본문 바로가기
KERD
논문

유역단위 유출 모형 별 기저유출 분석 기법 검토

A Review of Baseflow Analysis Techniques of Watershed-Scale Runoff Models

0

조회

0

다운로드

8

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류농학

초록

Streamflow is composed of baseflow and direct runoff. However, most of streamflow during dry seasons depends on baseflow. Thus, baseflow analysisis very important to simulate streamflow of dry seasons. Generally, baseflow analysis is conducted using watershed-scale runoff models due to diffilcultyof measuring baseflow. However, it is needed to understand and review how the model simulates baseflow because each model uses inherent baseflowanalysis techniques. In this study, SWAT, HSPF, PRMS-IV were reviewed focusing on baseflow and soil water. HSPF and PRMS-IV calculate baseflowusing the variables which depends on user, so the baseflow analysis results of HSPF and PRMS-IV are not consistent. Moreover, soil structures whichwere assumed from HSPF and PRMS-IV, since these two models assume soil structure as two soil zones and three conceptual reservoirs, were not enoughto describe real soil structure. On the other hand, baseflow in SWAT is calculated using baseflow recession constant which can consider thecharacteristics of aquifer and also, soil structure in SWAT is similar to real soil structures. Thus, baseflow analysis result from SWAT was concluded asthe most suitable and reliable model because SWAT can reflect the characteristics and soil structure which is close to reality.

Abstract

Streamflow is composed of baseflow and direct runoff. However, most of streamflow during dry seasons depends on baseflow. Thus, baseflow analysisis very important to simulate streamflow of dry seasons. Generally, baseflow analysis is conducted using watershed-scale runoff models due to diffilcultyof measuring baseflow. However, it is needed to understand and review how the model simulates baseflow because each model uses inherent baseflowanalysis techniques. In this study, SWAT, HSPF, PRMS-IV were reviewed focusing on baseflow and soil water. HSPF and PRMS-IV calculate baseflowusing the variables which depends on user, so the baseflow analysis results of HSPF and PRMS-IV are not consistent. Moreover, soil structures whichwere assumed from HSPF and PRMS-IV, since these two models assume soil structure as two soil zones and three conceptual reservoirs, were not enoughto describe real soil structure. On the other hand, baseflow in SWAT is calculated using baseflow recession constant which can consider thecharacteristics of aquifer and also, soil structure in SWAT is similar to real soil structures. Thus, baseflow analysis result from SWAT was concluded asthe most suitable and reliable model because SWAT can reflect the characteristics and soil structure which is close to reality.

참고문헌 (40)

