQMN, ALPHA_BF) were repeatedly adjusted by trial error method. For the dam inflow, the determination coefficientR² was above 0.80. The average Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) was from 0.59 to 0.88 and the RMSE was from 3.3 mm/day to 8.6 mm/day respectively. For the water balance performance, the PBIAS was between 9.4 and 21.4 %. For the dam storage volume, the R² was above 0.63 and the PBIAS wasbetween 6.3 and 13.5 % respectively. The average R² for evapotranspiration and soil moisture at CM (Cheongmicheon) site was 0.72 and 0.78, and theaverage R² for groundwater level was 0.59 and 0.60 at 2 YP (Yangpyeong) sites.

참고문헌 (23)

  1. 안소라, "SWAT과 MODSIM-DSS 모형을 연계한 금강유역의 농업용수 공급능력 평가", 대한토목학회논문집(국문), 33(2), pp.507~519 (2013), 대한토목학회[DOI]
  2. 안소라, "SWAT 모형을 이용한 미래 기후변화가 설마천 혼효림 유역의 증발산과 토양수분에 미치는 영향 평가", 한국수자원학회 논문집, 46(6), pp.569~583 (2013), 한국수자원학회
  3. Arnold, J.G, "Estimating hydrologic budgets for three Illinois watersheds", Journal of Hydrology, 176(1), pp.57~77 (1996)
  4. Chen, J, "The mechanism and scenarios of how mean annual runoff varies with climate change in Asian monsoon areas", Journal of Hydrology, 517, pp.595~606 (2014)
  5. 조형경, "설마천유역 혼효림에서 실측된 증발산과 토양수분을 이용한 SWAT모형의 적용성 평가", 한국농림기상학회지, 12(4), pp.289~297 (2010), 한국농림기상학회
  6. Joh, H.K, "Assessing climate change impact on hydrological components of a small forest watershed through SWAT calibration of evapotranspiration and soil moisture", Transactions of the ASABE, 54(5), pp.1773~1781 (2011)
  7. Kuczera, G, "Assessment of hydrological parameter uncertainty and the worth of multi-response data", Water Resources Research, 34, pp.1481~1489 (1998)
  8. K-water, "Dam operation handbook", ~ (2014)
  9. 이동률, "물 부족량 공급 운영 방식에 의한 다목적댐 물 공급의 안정성 평가", 한국수자원학회 논문집, 47(2), pp.195~206 (2014), 한국수자원학회
  10. National Water Resources Plan, "Ministry of Land", 2011~2020 (2011)
  11. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport, "Dam design standard", ~ (2011)
  12. Mkhwanazi, M, "Comparison of Large aperture scintillometer and satellitebased energy balance models in sensible heat flux and crop evapotranspiration determination", International Journal of Remote Sensing Applications, 12, pp.24~30 (2012)
  13. Molina-Navarro, E, "Hydrological and water quality impact assessment of a Mediterranean limno-reservoir under climate change and land use management scenarios", Journal of Hydrology, 509, pp.354~366 (2014)
  14. Moriasi, D.N, "Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations", Transactions of the ASABE, 50(3), pp.885~900 (2007)
  15. Nash, J.E, "River flow forecasting through conceptual models : Part I. A discussion of principles", Journal of Hydrology, 10(3), pp.282~290 (1970)
  16. Neitsch, S.L, "Soil and Water Assessment Tool; the theoretical documentation", U.S Agricultural Research Service, 340~367 (2001)
  17. Neitsch, S.L, "Soil and water assessment tool theoretical documentation version 2009", Texas Water Resources Institute, ~ (2011)
  18. 박종윤, "RCP 배출 시나리오와 SWAT 모형을 이용한 기후변화가 용담댐 유역의 수문요소에 미치는 영향 평가", 한국농공학회논문집, 56(3), pp.19~29 (2014), 한국농공학회
  19. Perrin, "Assessing water availability in a semi-arid watershed of southern India using a semi-distributed model", Journal of Hydrology, 460, pp.143~155 (2012)
  20. Santhi, C, "Validation of the SWAT model on a large river basin with point and nonpoint sources", Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 37, pp.1169~1188 (2001)
  21. Seibert, J, "The quest for an improved dialog between modeler and experimentalist", Water Science and Applications, 6, pp.301~316 (2003)
  22. 신형진, "관측자료와 RHESSys 모형을 이용한 산림유역의 생태수문 적용성 평가 -설마천유역을 대상으로-", 한국수자원학회 논문집, 45(12), pp.1293~1307 (2012), 한국수자원학회
  23. Wagner, P.D, "Dynamic integration of land use changes in a hydrologic assessment of a rapidly developing Indian catchment", Science of the Total Environment, 539, pp.153~164 (2016)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)