본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Exploring the Differential Effects of Input-based, Output-based, and Input-to-output-based Instruction on L2 Literature Classes

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

The present paper described a quasi-experimental study aimed at investigating the effects of different instructional approaches on the reading comprehension of Chinese EFL learners in a literature class. Specifically, the study examined the impact of input-based instruction using textual enhancement (TE), output-based instruction using dictogloss (DC), and input-to-output-based instruction using literature circles (LC). A total of 92 participants who enrolled in a literature course took part in this study and they were randomly assigned to the three groups (TE, DC, LC). During the study, the participants underwent three comprehension tests at distinct time intervals: a pretest, a post-test, and a delayed post-test. The data analysis indicated a notable disparity in instructional effectiveness among the three approaches when it came to enhancing L2 learners' reading comprehension. Particularly, the post-test and delayed post-test scores for the literature circle method displayed a significant improvement compared to the other instructional methods. These findings underscored the importance of incorporating literature circle practice into reading classes and offered practical implications for educators and curriculum designers.

Abstract

The present paper described a quasi-experimental study aimed at investigating the effects of different instructional approaches on the reading comprehension of Chinese EFL learners in a literature class. Specifically, the study examined the impact of input-based instruction using textual enhancement (TE), output-based instruction using dictogloss (DC), and input-to-output-based instruction using literature circles (LC). A total of 92 participants who enrolled in a literature course took part in this study and they were randomly assigned to the three groups (TE, DC, LC). During the study, the participants underwent three comprehension tests at distinct time intervals: a pretest, a post-test, and a delayed post-test. The data analysis indicated a notable disparity in instructional effectiveness among the three approaches when it came to enhancing L2 learners' reading comprehension. Particularly, the post-test and delayed post-test scores for the literature circle method displayed a significant improvement compared to the other instructional methods. These findings underscored the importance of incorporating literature circle practice into reading classes and offered practical implications for educators and curriculum designers.

참고문헌 (48)

