형법 제10조 제2항에 대한 비판적 고찰-비교법적 고찰을 통한 현행 제도에 대한 분석과 입법안의 검토 및 제안을 중심으로 -
The Critical Review on the Clause 2, the Article 10 of the Criminal Law -Focusing on the analysis for the present scheme through the comparative legal study, the review and the proposal of legislation bill-
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The theory of interpretation(de lege lata) and the theory of legislation(de lege fe-renda) for the Clause 2, the Article 10 of current Criminal Law mitigating thepunishment have been checked in case the responsibility is weak in this study. The development situation of the theory of interpretation in Germany and the p-recedent are analyzed, the diminished capacity scheme of USA similar to the li-mit of responsibility according to the mental and physical weakness is checkedand the diminished responsibility scheme of England is investigated prior to thi-s consideration. It reaches the recognition necessitating the flexible responsible m-itigation through this investigation. The concept of mental and physical disorder has been checked and the cause of mental and physical weakness has been Inv-estigated based on this understanding. The Supreme Court is not including the personality disorder, etc., in the mental disorder by adhering to the previous po-sition still even though there has been the change in the classification of mental disorder in the neuropsychiatry world. However, the personality disorder, the I-mpulse control disorder, the antisocial personality disorder all should be classifi-ed into the mental and physical disorder, the mental and physical weakness or not should be distinguished by judging if it is in the excited state at times of a-ction through the psychological analysis in case of action of passion. The judgm-ent of appraiser and the judgment of judge should be close, the concrete diagno-sis and the valuation creteria should be prepared by the reasonable method incl-uding the judgment standard for this and the judgment standard for the time of crime. The revised tentative plan has been investigated and the legislation bill h-as been presented based on this discussion. The mental and physical disorder in the current regulation is necessary to be classified into the mental disorder, the psychological disorder, the physical disorder; ‘the action owing to the damage o-f legal capacity at time of action has been caused’ should be clearly stated in t-he legislation bill. The mandatory mitigation and the discretionary mitigation are compromised for the flexible mitigation and the harmony of responsibility princi-ples, it may be reasonable for the discrimination to be placed based on the suit-ability or not. Even though there should be the legislative modification, the pre-paration of detailed criterion based on the medical diagnosis is urgent to evalua-te the mental and physical weakness reasonably; more concreted development of discussion shall have to be continued for the mental and physical weakness inthe future based on this alignment.
Abstract
The theory of interpretation(de lege lata) and the theory of legislation(de lege fe-renda) for the Clause 2, the Article 10 of current Criminal Law mitigating thepunishment have been checked in case the responsibility is weak in this study. The development situation of the theory of interpretation in Germany and the p-recedent are analyzed, the diminished capacity scheme of USA similar to the li-mit of responsibility according to the mental and physical weakness is checkedand the diminished responsibility scheme of England is investigated prior to thi-s consideration. It reaches the recognition necessitating the flexible responsible m-itigation through this investigation. The concept of mental and physical disorder has been checked and the cause of mental and physical weakness has been Inv-estigated based on this understanding. The Supreme Court is not including the personality disorder, etc., in the mental disorder by adhering to the previous po-sition still even though there has been the change in the classification of mental disorder in the neuropsychiatry world. However, the personality disorder, the I-mpulse control disorder, the antisocial personality disorder all should be classifi-ed into the mental and physical disorder, the mental and physical weakness or not should be distinguished by judging if it is in the excited state at times of a-ction through the psychological analysis in case of action of passion. The judgm-ent of appraiser and the judgment of judge should be close, the concrete diagno-sis and the valuation creteria should be prepared by the reasonable method incl-uding the judgment standard for this and the judgment standard for the time of crime. The revised tentative plan has been investigated and the legislation bill h-as been presented based on this discussion. The mental and physical disorder in the current regulation is necessary to be classified into the mental disorder, the psychological disorder, the physical disorder; ‘the action owing to the damage o-f legal capacity at time of action has been caused’ should be clearly stated in t-he legislation bill. The mandatory mitigation and the discretionary mitigation are compromised for the flexible mitigation and the harmony of responsibility princi-ples, it may be reasonable for the discrimination to be placed based on the suit-ability or not. Even though there should be the legislative modification, the pre-paration of detailed criterion based on the medical diagnosis is urgent to evalua-te the mental and physical weakness reasonably; more concreted development of discussion shall have to be continued for the mental and physical weakness inthe future based on this alignment.
