본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

수학과 교수․학습 시사점 도출을 위한 2010, 2011년 국가수준 초등학교 학업성취도 평가 문항 내용 비교 분석

Analysis of Item Contents of 2010, 2011 National Assessment of Educational Achievement at elementary school for deduction of suggestions to the mathematics teaching-learning

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

National Assessment of Educational Achievement(NAEA) is important standard reference to become the basic data for confirming the effect of the curriculum administrated and the educational policies put in force presently and preparing the new curriculum and educational policies. In this paper, we looked into the mean and standard deviation of the calibrated score of whole group and male/female students, the correct answer ratio of each performance level and the correct answer ratio of each content domain, etc. in the results of NAEA at 6th elementary school. The analytic objects are 2010 and 2011 NAEA that are changed into complete enumeration survey and the standard reference prepared on the basis of the new calibrated score is applied to. And we analysed and compared correct answer ratio of the each content domain and each item to conform the difference between male and female students. On the basis of the these informations, we investigated that here is what kind of characteristics and trends to the whole group and what kind of suggestions to the teaching-learning. And we were going to provide the information of the needs to understand which content of mathematics is needed and which thinking methods are needed.

Abstract

National Assessment of Educational Achievement(NAEA) is important standard reference to become the basic data for confirming the effect of the curriculum administrated and the educational policies put in force presently and preparing the new curriculum and educational policies. In this paper, we looked into the mean and standard deviation of the calibrated score of whole group and male/female students, the correct answer ratio of each performance level and the correct answer ratio of each content domain, etc. in the results of NAEA at 6th elementary school. The analytic objects are 2010 and 2011 NAEA that are changed into complete enumeration survey and the standard reference prepared on the basis of the new calibrated score is applied to. And we analysed and compared correct answer ratio of the each content domain and each item to conform the difference between male and female students. On the basis of the these informations, we investigated that here is what kind of characteristics and trends to the whole group and what kind of suggestions to the teaching-learning. And we were going to provide the information of the needs to understand which content of mathematics is needed and which thinking methods are needed.

참고문헌 (12)

  1. 2009년 국가수준 학업성취도 평가 연구, "권점례", 한국교육과정평가원, ~, pp.연구보고 RRE 2010-6-4 (2010)
  2. 2010년 국가수준 학업성취도 평가 출제 연구, "김미경", 한국교육과정평가원, ~, pp.연구보고 RRE 2011-3-1 (2011)
  3. 2012년 국가수준 학업성취도 평가의 출제 연구, "김미경", 한국교육과정평가원, ~ (2012)
  4. 국가수준 학업성취도 평가에 나타난 우리나라 학력 향상의 특성 분석, "김경희", 한국교육과정평가원, ~, pp.연구보고 RRE 2011-2-4 (2011)
  5. 국가수준 교육성취도 평가 방안 연구, "김명숙", 한국교육과정평가원, ~, pp.연구보고 RRE 98-8 (1998)
  6. 우리나라 초・중・고 학생의 학업성취 특성 분석 -2009년 국가수중 학업성취도 평가 전수 결과 중심-, "김성숙", 한국교육과정평가원, ~, pp.연구보고 RRE 2010-7-1 (2010)
  7. 국가경쟁력 제고를 위한 국가수준 학업성취도 평가의 발전방향, "김성열", 한국교육과정평가원, ~, pp.포지션페이퍼. ORM 2009-5-1 (2009)
  8. 국가수준 학업성취도 평가 결과 추이(2003년~2007년) -중학교 3학년-, "양길석", 한국교육과정평가원, ~, pp.연구보고 RRE-4-2 (2008)
  9. 2010년 국가수준 학업성취도 평가 결과 분석-수학-, "이봉주", 한국교육과정평가원, ~, pp.연구보고 RRE 2011-3-4 (2011)
  10. 2010년 국가수준 학업성취도 평가 출제 방안 연구, "이창훈", 한국교육과정평가원, ~, pp.연구보고 RRE 2010-6-1 (2010)
  11. 조윤동, "수학과의 문항 답지반응 특성 및 성취도 추이 연구, In 국가수준 학업성취도 평가 결과에 기반한 교과별 학력 특성", 한국교육과정평가원 세미나 자료집 (2012)
  12. 2011년 국가수준 학업성취도 평가 결과 분석 -수학-, "조윤동", 한국교육과정평가원, ~ (2012)

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)