본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Having a Look at English Light Verb Constructions

2

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

The purpose of the present study is to explore English LVCs and account for their usage environment within the framework of neo-Gricean pragmatics. More specifically, we will provide the answers to the following three questions: (i) how do LVCs differ from their corresponding SVCs in interpretation? (ii) what contributes to the semantic properties of LVCs? and (iii) does the choice of light verbs affect semantic characteristics of the whole constructions? And then we will argue that the distribution of LVCs and SVCs is expected and explained by utilizing Levinson's principles of pragmatic inferences, especially the M-principle which operates in terms of alternates that contrast in form. What the M-principle predicts is that “prolix or marked expressions will tend to pick up the complement of the stereotypical extensions that would have been suggested by the use of the corresponding unmarked forms”(Levinson 2000:38). When it comes to English light verbs, what is said by the use of LVCs is that colloquialness / casualness of the construction is intended, and / or that its aspectual / durative properties are present.

Abstract

The purpose of the present study is to explore English LVCs and account for their usage environment within the framework of neo-Gricean pragmatics. More specifically, we will provide the answers to the following three questions: (i) how do LVCs differ from their corresponding SVCs in interpretation? (ii) what contributes to the semantic properties of LVCs? and (iii) does the choice of light verbs affect semantic characteristics of the whole constructions? And then we will argue that the distribution of LVCs and SVCs is expected and explained by utilizing Levinson's principles of pragmatic inferences, especially the M-principle which operates in terms of alternates that contrast in form. What the M-principle predicts is that “prolix or marked expressions will tend to pick up the complement of the stereotypical extensions that would have been suggested by the use of the corresponding unmarked forms”(Levinson 2000:38). When it comes to English light verbs, what is said by the use of LVCs is that colloquialness / casualness of the construction is intended, and / or that its aspectual / durative properties are present.

참고문헌 (26)

  1. Atlas, J., "It-clefts, informativeness, and logical form", pp.1~61 (1981), Academic Press
  2. "Light Verb Jungle"[URL]
  3. Capone, A., "Review of Levinson's ‘Presumptive Meanings", Language, 77(3), pp.578~580 (2001)
  4. Chen, H. J., "Cross-Cultural Comparison of English and Chinese Metapragmatics in Refusal" (1996), Diss. Indiana U
  5. Dixon, R. M. W., "A New Approach to English Grammar, on Semantic Principles" (1991), Oxford UP
  6. Fazly, A., "Automatic Acquisition of Lexical Knowledge About Multiword Predicates" (2007), Diss. U of Toronto
  7. Fazly, A., "Automatically Determining Allowable Combinations of a Class of Flexible Multiword Expressions", pp.81~92 (2006), CICLing
  8. Grice, P., "Logic and Conversation in : Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts", pp.41~58 (1975), Academic P
  9. Horn, L., "Implicature in : The Handbook of Pragmatics", pp.3~28 (2004), Blackwell
  10. Huang, Y., "A neo-Gricean pragmatic theory of anaphora", Journal of Linguistics, 27, pp.301~335 (1991)
  11. Huang, Y., "Anaphora: A Cross-linguistic Study" (2000), Oxford Studies in Typology and Linguistic Theory
  12. Jersperson, O., "A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles" (1954), George Allen and Unwin
  13. Kearns, K., "Light Verbs in English", 석사, pp.2002
  14. Kim, S., "A Pragmatic Alternative to Syntactic Accounts of Anaphora", Discourse and Cognition, 10(3), pp.75~108 (2003)
  15. Lee, S., "Metapragmatics of Speech and Its Interactions with Pragmatic Inferences", Discourse and Cognition, 14(2), pp.117~136 (2007)
  16. Levinson, S., "Pragmatics and the Grammar of Anaphora: a partial pragmatic reduction of binding and control phenomena", Journal of Linguistics, 23, pp.379~434 (1987)
  17. Levinson, S., "Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature" (2000), MIT P
  18. "Semantic Combinatorial Processes in Argument Structure: Evidence from Light-Verbs"[URL]
  19. Quirk, R., "A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language" (1985), Longman
  20. Stevenson, S., "Statistical Measures of the Semi-Productivity of Light Verb Construction", Proceedings of the ACL 2004 Workshop on Multiword Expressions: Integrating Processing (2004)
  21. Tan, Y, M. Kan, "Extending corpus-based identification of light verb constructions using a supervised learning framework" (2006)
  22. Traugott, E. C., "A Historical Overview of Complex Predicates in : Collocational and Idiomatic Aspects of Composite Predicates in the History of English", pp.239~260 (1999), John Benjamins
  23. Wierzbicka, A., "Why Can You Have a Drink When You Can't *Have an Eat?", Language, 58, pp.753~799 (1982)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)