영월읍 농촌중심지활성화 사업 모니터링 결과 분석- 2018년 지역역량강화 프로그램을 중심으로 -
The Monitoring and Evaluation of the Community Central Revitalization Project in Yeongwol - Focusing on the Community Empowerment Project in 2018 -
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The present study aims to monitor three of the community empowerment projects implemented as part of the community central revitalization projectsin Yeongwol. We used an established indicator (i.e., quantitative evaluation) as well as an interview (i.e., qualitative evaluation) throughout themonitoring process. The PM (project manager) committee members, consisting of six interdisciplinary experts, carried out the monitoring from 24th ofOctober until the 26th of November 2018. We categorized the results of the monitoring into the aspects of needs, software, and hardware, and analyzedthem as follows: First, although the locals were willing to take part in programs, they were in overall not well informed about the ongoing programsand the program that suits their needs the most. The service organization should therefore actively publicize the program and provide sufficientinformation about it .Second, instead of a one-off program, the locals should be empowered to take over the program eventually and develop it as alocal business model. Last, the locals from the center as well as the outskirts of Yeongwol should organize a learning net, collaboratively develop afurther program, and assess its effectiveness by employing a thorough monitoring system.
Abstract
The present study aims to monitor three of the community empowerment projects implemented as part of the community central revitalization projectsin Yeongwol. We used an established indicator (i.e., quantitative evaluation) as well as an interview (i.e., qualitative evaluation) throughout themonitoring process. The PM (project manager) committee members, consisting of six interdisciplinary experts, carried out the monitoring from 24th ofOctober until the 26th of November 2018. We categorized the results of the monitoring into the aspects of needs, software, and hardware, and analyzedthem as follows: First, although the locals were willing to take part in programs, they were in overall not well informed about the ongoing programsand the program that suits their needs the most. The service organization should therefore actively publicize the program and provide sufficientinformation about it .Second, instead of a one-off program, the locals should be empowered to take over the program eventually and develop it as alocal business model. Last, the locals from the center as well as the outskirts of Yeongwol should organize a learning net, collaboratively develop afurther program, and assess its effectiveness by employing a thorough monitoring system.
참고문헌 (13)
- Guideline: Completing a quality at implementation report, "The Australian Agency for International Development", AusAID, ~ (2011)
- Chen, H. T., "Practical Program Evaluation" (2005), Sage Publication, Inc
- Canadian International Development Agency, "CIDA evaluation guide", Canada Evaluation Division Performance & Knowledge Management Branch, ~ (2004)
- Department for International Development, "Monitoring and evaluation framework: Breaking the cycle: Saving lives and protecting the future", ~ (2011)
- 주경필, "대학부설 평생교육기관 프로그램의 모니터링을 위한 평가준거체제 개발 연구", Andragogy Today: Interdisciplinary Journal of Adult & Continuing Education (IJACE), 11(1), pp.27~55 (2008), 한국성인교육학회[DOI]
- Ministry of Agriculture, Food and community Affairs, "Revitalization of community development project", ~ (2018)
- MOE, "White paper on lifelong education" (2004), MOEㆍKEDI
- Annual report Japan’s ODA evaluation 2011, "Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan", MOFA, ~ (2011)
- Mohr, L. B., "Impact Analysis for Program Evaluation" (1995), Sage Publication, Inc
- 오혁진, "성인교육 프로그램에 대한 학습자의 평가준거 연구", 박사, 평생교육, pp.2000
- Poster. J. J., "Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation" (2004), John Wiley and Sons
- Rossi, P. H., "Evaluation: A Systematic Approach", pp.171~172 (2004), Sage Publication, Inc
- Walter, J. D., "Monitoring for government agencies", The Urban Institute, ~ (1976)