The Sign of Four and Victorian Urban Spectatorship
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper aims to elucidate The Sign of Four as a text of urban spectatorship, placing it in the continuum of the nineteenth-century literature of urban exploration and considering the ways in which it reproduces, sustains and consolidates the key features of this particular literary genre. In tandem with the dominant rhetoric of contemporary urban writing, The Sign of Four envisages the modern city as ruptured, illegible, and thus potentially threatening, displaying a desire to regulate the seemingly uncontrollable forces of the city. The desire is embodied by the character of Holmes, an urban explorer, who, like his literary predecessors, surveys the city from a privileged standpoint. He navigates the urban space, venturing into ‘outcast London’ and getting a firm grasp of the workings of the city through the eye of power. In doing so, he emulates the urban investigators who adopted the language of imperialism to map out their own cities, envisioning the slums or working class quarters of the imperial metropolis as a dark continent within, mysterious, inaccessible, and tainted with foreignness. His gaze of authority, in essence, signifies the agency and controlling power he exerts. Therefore, this bourgeois male spectator with stable selfhood, in the final analysis, personifies the very mechanism and operation of the institutional power intent on social policing. This particular mode of urban spectatorship or a visual mastery over the city constitutes a defining feature of the social vision of The Sign of Four; and in this respect, the text essentially reiterates the nineteenth- century preoccupation with the ordering of urban life. A rereading of the novel from an angle of urban studies thus adds a further dimension to this classic detective piece, suggesting the extent to which its worldview fits into the paradigm of the nineteenth-century social ideal.
Abstract
This paper aims to elucidate The Sign of Four as a text of urban spectatorship, placing it in the continuum of the nineteenth-century literature of urban exploration and considering the ways in which it reproduces, sustains and consolidates the key features of this particular literary genre. In tandem with the dominant rhetoric of contemporary urban writing, The Sign of Four envisages the modern city as ruptured, illegible, and thus potentially threatening, displaying a desire to regulate the seemingly uncontrollable forces of the city. The desire is embodied by the character of Holmes, an urban explorer, who, like his literary predecessors, surveys the city from a privileged standpoint. He navigates the urban space, venturing into ‘outcast London’ and getting a firm grasp of the workings of the city through the eye of power. In doing so, he emulates the urban investigators who adopted the language of imperialism to map out their own cities, envisioning the slums or working class quarters of the imperial metropolis as a dark continent within, mysterious, inaccessible, and tainted with foreignness. His gaze of authority, in essence, signifies the agency and controlling power he exerts. Therefore, this bourgeois male spectator with stable selfhood, in the final analysis, personifies the very mechanism and operation of the institutional power intent on social policing. This particular mode of urban spectatorship or a visual mastery over the city constitutes a defining feature of the social vision of The Sign of Four; and in this respect, the text essentially reiterates the nineteenth- century preoccupation with the ordering of urban life. A rereading of the novel from an angle of urban studies thus adds a further dimension to this classic detective piece, suggesting the extent to which its worldview fits into the paradigm of the nineteenth-century social ideal.
참고문헌 (18)
- 김준오, "한국 문학과 정신분석?수용사적 검토와 그 전망", 현대시 사상, (겨울), pp.79~92 (1989), 고려원
- 도정일, "무의식과 욕망·프로이트와 라깡의 경우", 문화 과학, 3(봄), pp.97~119 (1993), 문화 과학사
- 박찬부, "프로이트와 라깡의 정신분석학", 성곡 논총, 22, pp.1709~44 (1991)
- Archard,David, "Consciousness and the Unconscious" (1984), Open Court
- Derrida, Jacques, "The Post Card: From Socrates to Freud and Beyond" (1987), Chicago UP
- Eagleton,Terry, "Literary Theory:An Introduction" (1983), U of Minnesota P
- Felman, Shoshana, "To Open the Question. Literature and Psychoanalysis: The Ques-tion of Reading: Otherwise", pp.5~10 (1982), Johns Hopkins UP
- Freud, Sigmund, "The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud. 24 Vols" (1958), Hogarth P
- Derrida, "Saving the Text:Literature", pp.Johns Hopkins UP, Philosophy
- Holland,Norman N, "The Dynamics of Literary Response" (1968), W.W.Norton
- Holland,Norman N, "Poems in Persons" (1973), W.W.Norton
- Jakobson, Roman, "Language in Literature" (1987), Harvard UP
- Johnson,Barbara, "The Critical Difference:Essay in Contemporary Rhetoric of Reading" (1980), Johns Hopkins UP
- Lacan, Jacques, "Seminar on ‘The Purloined Letter’", Yale French Studies, (48), pp.34~72 (1972)
- Lacan, Jacques, "Ecrits: A Selection" (1977), W. W. Norton
- Lacan, Jacques, "The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis" (1977), W.W.Norton
- Laplanche, Jean, "The Unconscious: a psychoanalytic study", Yale French Studies, (48), pp.118~75 (1972)
- Trilling, Lionel, "Freud and Literature. Freud: A Collection of Critical Essays", pp.95~111 (1981), Prentice-Hall