참고문헌 (56)
- 대한신경정신의학회, "신경정신의학" (2013), 중앙문화사
- 박광배, "법심리학" (2010), 학지사
- 심신장애 판정의 문제점과 개선방안-각국의 제도 및 현황을 비교하여, "신동일", 형사정책연구원, ~ (2004)
- 이수정, "최신 범죄심리학" (2013), 학지사
- 김정환, "성폭력범죄에서 책임능력", 법학논총, 23(1), pp.155~181 (2010), 법학연구소
- 박정성, "현행법상 심신장애의 판단기준에 관한 논의", 법과정책, 18(1), pp.119~144 (2012), 법과정책연구원
- 성경숙, "형사책임능력의 판단기준에 관한 고찰 - 미국의 정신이상항변을 중심으로 -", 성균관법학, 22(3), pp.197~226 (2010), 법학연구소
- 손지영, "청소년 게임중독의 뇌신경과학적 진단과 형사책임능력* - 중독 범죄소년의 치료적 규제 제도 필요성을 중심으로 -", 제도와 경제, 6(2), pp.227~248 (2012), 한국제도∙경제학회
- 신관우, "충동조절장애의 책임능력 판단기준", 한국범죄심리연구, 6(3)통권 : 12, pp.89~114 (2010), 한국범죄심리학회
- 이경숙, "형사정신감정의 변화 - 1990년과 2000년", 대한법의학회지, 26(2) (2002)
- 이인영, "뇌영상 증거의 과학적 증거로서의 기능과 한계", 형사법연구, 22(4)통권 : 45, pp.255~278 (2010), 한국형사법학회
- 이인영, "책임능력에 대한 판단과 정신감정절차", 홍익법학, 11(2), pp.157~190 (2010), 법학연구소
- 이진국, "형사절차상 정신장애에 대한 감정", 법학논총, 28(4), pp.351~364 (2011), 법학연구소
- 한상훈, "책임 분야 개정방안", 형사법연구, 21(1), pp.79~114 (2009), 한국형사법학회
- Alexander Larry, "Crime and Cupability: A Theory of Criminal Law" (2011)
- Dix E. George, "Criminal Law" (2010), Thomson․West
- Fravell H. John, "인지발달" (2007), 시그마플러스
- Gropp Walter, "Strafrecht: Allgemeiner Teil" (2005), Springer
- Herring Jonathan, "Criminal Law: Text, Cases, and Materials" (2010)
- Jakobs Günther, "Strafrecht Allgemeiner Teil" (1991), Walten de Gruyter
- Jescheck Heinrich Hans, "Lehrbuch des Strafrechts Allgemeiner Teil" (1982), Duncker & Humblot
- LaFave R. Wayne, "Criminal Law" (2010), West
- Moore Michael, "Placing Blame : A General Theory of the Criminal Law" (2010)
- Roxin Claus, "Strafrecht Allgermeiner Teil" (2006), C. H. Beck
- Schneider Frank, "Begutachtung psychischer Störungen" (2010), Springer
- Schönke Adolf, "Strafgesetzbuch Kommentar" (2010), C. H. Beck
- Singer G. Richard, "Criminal Law" (2010), Wolters Kluwer
- Stratenwerth Günter, "Strafrecht Allgemeiner Teil" (2010), Vahlen
- Colb F. Sherry, "Evil or Ill? Justifying the Insanity Defense by Lawrie Reznek", Stanford Law Review, 52(1) (1999)
- Denend Van Jessica, "Crime: Self and Society: Psychoanalytical Perspectives on Taking Responsibility and Moving Forward", Journal of Religion and Health, 46(1) (2007)
- Fennell Phil, "The Criminal Procedure (Insanity and Unfitness to Plead) Act 1991", The Modern Law Review, 55(4) (1992)
- Fingarette Herbert, "Addiction and Criminal Responsibility", The Yale Law Journal, 84(3) (1975)
- Finkel J. Norman, "How Jurors Construe Insanity", Law and Human Behavior, 13(1) (1989)
- Gendin Sydney, "Insanity and Criminal Responsibility", American philosophical Quarterly, 10(2) (1973)
- Horney Julie, "Menstrual Cycles and Criminal Responsibility", Law and Human. Behavior, 2(1) (1978)
