본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

History of, and History in, Sophistopolis

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This article originates with a presentation given at the conference celebrating the 20th anniversary of the Rhetoric Society of Korea. It introduces Sophistopolis, the fictional Greco-Roman city state that forms the background to controversiae, i.e., mock-forensic speeches composed and delivered both by students in the rhetor’s school and by their teachers and the literary elite. Section 1 provides a very brief introduction to the genre. Section 2 is concerned with the history of Roman declamation. While not pretending to be exhaustive it does address the Greek roots of the genre, the probable time of its arrival in Rome, and the four collections of declamations we have left. In section 3, I zoom in on the actual practice of Roman declamation, briefly discussing the Roman curriculum before devoting attention to the suasoria, the mockdeliberative speech students were required to have mastered before embarking on controversiae. I show how extant suasoriae have a basis in collective memory, which is not the case for the majority of controversiae. These are played out in Sophistopolis, the subject of section 4. After a discussion of the character and function of Sophistopolitan laws, I discuss the way it figures in controversiae, using the example of Decl. mai. 7, The Poor Man’s Torture. Then I give a brief survey of the fictional city’s political situation and, by means of a number of examples, its other inhabitants and their conflicts and problems. Section 5 and 6 take us to the theme of the conference. Section 5 is an attempt to give a brief history of Sophistopolis, trying to sketch how the character of this city, with its peculiar laws, its quarrelsome inhabitants and their adventures, came to be developed in the schools. In section 6 I take a look at the rare appearance of figures from history in Sophistopolis. I conclude that their fates and actions are adapted to fit Sophistopolitan scenarios while they themselves are made to resemble Sophistopolitan stock characters.

Abstract

This article originates with a presentation given at the conference celebrating the 20th anniversary of the Rhetoric Society of Korea. It introduces Sophistopolis, the fictional Greco-Roman city state that forms the background to controversiae, i.e., mock-forensic speeches composed and delivered both by students in the rhetor’s school and by their teachers and the literary elite. Section 1 provides a very brief introduction to the genre. Section 2 is concerned with the history of Roman declamation. While not pretending to be exhaustive it does address the Greek roots of the genre, the probable time of its arrival in Rome, and the four collections of declamations we have left. In section 3, I zoom in on the actual practice of Roman declamation, briefly discussing the Roman curriculum before devoting attention to the suasoria, the mockdeliberative speech students were required to have mastered before embarking on controversiae. I show how extant suasoriae have a basis in collective memory, which is not the case for the majority of controversiae. These are played out in Sophistopolis, the subject of section 4. After a discussion of the character and function of Sophistopolitan laws, I discuss the way it figures in controversiae, using the example of Decl. mai. 7, The Poor Man’s Torture. Then I give a brief survey of the fictional city’s political situation and, by means of a number of examples, its other inhabitants and their conflicts and problems. Section 5 and 6 take us to the theme of the conference. Section 5 is an attempt to give a brief history of Sophistopolis, trying to sketch how the character of this city, with its peculiar laws, its quarrelsome inhabitants and their adventures, came to be developed in the schools. In section 6 I take a look at the rare appearance of figures from history in Sophistopolis. I conclude that their fates and actions are adapted to fit Sophistopolitan scenarios while they themselves are made to resemble Sophistopolitan stock characters.

참고문헌 (34)

  1. Bonner, S. F., "Roman Declamation in the Late Republic and Early Empire" (1949), Liverpool University Press
  2. Bonner, S. F., "Education in Ancient Rome" (1977), Methuen & Co
  3. Breij, B. M. C., "Vitae Necisque Potestas in Roman Declamation", Advances in the History of Rhetoric, 9, pp.1~25 (2006)
  4. Breij, B. M. C., "Law and Ethics in Roman Declamation", pp.219~248 (2015), De Gruyter
  5. Breij, B. M. C., "The Poor Man’s Torture (Major Declamations, 7)" (2020), Edizioni Università di Cassino
  6. Caplan, H., "Ad Herennium" (1954), Harvard University Press
  7. Emlyn-Jones, C., "Plato: Lysis, Symposium, Phaedrus" (2022), Harvard University Press
  8. Fairweather, J., "Seneca the Elder" (1981), Cambridge University Press
  9. Feddern, S., "Die Suasorien des älteren Seneca" (2013), De Gruyter
  10. Gagarin, M., "The Nature of Proofs in Antiphon", Classical Philology, 85, pp.22~32 (1990)
  11. Gunderson, E., "Declamation, Paternity, and Roman Identity: Authority and the Rhetorical Self" (2003), Cambridge University Press
  12. Håkanson, L., "Calpurnii Flacci declamationum excerpta" (1978), Teubner
  13. Håkanson, L., "Declamationes XIX Quintiliano falso ascriptae" (1982), Teubner
  14. Håkanson, L., "Unveröffentlichte Schriften, Bd. 1: Studien zu den pseudoquintilianischen Declamationes maiores, ed. B. Santorelli" (2014), De Gruyter
  15. Hömke, N., "Gesetzt den Fall, ein Geist erscheint: Komposition und Motivik der ps-quintilianischen Declamationes maiores X,XIV,und XV" (2002), Winter
  16. De optimo genere oratorum, "Cicero De inventione", pp.Harvard University Press, topica
  17. Kennedy, G. A., "The Art of Persuasion in Greece" (1963), Princeton University Press
  18. Knoch, S., "Die lateinische Deklamation" (2021), Georg Olms Verlag
  19. Lanfranchi, F., "Il diritto nei retori romani" (1938), Giuffrè
  20. Lentano, M., "«Un nome più grande di qualsiasi legge». Declamazione latina e patria potestas", Bollettino di studi latini, 34(2), pp.558~589 (2005)
  21. Miles, G., "Philostratus, Eunapius. Lives of Philosophers and Sophists" (2023), Harvard University Press
  22. Reinhardt, T., "Quintilian Book 2" (2006), Oxford University Press
  23. Roller, M. B., "Color-Blindness: Cicero’s Death, Declamation, and the Production of History", Classical Philology, 92, pp.109~130 (1997)
  24. Russell, D. A., "Greek Declamation" (1983), Cambridge University Press
  25. Shackleton Bailey, D. R., ", The lesser declamations (2 vols.)" (2006), Harvard University Press
  26. Stramaglia, A., "I gemelli malati: Un caso di vivisezione (Declamazioni maggiori, 8)" (1999), Edizioni Università di Cassino
  27. Stramaglia, A., "L’Astrologo (Declamazioni maggiori, 4)" (2013), Edizioni Università di Cassino
  28. Stramaglia, A., "The major declamations (3 vols.)" (2021), Harvard University Press
  29. Sussman, L. A., "The Declamations of Calpurnius Flaccus" (1994), Brill
  30. Van Mal-Maeder, D., "La fiction des déclamation" (2007), Brill
  31. Winterbottom, M., "Seneca the Elder: Declamations (2 vols.)" (1974), Harvard University Press
  32. Winterbottom, M., "The minor declamations ascribed to Quintilian" (1984), De Gruyter
  33. Zinsmaier, Th., "Die Hände der blinden Mutter (Gröβere Deklamationen, 6)" (2005), Edizioni Università di Cassino
  34. Zinsmaier, Th, "Zw ischen Erzählung und Argumentation: colores in den pseudoquintilianischen Declamationes maiores", Rhetorica, 27(3), pp.256~273 (2009)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)