커먼로 국가의 기업살인죄의 검토 - 기업 고유의 형사책임 인정을 위한 기업문화론적 접근방법 -
Corporate Manslaughter in common law jurisdiction
0
조회
0
다운로드
24
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
A Corporation is a creature of law and run by people who act as its agent. Corporations have rights and obligations in their own name. But they can commit crimes? Commonwealth jurisdictions have traditionally approached corporate criminal responsibility using “vicarious liability” or “identification principle” that locates its criminal liability derivatively through the culpability of individual actors. But since the 1990s, some countries like UK, Australia have enacted legislation which makes corporations criminally liable on the basis of management failure. This article begins with a discussion of the limitation of the common law doctrine and a general review of the nature of organizational fault, and then provides a critical analysis of how corporate criminal liability is conceptualized in the UK, Australia and Canada. The author argues that the strategy of Individualism in the criminal law fails to capture the significance of the corporate operation, because the traditional concept of individual wrongdoing presupposes personal quantities such as the capacity to choose freely which cannot be effectively applied to the corporate body. It is suggested that the corporate culture model in the Australian “Criminal Code Act 1995” might be a promising alternative.
Abstract
A Corporation is a creature of law and run by people who act as its agent. Corporations have rights and obligations in their own name. But they can commit crimes? Commonwealth jurisdictions have traditionally approached corporate criminal responsibility using “vicarious liability” or “identification principle” that locates its criminal liability derivatively through the culpability of individual actors. But since the 1990s, some countries like UK, Australia have enacted legislation which makes corporations criminally liable on the basis of management failure. This article begins with a discussion of the limitation of the common law doctrine and a general review of the nature of organizational fault, and then provides a critical analysis of how corporate criminal liability is conceptualized in the UK, Australia and Canada. The author argues that the strategy of Individualism in the criminal law fails to capture the significance of the corporate operation, because the traditional concept of individual wrongdoing presupposes personal quantities such as the capacity to choose freely which cannot be effectively applied to the corporate body. It is suggested that the corporate culture model in the Australian “Criminal Code Act 1995” might be a promising alternative.
참고문헌 (24)
- 강동범, "경제범죄와 그에 대한 형법적 대응", 형사정책, (7) (1995)
- 김재봉, "기업에 대한 보호관찰의 도입가능성 검토", 비교형사법연구, 8(2), pp.805~820 (2006), 한국비교형사법학회
- 김재봉, "양벌규정과 기업처벌의 근거", 법학논총, 24(3), pp.31~48 (2007), 법학연구소
- 김호기, "전통적 책임주의에 대한 현대적 도전 - 특정 성범죄자에 대한 위치추적 전자장치 부착제도 도입이 가지는 의미 -", 형사법연구, 21(1), pp.199~222 (2009), 한국형사법학회
- 박미숙, "법인범죄 제재의 정책적 근거 및 제재 다양화방안", 형사정책연구, 20(1), pp.759~783 (2009), 한국형사정책연구원
- 배종대, "형법총론(제9개정판)" (2008)
- 이기헌, "기업의 형사책임에 관한 비교법적 연구" (1996), 형사정책연구원
- 이승현, "기업범죄에 대한 효율적 형사제재방안", 형사정책연구, 20(1), pp.785~806 (2009), 한국형사정책연구원
- 임석원, "법인의 범죄능력인정을 위한 새로운 해석의 필요성", 형사정책연구, 18(3), pp.79~106 (2007), 한국형사정책연구원
- 조국, "법인의 형사책임과 양벌규정의 법적 성격", 서울대학교 법학, 48(3), pp.60~76 (2007), 법학연구소
- 조병선, "양벌규정의 구조와 행위자의 특정. in: 형법 개정 및 양벌규정 개선 공청회 자료집" (2008)
- 조병선, "형법에서의 행위자의 특정: 개인책임과 단체책임*", 서울대학교 법학, 50(2), pp.591~614 (2009), 법학연구소
- Alice Belcher, "Imagining How a Company Thinks: What Is Corporate Culture?", Deakin Law Review, 11 (2006)
- Andrew Ashworth, "Principles of Criminal Law", ~ (2009)
- Brent Fisse, "The Allocation of Responsibility for Corporate Crime: Individualism, Collectivism And Accountability", Sydney Law Review, 11 (1988)
- David Ormerod, "Smith and Hogan Criminal Law" (2008)
- David Ormerod, "Legislative Comment: The Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007", Criminal Law. Review (2008)
- Eli Lederman, "Models for imposing corporate criminal liability: from adaptation and imitation toward aggregation and the search for self-identity", Buffalo Criminal Law Review, 4 (2000)
- James Gobert, "The Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 - Thirteen years in the making but was it worth the wait?", Modern Law Review (2008)
- John C. Coffee, Jr., "'No Soul to Damn: No Body to Kick': An Unscandalized Inquiry into the Problem of Corporate Punishment", Michigan Law Review, 79 (1981)
- Jonathan Clough, "Bridging the Theoretical Gap: The Search for a Realist Model of Corporate Criminal Liability", Criminal Law Forum, 18 (2007)
- Michael Jefferson, "Corporate Criminal Liability in th 1990s", The Journal of Criminal Law, 64 (2000)
- Steven Bittle, "From Manslaughter to Preventable Accident: Shaping Corporate Criminal Liability", Law & Policy, 28 (2006)
- Vincent Todarello, "Corporations Don't Kill People - People Do: Exploring the Goals of the United Kingdom's Corporate Homicide Bill", New York Law School Law Review, 46 (2002)