  1. Bayonas, M. G, "Textual enhancement and the acquisition of the Spanish present subjunctive form", EPiC Series in Language and Linguistics, 2, pp.14~22 (2017)
  2. Benati, A, "The effects of processing instruction, traditional instruction and meaning-output instruction on the acquisition of the English past simple tense", Language Teaching Research, 9(1), pp.67~93 (2005)
  3. Benati, A., "Delivering processing instruction in classroom and virtual contexts" (2007), Equinox Publishing Ltd
  4. Cameron, S., "Engaging fluent readers using literature circles", Literacy Learning : The Middle Years, 20(1) (2012)
  5. Clarke, L. W., "Help! What is wrong with these literature circles and how can we fix them?", The Reading Teacher, 61(1), pp.20~29 (2007)
  6. Combs, C. H., "What cognitive processes are triggered by input enhancement", Studies in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, 4(3), pp.1~14 (2004)
  7. Elhess, M., "Literature circles as support for language development", English Teaching Forum, 53(3), pp.13~21 (2015)
  8. Ellis, R., "SLA research and language teaching" (1997), Oxford University Press
  9. Ellis, R., "Language teaching research and pedagogy" (2012), Wiley- Blackwell
  10. Farley, A, "Authentic processing instruction and the Spanish subjunctive", Hispania, 84(2), pp.289~299 (2001)
  11. Gass, S, "Integrating research areas : A framework for second language studies", Applied Linguistics, 9, pp.198~217 (1988)
  12. Golshan, M., "Bridging corrective feedback research and second language pedagogy", Zenith-International Journal of Business Economics Management Research, 2(4), pp.120~127 (2012)
  13. Han Z., "Textual enhancement of input : Issues and possibilities", Applied Linguistics, 29, pp.1~22 (2008)
  14. Harmer, J., "The practice of English language teaching" (2001), Longman
  15. Hişmanoğlu, M, "Teaching English through literature", Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 1(1), pp.53~66 (2005)
  16. Irawati, D, "Effectiveness of literature circle on students’ reading comprehension", Indonesian Journal of Language Teaching and Linguistics, 1(3), pp.179~192 (2016)
  17. Izumi, S, "Output, input enhancement, and the noticing hypothesis : An experimental study on ESL relativization", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(4), pp.541~577 (2002)
  18. Izumi, S., "Testing the output hypothesis : Effects of output on noticing and second language acquisition", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(3), pp.421~452 (1999)
  19. Jahan, A., "The impact of textual enhancement on EFL learners’ grammatical awareness of future plans and intentions", International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 25, pp.46~66 (2015)
  20. Jacobs, G., "Combining dictogloss and cooperative learning to promote language learning", The Reading Matrix, 3(1), pp.1~15 (2003)
  21. Johnson, R. K., "The second language curriculum" (1989), Cambridge University Press
  22. Johnson, R, "The authority of the student evaluation questionnaire", Teaching in Higher Education, 5(4), pp.419~434 (2000)
  23. Khatib, M., "Enhancing reading comprehension through short stories in Iranian EFL learners", Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(2), pp.240~246 (2012)
  24. Kim, M, "Literature discussions in adult L2 learning", Language and Education, 18(2), pp.145~166 (2004)
  25. Kowal, M., "Immersion education: International perspectives", pp.284~310 (1997), Cambridge University Press
  26. Krashen, S., "Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition" (1982), Prentice Hall
  27. Leow, R., "The roles of textual enhancement and type of linguistic item in adult L2 learners’ comprehension and intake", Applied Language Learning, 13(2), pp.1~16 (2003)
  28. Long, M. H, "Modeling and assessing second language development", pp.77~99 (1985), Multilingual Matters
  29. McCall, A. L, "Teaching powerful social studies ideas through literature circles", The Social Studies, 101(4), pp.152~159 (2010)
  30. Park, E. S., "Textual enhancement of two L2 Arabic forms : A classroom-based study", Language Awareness, 23(4), pp.334~352 (2014)
  31. Pearson, C, "Acting up or acting out? Unlocking children’s talk in literature circles", Literacy, 44(1), pp.3~11 (2010)
  32. Rogers, W., "Literature circles: Tools and techniques to inspire reading groups" (2002), Portage & Main Press
  33. Schmidt, R, "The role of consciousness in second language learning", Applied Linguistics, 11, pp.129~158 (1990)
  34. Schmidt, R, "Deconstructing consciousness in search of useful definitions for applied linguistics", Consciousness in Second Language Learning, 11, pp.237~326 (1993)
  35. Schmidt, R., "Attention and awareness in foreign language teaching and learning", pp.1~64 (1995), University of Hawai'i at Manoa
  36. Schmidt, R., "Cognition and second language instruction", pp.3~32 (2001), Cambridge University Press
  37. Skehan, P., "A cognitive approach to language learning" (1998), Oxford University Press
  38. Simard, D, "Differential effects of textual enhancement formats on intake", System, 37(1), pp.124~135 (2009)
  39. Swain, M., "Principles and practice in applied linguistics:Studies in honor of H. Widdowson", pp.125~144 (1995), Oxford University Press
  40. Swain, M, "The output hypothesis and beyond : Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue", Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning, 97(1), pp.97~114 (2000)
  41. Swain M., "Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate : A step towards second language learning", Applied Linguistics, 16, pp.371~391 (1995)
  42. Thomas, D. M., "Impact of literature circles in the developmental college classroom", Journal of College Reading and Learning, 49(2), pp.89~114 (2019)
  43. VanPatten, B, "Input processing and grammar instruction in second language acquisition" (1996), Greenwood Publishing Group
  44. Varita, D, "Improving reading comprehension through literature circles", English Education Journal, 8(2), pp.234~244 (2017)
  45. Wajnryb, R., "Grammar dictation(Vol. 3)" (1990), Oxford University Press
  46. Wen, Q. F, "Ouput-driven, Input-enabled hypothesis : A tentative theory of foreign language classroom instruction for university students", Foreign Language Education in China, 2, pp.1~12 (2014)
  47. Zhang, S, "The role of input, interaction and output in the development of oral fluency", English Language Teaching, 2(4), pp.91~100 (2009)
  48. Zhao P, "Reappraisal of the roles of input and output in EFL teaching", Shandong Foreign Language Teaching Journal, 2004(5), pp.68~70 (2004)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)