본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Butterfly Cartilage Tympanoplasty Long-term Results: Excellent Treatment Method in Small and Medium Sized Perforations

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Objectives. The aim of this study was to evaluate and report the long-term results of the butterfly cartilage tympanoplasty. Short-term and long-term hearing outcomes were compared according to age and perforation location as well. Methods. Ninety-three patients who were diagnosed with noncomplicated chronic otitis media and underwent microscopic transcanal butterfly cartilage tympanoplasty due to anterior, posterior, and central tympanic membrane perforation were included. Age, gender, follow-up time, pre- and postoperative pure tone audiometry thresholds (both air and bone conduction), pre- and postoperative air-bone gaps (ABGs), if any residual perforation was noted. Results. At the end of the follow-up period, successful closure occurred in 88 of 93 patients and success rate is 94.6%. In all patients, including those with residual perforations, the mean preoperative bone conduction threshold was 15.9 dB (range, 5 to 50 dB) among all groups whereas mean air conduction threshold was 36.4±15.1 dB (range, 10 to 90 dB) preoperatively and 28.8±14.3 dB in 6th month follow-up and 24.9±14.1 dB 24th month follow-up. Preoperative mean ABG was 22.1±7.1 dB (range, 5 to 40 dB) whereas 13.3±5.9 dB 6 months after surgery and 11.9±5.5 dB 24 months after surgery. There was a significant difference between pre- and postoperative ABG in both 6th and 24th month follow-up (P6 mo–24 mo<0.05). Furthermore, preoperative mean air conduction differed significantly from postoperative 6th and 24th month follow-up mean air conduction thresholds (P<0.05). Conclusion. We suggested that butterfly cartilage tympanoplasty can be safely performed in small, moderate, and even large perforations, as the hearing outcomes and successful closure rate are similar to those of other surgical methods. Moreover, it can be performed under local anaesthesia and it has low complication rates.

Abstract

Objectives. The aim of this study was to evaluate and report the long-term results of the butterfly cartilage tympanoplasty. Short-term and long-term hearing outcomes were compared according to age and perforation location as well. Methods. Ninety-three patients who were diagnosed with noncomplicated chronic otitis media and underwent microscopic transcanal butterfly cartilage tympanoplasty due to anterior, posterior, and central tympanic membrane perforation were included. Age, gender, follow-up time, pre- and postoperative pure tone audiometry thresholds (both air and bone conduction), pre- and postoperative air-bone gaps (ABGs), if any residual perforation was noted. Results. At the end of the follow-up period, successful closure occurred in 88 of 93 patients and success rate is 94.6%. In all patients, including those with residual perforations, the mean preoperative bone conduction threshold was 15.9 dB (range, 5 to 50 dB) among all groups whereas mean air conduction threshold was 36.4±15.1 dB (range, 10 to 90 dB) preoperatively and 28.8±14.3 dB in 6th month follow-up and 24.9±14.1 dB 24th month follow-up. Preoperative mean ABG was 22.1±7.1 dB (range, 5 to 40 dB) whereas 13.3±5.9 dB 6 months after surgery and 11.9±5.5 dB 24 months after surgery. There was a significant difference between pre- and postoperative ABG in both 6th and 24th month follow-up (P6 mo–24 mo<0.05). Furthermore, preoperative mean air conduction differed significantly from postoperative 6th and 24th month follow-up mean air conduction thresholds (P<0.05). Conclusion. We suggested that butterfly cartilage tympanoplasty can be safely performed in small, moderate, and even large perforations, as the hearing outcomes and successful closure rate are similar to those of other surgical methods. Moreover, it can be performed under local anaesthesia and it has low complication rates.

참고문헌 (19)

  1. Zollner F, "The principles of plastic surgery of the sound-conducting apparatus", J Laryngol Otol, 69(10), pp.637~652 (1955)[DOI]
  2. Wullstein H, "Theory and practice of tympanoplasty", Laryngoscope, 66(8), pp.1076~1093 (1956)
  3. Kim HJ, "Functional and practical outcomes of inlay butterfly cartilage tympanoplasty", Otol Neurotol, 35(8), pp.1458~1462 (2014)[DOI]
  4. Eavey RD, "Inlay tympanoplasty: cartilage butterfly technique", Laryngoscope, 108(5), pp.657~661 (1998)[DOI]
  5. Dornhoffer JL, "Hearing results with cartilage tympanoplasty", Laryngoscope, 107(8), pp.1094~1099 (1997)[DOI]
  6. Kartush JM, "Tympanic membrane Patcher: a new device to close tympanic membrane perforations in an office setting", Am J Otol, 21(5), pp.615~620 (2000)
  7. Alain H, "Butterfly myringoplasty for total, subtotal, and annular perforations", Laryngoscope, 126(11), pp.2565~2568 (2016)[DOI]
  8. Ghanem MA, "Butterfly cartilage graft inlay tympanoplasty for large perforations", Laryngoscope, 116(10), pp.1813~1816 (2006)[DOI]
  9. Bhattacharya SN, "Comparison of a microsliced modified chondroperichondrium shield graft and a temporalis fascia graft in primary type I tympanoplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial", Ear Nose Throat J, 95(7), pp.274~283 (2016)
  10. Mauri M, "Evaluation of inlay butterfly cartilage tympanoplasty: a randomized clinical trial", Laryngoscope, 111(8), pp.1479~1485 (2001)[DOI]
  11. Glasscock ME 3rd, "Postauricular undersurface tympanic membrane grafting: a follow-up report", Laryngoscope, 92(7), pp.718~727 (1982)[DOI]
  12. Pei-Wen Wu, "Comparison of Short- and Long-term Hearing Outcomes of Successful Inlay Cartilage Tympanoplasty Between Small and Large Eardrum Perforations", Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology, 8(4), pp.359~363 (2015), 대한이비인후과학회[DOI]
  13. Riss JC, "Butterfly-cartilage tympanoplasty in children: a 28-case series and literature review", Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis, 133(3), pp.179~182 (2016)[DOI]
  14. Ulku CH, "Inlay butterfly cartilage tympanoplasty: anatomic and functional results", Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (2017)
  15. Mehta RP, "Determinants of hearing loss in perforations of the tympanic membrane", Otol Neurotol, 27(2), pp.136~143 (2006)[DOI]
  16. 박하나로, "Determinants of Conductive Hearing Loss in Tympanic Membrane Perforation", Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology, 8(2), pp.92~96 (2015), 대한이비인후과학회[DOI]
  17. Tos M, "Tympanoplasty and age", Arch Otolaryngol, 96(6), pp.493~498 (1972)[DOI]
  18. Kessler A, "Type 1 tympanoplasty in children", Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 120(5), pp.487~490 (1994)[DOI]
  19. Rozendorn N, "Myringoplasty in children", Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 90, pp.245~250 (2016)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)