Holmes’s Failure of Observing in “A Scandal in Bohemia”
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper aims to offer a different reading of Arthur Conan Doyle’s “A Scandal in Bohemia” by employing labyrinth and maze metaphors to suggest a reason for Holmes failure to apprehend Irene Adler. Whereas the labyrinth has only one right pathway to identity, the maze has various pathways. This difference between the labyrinth and the maze helps us understand why Holmes is outwitted by Alder at the end of the story. Holmes, who sees London as a labyrinth, firmly believes that there is only one way to view Adler’s identity: a submissive and passive Victorian woman. However, Alder, unlike Holmes, regards London as a maze so she maintains various identities: American woman, retired opera singer, single woman, married woman, young man, and a human-animal hybrid. Adler’s multiple identities connote that she cannot simply be defined as a single type of woman, and it is this freedom that allows her to escape capture. Thus, Holmes loses the case against Adler because of his labyrinthine view, while Adler succeeds because she can observe London, and by extension the world, properly.
Abstract
This paper aims to offer a different reading of Arthur Conan Doyle’s “A Scandal in Bohemia” by employing labyrinth and maze metaphors to suggest a reason for Holmes failure to apprehend Irene Adler. Whereas the labyrinth has only one right pathway to identity, the maze has various pathways. This difference between the labyrinth and the maze helps us understand why Holmes is outwitted by Alder at the end of the story. Holmes, who sees London as a labyrinth, firmly believes that there is only one way to view Adler’s identity: a submissive and passive Victorian woman. However, Alder, unlike Holmes, regards London as a maze so she maintains various identities: American woman, retired opera singer, single woman, married woman, young man, and a human-animal hybrid. Adler’s multiple identities connote that she cannot simply be defined as a single type of woman, and it is this freedom that allows her to escape capture. Thus, Holmes loses the case against Adler because of his labyrinthine view, while Adler succeeds because she can observe London, and by extension the world, properly.
참고문헌 (13)
- Crompton, Constance, "Dissimulation and the Detecting Eye: Female Masculinity in ‘A Scandal in Bohemia", Nineteenth-Century Gender Studies, 7(3), pp.1~16 (2011)
- Doyle, Arthur Conan, "The Complete Sherlock Holmes" (2002), Gramercy
- Doyle, Arthur Conan, "The Complete Sherlock Holmes" (2002), Gramercy
- Doyle, Arthur Conan, "The Complete Sherlock Holmes" (2002), Gramercy
- Dylan, Phillips, "The Real Scandal in Bohemia: Homosexuality, Victorian England, and Sherlock Holmes", Baker Street Journal, 64(2), pp.34~42 (2014)
- Favor, Lesli J, "The Foreign and the Female in Arthur Conan Doyle: Beneath the Candy Coating", English Literature in Transition, 1880-1920, 43(4), pp.398~409 (2000)
- Fleischhack, Maria, "Disguise is Key: Germans in the Canon", Baker Street Journal, 64(3), pp.21~26 (2014)
- Goldsmith, Hilary A, "Darwin and the detective: aspects of the Darwinian worldview and the Sherlock Holmes stories of Arthur Conan Doyle", Clues, 28(2), pp.19~28 (2010)
- Jann, Rosemary, "Sherlock Holmes Codes the Social Body", ELH, 57(3), pp.685~708 (1990)
- Kestner, Joseph A, "Sherlock’s Men: Masculinity, Connan Doyle, and Cultural History" (1997), Ashgate
- Krumm, Pascale, "A Scandal in Bohemia’ and Sherlock Holmes’s Ultimate Mystery Solved", English Literature in Transition, 1880-1920, 39(2), pp.193~203 (1996)
- Saler, Michael, "Clap If You Believe in Sherlock Holmes’: Mass Culture and the Re-Enchantment of Modernity, c.1890-c.1940", The Historical Journal, 46(3), pp.599~622 (2003)
- Speelman, Tom, "The Beautiful Irene Adler of Changing Memory", Baker Street Journal, 64(2), pp.20~25 (2014)