Effect and Safety of Pressure Sensor-equipped Handpiece in Phacoemulsification System
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: To evaluate the effect of the Active Sentry handpiece of the Centurion Vision System compared to the Centurion Ozil handpiece for phacoemulsification in cataract surgery. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 281 patients (449 eyes) who underwent cataract surgery between August 2020 and June 2021. Preoperative measurements, intraoperative parameters, complication rate, and postoperative outcomes were compared between the Active Sentry handpiece and the Centurion Ozil handpiece groups. Additionally, the parameters were compared in different cataract severity groups and multiple predictive factors for the number of active surge mitigation (ASM) actuations were assessed with the Active Sentry handpiece. Results: There were 198 eyes in the Active Sentry group and 251 eyes in the Centurion Ozil group. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups, as the cumulative dissipated energy in the Active Sentry and Centurion Ozil groups were 8.32 ± 7.74 and 7.87 ± 9.25 μJ, respectively (p = 0.576). Total surgery time, ultrasound usage time, aspiration time, amount of fluid aspirated, postoperative corrected distant visual acuity, and postoperative decrease in corneal endothelial cell density were comparable between the two groups. The significant contributors to the number of ASM actuations were age, preoperative corrected distant visual acuity, axial length, and total ultrasound time. Conclusions: There was no clear advantage of the Active Sentry handpiece compared to the Centurion Ozil handpiece. ASM actuation increases with age, poor visual acuity before surgery, short axial length, and prolonged ultrasound usage time. It is expected that in more severe and high-risk cataract surgery, the Active Sentry handpiece functions more effectively, possibly affecting the safety and prognosis.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the effect of the Active Sentry handpiece of the Centurion Vision System compared to the Centurion Ozil handpiece for phacoemulsification in cataract surgery. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 281 patients (449 eyes) who underwent cataract surgery between August 2020 and June 2021. Preoperative measurements, intraoperative parameters, complication rate, and postoperative outcomes were compared between the Active Sentry handpiece and the Centurion Ozil handpiece groups. Additionally, the parameters were compared in different cataract severity groups and multiple predictive factors for the number of active surge mitigation (ASM) actuations were assessed with the Active Sentry handpiece. Results: There were 198 eyes in the Active Sentry group and 251 eyes in the Centurion Ozil group. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups, as the cumulative dissipated energy in the Active Sentry and Centurion Ozil groups were 8.32 ± 7.74 and 7.87 ± 9.25 μJ, respectively (p = 0.576). Total surgery time, ultrasound usage time, aspiration time, amount of fluid aspirated, postoperative corrected distant visual acuity, and postoperative decrease in corneal endothelial cell density were comparable between the two groups. The significant contributors to the number of ASM actuations were age, preoperative corrected distant visual acuity, axial length, and total ultrasound time. Conclusions: There was no clear advantage of the Active Sentry handpiece compared to the Centurion Ozil handpiece. ASM actuation increases with age, poor visual acuity before surgery, short axial length, and prolonged ultrasound usage time. It is expected that in more severe and high-risk cataract surgery, the Active Sentry handpiece functions more effectively, possibly affecting the safety and prognosis.
참고문헌 (14)
- Obstbaum SA, "Effective cataract surgery : an undervalued procedure", J Cataract Refract Surg, 24, pp.1417~ (1998)
- Mamalis N, "Phacoemulsification technology update", J Cataract Refract Surg, 42, pp.651~652 (2016)
- Nicoli CM, "Experimental anterior chamber maintenance in active versus passive phacoemulsification fluidics systems", J Cataract Refract Surg, 42, pp.157~162 (2016)
- Solomon K D, "Clinical study using a new phacoemulsification system with surgical intraocular pressure control", J Cataract Refract Surg, 42, pp.542~549 (2016)
- Sharif-Kashani P, "Comparison of occlusion break responses and vacuum rise times of phacoemulsification systems", BMC Ophthalmol, 14, pp.96~ (2014)
- Thorne A, "Phacoemulsifier occlusion break surge volume reduction", J Cataract Refract Surg, 44, pp.1491~1496 (2018)
- Aravena C, "Aqueous volume loss associated with occlusion break surge in phacoemulsifiers from 4 different manufacturers", J Cataract Refract Surg, 44, pp.884~888 (2018)
- Gonzalez-Salinas R, "Comparison of cumulative dissipated energy delivered by active-fluidic pressure control phacoemulsification system versus gravity-fluidics", Int Ophthalmol, 38, pp.1907~1913 (2018)
- Miller KM, "Experimental study of occlusion break surge volume in 3 different phacoemulsification systems", J Cataract Refract Surg, 47, pp.1466~1472 (2021)
- Vasavada V, "Real-time dynamic changes in intraocular pressure after occlusion break : comparing 2 phacoemulsification systems", J Cataract Refract Surg, 47, pp.1205~1209 (2021)
- Suzuki H, "Effect of a new phacoemulsification and aspiration handpiece on anterior chamber stability", J Cataract Refract Surg, 49, pp.91~96 (2023)
- Jiraskova N, "Our experience with Active Sentry and Centurion Ozil handpieces", Cesk Slov Oftalmol, 77, pp.18~21 (2021)
- Cyril D, "Comparison of two phacoemulsification system handpieces : prospective randomized comparative study", J Cataract Refract Surg, 48, pp.328~333 (2022)
- Faria-Correia F, "Correlations of objective metrics for quantifying dysfunctional lens syndrome with visual acuity and phacodynamics", J Refract Surg, 33, pp.79~83 (2017)