  1. Albek, M, "Hydrological modeling of Seydi Suyu watershed (Turkey) with HSPF", Journal of Hydrology, 285(1), pp.260~271 (2004)
  2. Arnold, J.G, "Automated methods for estimating baseflow and ground water recharge from streamflow records1" (1999), Wiley Online Library
  3. Atkins, J.T, "Calibration parameters used to simulate streamflow from application of the Hydrologic Simulation Program-FORTRAN model (HSPF) to mountainous basins containing coal mines in West Virginia, US Department of the Interior", US Geological Survey, ~ (2005)
  4. 배다혜, "HSPF를 이용한 비점오염원 삭감에 따른 효과 분석", 환경영향평가, 20(1), pp.71~78 (2011), 한국환경영향평가학회
  5. Brodie, R.S, "A review of techniques for analysing baseflow from stream hydrographs", Proceedings of the NZHS-IAH-NZSSS 2005 conference, pp.28~ (2005)
  6. Brun, S.E, "Simulating runoff behavior in an urbanizing watershed", Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 24(1), pp.5~22 (2000)
  7. Caldwell, P.V, "A comparison of hydrologic models for ecological flows and water availability", Ecohydrology, 8(8), pp.1525~1546 (2015)
  8. Chalise, D.R, "Evaluating temporal and spatial scale issues with hydrologic models in the Black hills, South Dakota", Mines and Technology, pp.2013
  9. Cherkauer, D.S, "Quantifying ground water recharge at multiple scales using PRMS and GIS", Ground Water, 42(1), pp.97~110 (2004)
  10. Cho, J, "Simulation of land use impacts on groundwater levels and streamflow in a Virginia watershed", Agricultural water management, 96(10), pp.1~11 (2005)
  11. Cho, S.H, "Computation of baseflow contribution to streamflow using environmental tracers in three small catchments Yuseong", Ph.D, pp.2006
  12. Dams, J, "Multi-model approach to assess the impact of climate change on runoff", Journal of Hydrology, 529, pp.1601~1616 (2015)
  13. Golmohammadi, G, "Evaluating three hydrological distributed watershed models : MIKE-SHE, APEX, SWAT", Hydrology, 1(1), pp.20~39 (2014)
  14. Gupta, V.K, "Uniqueness and observability of conceptual rainfall‐runoff model parameters : The percolation process examined", Water Resources Research, 19(1), pp.269~276 (1983)
  15. 한정호, "낙동강 수계에서의 하천유량 변동성과 기저유출 기여도의 관계 분석", 한국농공학회논문집, 58(1), pp.27~38 (2016), 한국농공학회
  16. Kihubyeonhwa daeeung mirae sujawonjeonryak, , Ministry of Construction Transportation, ~ (2010)
  17. Leavesley, G, "The precipitationrunoff modeling system-PRMS", Computer models of watershed hydrology, pp.281~310 (1995)
  18. Lee, G, "Development of Web-based RECESS model for estimating baseflow using SWAT", Sustainability, 6(4), pp.2357~2378 (2014)
  19. Lim, K. J, "Automated web gis based hydrograph analysis tool, WHAT1" (2005), Wiley Online Library
  20. Lee, K. Karl, "Estimates of ground-water recharge, base flow, and stream reach gains and losses in the Willamette River Basin, Oregon", US Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey, ~ (2002)
  21. Luo, Y, "Baseflow simulation using SWAT model in an inland river basin in Tianshan Mountains, Northwest China", Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 16(4), pp.1259~1267 (2012)
  22. Markstrom, S. L, "PRMS-IV, the precipitation-runoff modeling system, version 4. US Geological Survey Techniques and Methods", B6~B7 (2015)
  23. Soil and Water Assessment Tool. User’s Manual, Version 2009, "Neitsch, S", Texas Water Resources Institute, Technical Report, ~ (2010)
  24. Peterson, J, "Hydrologic calibration of the SWAT model in a watershed containing fragipan soils1" (1998), Wiley Online Library
  25. Rutledge, A, "Computer programs for describing the recession of ground-water discharge and for estimating mean ground-water recharge and discharge from streamflow records : Update, US Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey", ~ (1998)
  26. Ryu, J, "Development and Evaluation of ArcGIS-based watershed-scale Long-term Hydrologic Impact Assessment (L-THIA)ACN-WQ system", Ph.D, pp.2016
  27. 류지철, "SWAT HRU Mapping module을 이용한 해안면 만대천 유역의 토지이용별 지하수 함양량 평가", 한국물환경학회지, 28(5), pp.743~753 (2012), 한국물환경학회
  28. 류지철, "소양강댐 유역의 유출 자동보정을 위한 SWAT-CUP의 적용 및 평가", 한국물환경학회지, 28(3), pp.347~358 (2012), 한국물환경학회[DOI]
  29. Said, A, "Calibration of HSPF using active ground water storage", World Environmental and Water Resources Congress, pp.342~342 (2007)
  30. Said, A, "Estimating water budget in a regional aquifer using HSPF‐MODFLOW intergrated MODEL1", Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 41(1), pp.55~66 (2005)
  31. Saleh, A, "Evaluation of SWAT and HSPF within BASINS program for the upper North Bosque River watershed in central Texas", Transactions of the ASAE, 47(4), pp.1039~ (2004)
  32. Singh, J, "Hydrological modeling of the iroquois river watershed using HSPF and SWAT1" (2005), Wiley Online Library
  33. HYSEP, a computer program for streamflow hydrograph separation and analysis, "Sloto, R. A", US Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey, ~ (1996)
  34. Sobel, R, "Refinement and application of a coupled tidal prism model with HSPF for managing bacterial water quality impairment in a coastal watershed", WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 197, pp.201~209 (2015)
  35. Spruill, C, "Simulation of daily and monthly stream discharge from small watersheds using the SWAT model", Transactions of the ASAE, 43(6), pp.1431~ (2000)
  36. "Ministry of Construction Transportation", Sujawonjabgkijonghapkyehoek, ~ (2006)
  37. "Sujawonjabgkijonghapkyehoek", Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, ~ (2011)
  38. Srinivasan, "SWAT ungauged : hydrological budget and crop yield predictions in the Upper Mississippi River Basin", Transactions of the ASABE, 53(5), pp.1533~1546 (2010)
  39. Verma, A. K, "Evaluation of HEC-HMS and WEPP for simulating watershed runoff using remote sensing and geographical information system", Paddy and Water Environment, 8(2), pp.131~144 (2010)
  40. Zhang, X, "Simultaneous calibration of surface flow and baseflow simulations : a revisit of the SWAT model calibration framework", Hydrological Processes, 25(14), pp.2313~2320 (2011)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)