Efficacy and Safety of Guardcel Nasal Packing After Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A Prospective, Single-Blind, Randomized Controlled Study
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives. Nasal packing after endoscopic sinus surgery is frequently used to control postoperative bleeding, enhance the wound healing process, and prevent lateralization of the middle turbinate, which causes insufficient ventilation. Many biodegradable materials have been developed to reduce pain and mucosal damage during packing removal. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of Guardcel (Genewel Co.) middle meatal packing with a traditional nonabsorbable middle meatal packing, Merocel (Medtronic Xomed), on wound healing and patient satisfaction. Methods. In this prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled study, we enrolled 32 consecutive patients (64 nostrils) undergoing bilateral endoscopic sinus surgery at Korea University Guro Hospital from February 2015 to August 2015. Guardcel and Merocel were inserted postoperatively into a randomly assigned side. Objective findings about bleeding, hemostasis, adhesion, and infection were evaluated with nasal endoscopy. Patients’ symptoms including pain and nasal obstruction were evaluated with a visual analog scale. Each evaluation was done at 2–3 days, 1 week, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks after surgery. Results. At 2–3 days after endoscopic sinus surgery, the Guardcel side had a significantly less hemostasis time than the Merocel side (P=0.001). During this period, the pain during packing removal was significantly lower on the Guardcel-inserted side than the Merocel-inserted side (P=0.002). At two weeks after surgery, the adhesion score on the Guardcel side was significantly lower than that of the Merocel side (P=0.011). Other parameters during the study follow-up periods were not statistically significant. There were no severe adverse reactions. Conclusion. Guardcel, a newly developed packing material, appeared to shorten the hemostasis time and reduce pain sensation at 2–3 days after surgery; it also prevented adhesion formation 2 weeks after surgery when compared with the control. Guardcel can be an effective and safe candidate to replace conventional packing materials after endoscopic sinus surgery.
Abstract
Objectives. Nasal packing after endoscopic sinus surgery is frequently used to control postoperative bleeding, enhance the wound healing process, and prevent lateralization of the middle turbinate, which causes insufficient ventilation. Many biodegradable materials have been developed to reduce pain and mucosal damage during packing removal. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of Guardcel (Genewel Co.) middle meatal packing with a traditional nonabsorbable middle meatal packing, Merocel (Medtronic Xomed), on wound healing and patient satisfaction. Methods. In this prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled study, we enrolled 32 consecutive patients (64 nostrils) undergoing bilateral endoscopic sinus surgery at Korea University Guro Hospital from February 2015 to August 2015. Guardcel and Merocel were inserted postoperatively into a randomly assigned side. Objective findings about bleeding, hemostasis, adhesion, and infection were evaluated with nasal endoscopy. Patients’ symptoms including pain and nasal obstruction were evaluated with a visual analog scale. Each evaluation was done at 2–3 days, 1 week, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks after surgery. Results. At 2–3 days after endoscopic sinus surgery, the Guardcel side had a significantly less hemostasis time than the Merocel side (P=0.001). During this period, the pain during packing removal was significantly lower on the Guardcel-inserted side than the Merocel-inserted side (P=0.002). At two weeks after surgery, the adhesion score on the Guardcel side was significantly lower than that of the Merocel side (P=0.011). Other parameters during the study follow-up periods were not statistically significant. There were no severe adverse reactions. Conclusion. Guardcel, a newly developed packing material, appeared to shorten the hemostasis time and reduce pain sensation at 2–3 days after surgery; it also prevented adhesion formation 2 weeks after surgery when compared with the control. Guardcel can be an effective and safe candidate to replace conventional packing materials after endoscopic sinus surgery.
참고문헌 (11)
- Benninger MS, "Adult chronic rhinosinusitis: definitions, diagnosis, epidemiology, and pathophysiology", Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 129(3 Suppl), pp.S1~S32 (2003)
- Kim YS, "Prevalence and risk factors of chronic rhinosinusitis in Korea", Am J Rhinol Allergy, 25(3), pp.117~121 (2011)
- Govindaraj S, "Endoscopic sinus surgery: evolution and technical innovations", J Laryngol Otol, 124(3), pp.242~250 (2010)
- Valentine R, "Advances in absorbable biomaterials and nasal packing", Otolaryngol Clin North Am, 42(5), pp.813~828 (2009)
- Yan M, "Biodegradable nasal packings for endoscopic sinonasal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis", PLoS One, 9(12), pp.e115458~ (2014)
- Berlucchi M, "Endoscopic outcomes of resorbable nasal packing after functional endoscopic sinus surgery: a multicenter prospective randomized controlled study", Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 266(6), pp.839~845 (2009)
- Shoman N, "Prospective, double-blind, randomized trial evaluating patient satisfaction, bleeding, and wound healing using biodegradable synthetic polyurethane foam (NasoPore) as a middle meatal spacer in functional endoscopic sinus surgery", J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 38(1), pp.112~118 (2009)
- Mo JH, "No packing versus packing after endoscopic sinus surgery: pursuit of patients’ comfort after surgery", Am J Rhinol, 22(5), pp.525~528 (2008)
- Leunig A, "CMC packing in functional endoscopic sinus surgery : does it affect patient comfort?", Rhinology, 47(1), pp.36~40 (2009)
- Kastl KG, "Effect of carboxymethylcellulose nasal packing on wound healing after functional endoscopic sinus surgery", Am J Rhinol Allergy, 23(1), pp.80~84 (2009)
- Wormald PJ, "A prospective single-blind randomized controlled study of use of hyaluronic acid nasal packs in patients after endoscopic sinus surgery", Am J Rhinol, 20(1), pp.7~10 (2006)
