본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Icare Rebound Tonometer와 Goldmann 압평 안압계의 비교

Comparison of Icare Rebound Tonometer with Goldmann Applanation Tonometry

2

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류안과학

초록

목적: Icare Rebound Tonometer (IRT)와 Goldmann 압평 안압계(GAT)로 측정한 안압을 비교하여 두 안압계로 측정한 안압 사이의상관 관계 및 임상적인 유용성에 대해 알아보고자 하였다. 대상과 방법: 녹내장 및 녹내장 의증 환자 131명을 대상으로 IRT와 GAT를 이용하여 측정된 안압을 비교하고 굴절 이상 및 중심각막두께가 미치는 영향을 분석하였다. 결과: IRT로 측정한 안압과 GAT로 측정한 안압 사이에는 뚜렷한 양의 상관관계를 보였으며 GAT로 측정한 안압이 IRT로 측정한 안압에비해 평균 2.23 ± 3.16 mmHg 높았다. 중심각막두께가 두꺼울수록 GAT로 측정한 안압은 높게 측정되었으며 IRT를 이용하여 측정시에도 역시 높게 측정되었다. GAT로 안압 측정시 구면대응치 -5 디옵터 이상의 근시안에서 나머지 안에 비해 +1.50 ± 0.68 mmHg 낮게 측정되었고, IRT로 측정시에도 +1.88 ± 0.75 mmHg 낮게 측정되었다. 결론: IRT는 GAT와 높은 상관관계를 보였으나 2 mmHg 정도 낮게 측정되었고 중심각막두께가 얇을수록, 근시 도수가 높을수록 낮게측정될 수 있음을 고려해야 할 것으로 생각한다.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare Icare rebound tonometer (IRT) and Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) and investigate the clinical usefulness of IRT. Methods: In a retrospective study of 131 eyes with glaucoma and glaucoma suspect, intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured with IRT and GAT. The correlation between IRT and GAT and the influence of refractive error (spherical equivalent;SE) and central corneal thickness (CCT) were analyzed. Results: A distinct correlation between IRT and GAT was found. IOP measured with GAT was 2.23 ± 3.16 mm Hg higher than with IRT (p < 0.001). As CCT increased, IOP was measured higher with both GAT and IRT. IOP in myopic eyes (SE ≥ -5 diopter) was measured relatively lower than in hyperopic eyes (SE < -5 diopter) with GAT (+1.50 ± 0.68 mm Hg) and IRT (+1.88 ± 0.75 mm Hg). Conclusions: IRT showed strong correlation with GAT, but IOP measured approximately 2 mm Hg lower. The IOP tends to measure lower at low CCT and in myopic eyes.

참고문헌 (26)

  1. Salvetat ML, "Comparison of iCare tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry in normal corneas and in eyes with automated lamellar and penetrating keratoplasty", Eye (Lond), 25, pp.642~650 (2011)
  2. Kageyama M, "Comparison of ICare rebound tonometer with noncontact tonometer in healthy children", J Glaucoma, 20, pp.63~66 (2011)
  3. Diaz A, "Accuracy of the ICare rebound tonometer in glaucomatous eyes with topical ocular hypotensive medication", Ophthalmic Physiol Opt, 28, pp.29~34 (2008)
  4. Leiva M, "Comparison of the rebound tonometer (ICare) to the applanation tonometer (Tonopen XL) in normotensive dogs", Vet Ophthalmol, 9, pp.17~21 (2006)
  5. Pakrou N, "Clinical comparison of the Icare tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry", J Glaucoma, 17, pp.43~47 (2008)
  6. Sahin A, "Reproducibility and tolerability of the ICare rebound tonometer in school children", J Glaucoma, 16, pp.185~188 (2007)
  7. García-Resúa C, "Accuracy of the new ICare rebound tonometer vs. other portable tonometers in healthy eyes", Optom Vis Sci, 83, pp.102~107 (2006)
  8. 이주은, "Comparison Between Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry", Korean Journal of Ophthalmology, 23(1), pp.27~31 (2009), 대한안과학회
  9. 염호엽, "포스펜 안압계의 임상 적용 : 정상인에서 골드만 압평안압계와의 비교", 대한안과학회지, 46(4), pp.676~681 (2005), 대한안과학회
  10. Song MC, "Clinical comparision of the ProTon and the Goldmann applanation tonometer", J Korean Ophthalmol Soc, 36, pp.2188~2194 (1995)
  11. Yim HB, "Clinical comparision of the pulsair pneumotonometer, oculab tono-pen and Goldmann applanation tonometer", J Korean Ophthalmol Soc, 32, pp.364~370 (1991)
  12. Krzyzanowska-Berkowska P, "Clinical evaluation of the ICare tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure", Klin Oczna, 112(7-9), pp.217~220 (2010)
  13. Scuderi GL, "Validity and limits of the rebound tonometer (ICare®): clinical study", Eur J Ophthalmol, 21, pp.251~257 (2011)
  14. Muttuvelu DV, "Precision and accuracy of the ICare tonometer - Peripheral and central IOP measurements by rebound tonometry", Acta Ophthalmol, 90, pp.322~326 (2012)
  15. Jorge J, "Comparison of the IOPen and iCare rebound tonometers with the Goldmann tonometer in a normal population", Ophthalmic Physiol Opt, 30, pp.108~112 (2010)
  16. Poostchi A, "The iCare rebound tonometer: comparisons with Goldmann tonometry, and influence of central corneal thickness", Clin Experiment Ophthalmol, 37, pp.687~691 (2009)
  17. Ruokonen PC, "Evaluation of the impedance tonometers TGDc-01 and iCare according to the international ocular tonometer standards ISO 8612", Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 245, pp.1259~1265 (2007)
  18. Detry-Morel M, "Clinical evaluation of the dynamic rebound tonometer Icare", J Fr Ophtalmol, 29, pp.1119~1127 (2006)
  19. Fernandes P, "Comparison of the ICare rebound tonometer with the Goldmann tonometer in a normal population", Ophthalmic Physiol Opt, 25, pp.436~440 (2005)
  20. Vandewalle E, "Comparison of ICare, dynamic contour tonometer, and ocular response analyzer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma", Eur J Ophthalmol, 19, pp.783~789 (2009)
  21. Abraham LM, "Comparison of the ICare rebound tonometer with the Goldmann applanation tonometer by experienced and inexperienced tonometrists", Eye (Lond), 22, pp.503~506 (2008)
  22. Brusini P, "Comparison of ICare tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients", J Glaucoma, 15, pp.213~217 (2006)
  23. Doughty MJ, "Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and meta-analysis approach", Surv Ophthalmol, 44, pp.367~408 (2000)
  24. Munkwitz S, "Comparison of the iCare rebound tonometer and the Goldmann applanation tonometer over a wide IOP range", Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 246, pp.875~879 (2008)
  25. Kotecha A, "Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer", Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 47, pp.5337~5347 (2006)
  26. Tranchina L, "Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure differences between an Air-Puff Tonometer and the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer", J Glaucoma (2012)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (29건)