- Kröber Ludwig Hans, "Kriterien verminderter Schuldfähigkeit nach Alkoholkonsum", NStZ (1996)
- Loughnan Arlie, "Manifest Madness’: Towards a New Understanding of Insanity Defence", The Modern Law Review, 70(3) (2007)
- Morse J. Stephen, "Retaining a Modified Insanity Defense", Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 477 (1985)
- Ogloff R. P. James, "A Comparison of Insanity Defense Standards on Juror Decision Making", Law and Human Behavior, 15(5) (1991)
- Pfister Wolfgang, "Die Beurteilung der Schuldfähigkeit in der Rechtsprechung des Bundesgerichtshofs", NStZ-RR (2013)
- Pluiseh Frank, "Neuere Tendenzen der BGH-Rechtsprechung bei der Beurteilung der erheblich verminderten Schuldfähigkeit gemäß §21 StGB nach Medikamenteneinnahme", NZV (1996)
- Rauch J. H., "Nochmals: Gutachterliche Kompetenz bei der Klärung der Schuldfähigkeit oder: Den Streit zwischen Psychiatrie und Psycholgie", NStZ (1984)
- Roberts F. Caton, "The Social Construction of Criminal Responsibility and Insanity", Law and Human Behavior, 15(4) (1991)
- Roberts F. Caton, "Implicit Theories of Criminal Responsibility", Law and Human Behavior, 11(3) (1987)
- Schilling Uwe, "Begutachtung von strafrechtlicher Verantwortlichkeit und Schuldfähigkeit aus der Sicht eines Jugendpsychologen", NStZ (1997)
- Schreiber Ludwig Hans, "Bedeutung und Auswirkungen der neu gefaβten Bestimmungen über die Schuldfähigkeit", NStZ (1981)
- Silver Eric, "Demythologizing Inaccurate Perceptions of the Insanity Defense", Law and Human Behavior, 18(1) (1994)
- Skeem L. Jennifer, "Venirepersons's Attitudes Toward the Insanity Defense: Developing, Defining, and Validating a Scale", Law and Human Behavior, 28(6) (2004)
- Tolmie Julia, "Alcoholism and Criminal Liability", The Modern Law Review, 64(5) (2001)
- Theune Werner, "Auswirkungen der Drogenabhängigkeit auf die Schuldfähigkeit und die Zumessung von Strafe und Maßregeln", NStZ (1997)
- Theune Werner, "Auswirkung des normal psychologischen(psychogenen) Affektes auf die Schuldfähigkeit sowie den Schuld–und Rechtsfolgenausspruch", NStZ (1999)
- Theune Werner, "Auswirkungen einer schweren anderen seelischen Abartigkeit auf die Schuldfähigkeit und die Zumessung von Strafe und Maβregel", NStR-RR (2002)
- Theune Werner, "Die Beurteilung der Schuldfähigkeit in der Rechtsprechung des Bundesgerichtshofes-2. Teil", NStZ-RR (2003)
- Theune Werner, "Die Beurteilung der Schuldfähigkeit in der Rechtsprechung des Bundesgerichtshofes-2. Teil", NStZ-RR (2005)
- Theune Werner, "Auswirkungen der Schuldfähigkeitsbeurteilung in der Rechtsprechung des Bundesgerichtshofes", NStZ-RR (2007)