본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

English Floating Quantifiers as Intensifiers

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

This paper attempts to provide a new perspective on floating quantifiers, which have been studied almost exclusively from a syntactic point of view. This paper proposes that floating quantifiers should be analyzed as pragmatic intensifiers that can occur in different positions in a clause. In other words, floating quantifiers are comparable to emphatic reflexives that induce a contrastive focus on the interpretation of a definite DP. Evidence in favor of this claim comes from the fact that floating quantifiers share a number of idiosyncratic properties with emphatic reflexives, which cannot be accounted for by positing syntactic movement or by treating floating quantifiers as adverbials. In addition, the positions of emphatic reflexives and floating quantifiers are affected by a pragmatically significant prosodic factor. The paper also suggests that floating quantifiers are partitives, claiming that quantifier-floating is not due to a lexical property of a given quantifier.

Abstract

This paper attempts to provide a new perspective on floating quantifiers, which have been studied almost exclusively from a syntactic point of view. This paper proposes that floating quantifiers should be analyzed as pragmatic intensifiers that can occur in different positions in a clause. In other words, floating quantifiers are comparable to emphatic reflexives that induce a contrastive focus on the interpretation of a definite DP. Evidence in favor of this claim comes from the fact that floating quantifiers share a number of idiosyncratic properties with emphatic reflexives, which cannot be accounted for by positing syntactic movement or by treating floating quantifiers as adverbials. In addition, the positions of emphatic reflexives and floating quantifiers are affected by a pragmatically significant prosodic factor. The paper also suggests that floating quantifiers are partitives, claiming that quantifier-floating is not due to a lexical property of a given quantifier.

참고문헌 (26)

  1. Ahn, B. T., "The prosody of emphatic reflexives in English", Paper presented at Experimental and Theoretical Advances in Prosody (2008), Cornell University
  2. Baltin, M. R., "Floating quantifiers, PRO and predication", Linguistics Inquiry, 26, pp.199~248 (1995)
  3. Bellert, I., "On semantic and distributional properties of sentential adverbs", Linguistic Inquiry, 8, pp.337~351 (1977)
  4. Benmamoun, E., "The syntax of quantifiers and quantifier float", Linguistic Inquiry, 30, pp.621~642 (1999)
  5. Bošković, Ž., "Be careful where you float your quantifiers", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 22, pp.681~742 (2004)
  6. Brisson, C., "Distributivity, maximality, and floating quantifiers", 박사, pp.1998
  7. Chomsky, N., "Barriers" (1986), MIT Press
  8. Doetjes, J., "Rightward floating quantifiers float to the left", The Linguistic Review, 9, pp.313~332 (1992)
  9. Doetjes, J., "Adverbs and quantification", Lingua, 117, pp.685~720 (2007)
  10. Dowty, D., "The semantics of “floated” quantifiers in a transformationless grammar", Proceedings of West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 3, pp.75~90 (1984)
  11. Ernst, T., "The scopal basis of adverb licensing" (1998), Rutgers University
  12. Fitzpatrick, J., "The syntactic and semantic roots for floating quantification", 박사, pp.2006
  13. Gast, V., "Rethinking the relationship between self-intensifiers and reflexives", Linguistics, 44(2), pp.343~381 (2006)
  14. Hoeksema, J., "Partitives", pp.57~106 (1996), Mouton de Gruyter
  15. Jackendoff, R., "Semantic interpretation in generative grammar" (1972), MIT Press
  16. Jackendoff, R., "On the constituent structure of all three of the men", Linguistic Inquiry, 12, pp.150~151 (1981)
  17. Ko, H., "Syntactic edges and linearization", 박사, pp.2005
  18. 고희정, "A Hybrid Approach to Floating Quantifiers: Some Experimental Evidence", 언어연구, 29(1), pp.69~106 (2012), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
  19. König, E., "Locally free self-forms, logophoricity, and intensification in English", English Language and Linguistics, 4(2), pp.183~204 (2000)
  20. Pierrehumbert, J., "Intentions in Communication", pp.271~311 (1990), MIT Press
  21. Pollock, J.-Y., "Verb Movement, Universal Grammar, and the Structure of IP", Linguistic Inquiry, 20, pp.365~424 (1989)
  22. Postal, P., "On Raising: One rule of English grammar and its theoretical implications" (1974), MIT Press
  23. Rochman, L., "The role of intonation in floating quantifiers", Proceedings of ConSOLE XIII, pp.313~330 (2005)
  24. Shlonsky, U., "Quantifiers as functional heads: A study of quantifier float in Hebrew", Lingua, 84, pp.159~180 (1991)
  25. Siemund, P., "Intensifiers in English and German: A Comparison" (2000), Routledge
  26. Sportiche, D., "A theory of floating quantifiers and its corollaries for constituent structure", Linguistics Inquiry, 19, pp.426~449 (1988)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (23건)