본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재후보

Natural History of Treated New-Onset Epilepsy in Children: A Long-term Follow-up Cohort Study in a Single Center

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류신경과학

초록

Purpose: Seizure outcomes are more complicated in terms of repeated remission and relapse in the course of epilepsy. We aim to investigate the different patterns of evolution in newonset pediatric epilepsy and the seizure outcome of different types of epilepsy syndromes. Methods: We examined the evolution pattern of remission and relapse in the course of epilepsy in 326 children who were less than 15 years of age, with new-onset epilepsy. Different remission-relapse patterns were determined in each patient and according to epilepsy syndromes. The probability of repeated remission and relapse were analyzed with Markov process. Results: During follow-up (mean±SD: 79±25 months) of 326 patients, early remission, defined as remission within the first year of treatment, was seen in 288 patients (88.4%), and late remission was achieved in 21 patients (6.4%). 17 patients (5.2%) never achieved remission. 94.8% of the cohort experienced at least one remission, with first relapse, second relapse, and third relapse occurring in 115 patients (35.3%), 61 patients (18.7%), and 28 patients (8.6%), respectively. At the end of follow-up period, 281 patients (86.2%) were in terminal remission. 194 patients (59.6%) showed a continuous remitting course, and 87 patients (26.7 %) showed a remitting-relapse course. 45 patients (13.8%), including worsening courses in 28 patients (8.6%) and drug resistant courses in 17 patients (5.2%), did not show terminal remission. Markov process disclosed that children with epileptic encephalopathy and symptomatic partial epilepsy were less likely to show remission than children with idiopathic partial or generalized epilepsy (P <0.001). Conclusion: Only 13.8% of children with new-onset epilepsy have poor seizure outcome in terms of never achieving remission or persistent seizure after achieving at least one remission.The etiology of epilepsy syndrome is an important factor determining seizure outcome.

Abstract

Purpose: Seizure outcomes are more complicated in terms of repeated remission and relapse in the course of epilepsy. We aim to investigate the different patterns of evolution in newonset pediatric epilepsy and the seizure outcome of different types of epilepsy syndromes. Methods: We examined the evolution pattern of remission and relapse in the course of epilepsy in 326 children who were less than 15 years of age, with new-onset epilepsy. Different remission-relapse patterns were determined in each patient and according to epilepsy syndromes. The probability of repeated remission and relapse were analyzed with Markov process. Results: During follow-up (mean±SD: 79±25 months) of 326 patients, early remission, defined as remission within the first year of treatment, was seen in 288 patients (88.4%), and late remission was achieved in 21 patients (6.4%). 17 patients (5.2%) never achieved remission. 94.8% of the cohort experienced at least one remission, with first relapse, second relapse, and third relapse occurring in 115 patients (35.3%), 61 patients (18.7%), and 28 patients (8.6%), respectively. At the end of follow-up period, 281 patients (86.2%) were in terminal remission. 194 patients (59.6%) showed a continuous remitting course, and 87 patients (26.7 %) showed a remitting-relapse course. 45 patients (13.8%), including worsening courses in 28 patients (8.6%) and drug resistant courses in 17 patients (5.2%), did not show terminal remission. Markov process disclosed that children with epileptic encephalopathy and symptomatic partial epilepsy were less likely to show remission than children with idiopathic partial or generalized epilepsy (P <0.001). Conclusion: Only 13.8% of children with new-onset epilepsy have poor seizure outcome in terms of never achieving remission or persistent seizure after achieving at least one remission.The etiology of epilepsy syndrome is an important factor determining seizure outcome.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. Forsgren L, "The Treatment of Epilepsy", pp.21~31 (2009), Wiley-Balckwell
  2. Annegers JF, "Remission of seizures and relapse in patients with epilepsy", Epilepsia, 20, pp.729~737 (1979)
  3. Camfield C, "Does the number of seizures before treatment influence ease of control or remission of childhood epilepsy? Not if the number is 10 or less", Neurology, 46, pp.41~44 (1996)
  4. Kwan P, "Early identification of refractory epilepsy", N Engl J Med, 342, pp.314~319 (2000)
  5. Cockerell OC, "Remission of epilepsy: results from the National General Practice Study of Epilepsy", Lancet, 367, pp.1087~1100 (2006)
  6. Berg AT, "How long does it take for partial epilepsy to become intractable?", Neurology, 60, pp.186~190 (2003)
  7. Goodridge DM, "Epileptic seizures in a population of 6000. II: Treatment and prognosis", Br Med J (Clin Res Ed), 287, pp.645~647 (1983)
  8. Sillanpää M, "Natural history of treated childhood-onset epilepsy: prospective, long-term population-based study", Brain, 129, pp.617~624 (2006)
  9. Wheless JW, "Treatment of pediatric epilepsy: European expert opinion, 2007", Epileptic Disord, 9, pp.353~412 (2007)
  10. Commission on Classification and Terminology of the International League Against Epilepsy, "Proposal for revised clinical and electroencephalographic classification of epileptic seizures", Epilepsia, 22, pp.489~501 (1981)
  11. Commission on Classification and Terminology of the International League Against Epilepsy, "Proposal for revised classification of epilepsies and epileptic syndromes", Epilepsia, 30, pp.389~399 (1989)
  12. Commission on Epidemiology and Prognosis, "Guidelines for epidemiologic studies on epilepsy", Epilepsia, 34, pp.592~596 (1993)
  13. Engel J Jr, "A proposed diagnostic scheme for people with epileptic seizures and with epilepsy: report of the ILAE Task Force on Classification and Terminology", Epilepsia, 42, pp.796~803 (2001)
  14. Annegers JF, "Remission of seizures and relapse in patients with epilepsy", Epilepsia, 20, pp.729~737 (1979)
  15. Camfield P, "Childhood epilepsy: what is the evidence for what we think and what we do?", Child Neurol, 18, pp.272~287 (2003)
  16. Ma MS, "Effectiveness of the first antiepileptic drug in the treatment of pediatric epilepsy", Pedatr Neurol, 41, pp.22~26 (2009)
  17. Camfield PR, "If a first antiepileptic drug fails to control a child’s epilepsy, what are the chances of success with the next drug?", J Pediatr, 131, pp.821~824 (1997)
  18. Luciano AL, "Results of treatment changes in patients with apparently drug-resistant chronic epilepsy", Ann Neurol, 62, pp.375~381 (2007)
  19. Berg AT, "Modeling remission and relapse in pediatric epilepsy: application of a Markov process", Epilepsy Res, 60, pp.31~40 (2004)
  20. Berg AT, "Predictors of intractable epilepsy in childhood:a case-control study", Epilepsia, 37, pp.24~30 (1996)
  21. Bertol V, "Prognostic value of data from clinical, EEG and neuroimaging assessment in epilepsy with complex partial seizures", Rev Neurol, 24, pp.964~968 (1996)
  22. Ko TS, "EEG and clinical predictors of medically intractable childhood epilepsy", Clin Neurophysiol, 110, pp.1245~1251 (1999)
  23. Trinka E, "Chronic epilepsy with complex partial seizures is not always medically intractable-a long-term observational study", Acta Neurol Scand, 103, pp.219~225 (2001)
  24. Sillanpää M, "Early seizure and aetiology predict long-term medical outcome in childhood-onset epilepsy", Brain, 132, pp.989~998 (2009)
  25. Berg AT, "Complete remission in nonsyndromic childhood-onset epilepsy", Ann Neurol, 70, pp.566~573 (2011)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)