자연수의 사칙연산에 대한 아동의 이해 분석
The Analysis of Children's Understanding of Operations on Whole Number
0
조회
0
다운로드
13
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The study has been conducted with 29 children from 4th to 6th grades to realize how they understand addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division of whole numbers, and how their understanding influences solving of one-step word problems. Children's understanding of operations was categorized into “adding” and “combination” for additions, “taking away” and “comparison” for subtractions, “equal groups,” “rectangular arrange,” “ratio,” and “Cartesian product” for multiplications, and “sharing,” “measuring,” “comparison,” “ratio,” “multiplicative inverse,” and “repeated subtraction” for divisions. Overall, additions were mostly understood additions as “adding”(86.2%), subtractions as “taking away”(86.2%), multiplications as “equal groups”(100%), and divisions as “sharing”(82.8%). This result consisted with the Fischbein’s intuitive models except for additions. Most children tended to solve the word problems based on their conceptual structure of the four arithmetic operations. Even though their conceptual structure of arithmetic operations helps to better solve problems, this tendency resulted in wrong solutions when problem situations were not related to their conceptual structure. Children in the same category of understanding for each operations showed some common features while solving the word problems. As children’s understanding of operations significantly influences their solutions to word problems, they needs to be exposed to many different problem situations of the four arithmetic operations. Furthermore, the focus of teaching needs to be the meaning of each operations rather than computational algorithm.
Abstract
The study has been conducted with 29 children from 4th to 6th grades to realize how they understand addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division of whole numbers, and how their understanding influences solving of one-step word problems. Children's understanding of operations was categorized into “adding” and “combination” for additions, “taking away” and “comparison” for subtractions, “equal groups,” “rectangular arrange,” “ratio,” and “Cartesian product” for multiplications, and “sharing,” “measuring,” “comparison,” “ratio,” “multiplicative inverse,” and “repeated subtraction” for divisions. Overall, additions were mostly understood additions as “adding”(86.2%), subtractions as “taking away”(86.2%), multiplications as “equal groups”(100%), and divisions as “sharing”(82.8%). This result consisted with the Fischbein’s intuitive models except for additions. Most children tended to solve the word problems based on their conceptual structure of the four arithmetic operations. Even though their conceptual structure of arithmetic operations helps to better solve problems, this tendency resulted in wrong solutions when problem situations were not related to their conceptual structure. Children in the same category of understanding for each operations showed some common features while solving the word problems. As children’s understanding of operations significantly influences their solutions to word problems, they needs to be exposed to many different problem situations of the four arithmetic operations. Furthermore, the focus of teaching needs to be the meaning of each operations rather than computational algorithm.
참고문헌 (35)
- 강지형, "초등수학교육" (2005), 동명사
- 김연, "학교 수학과 어린이의 수학 지식에 대한 고찰 - 초등학교 1학년 덧셈을 중심으로 -", 한국학교수학회논문집, 7(1), pp.83~102 (2004), 한국학교수학회
- 김진숙, "초등학교 수학 교과서 문장제에 대한 문제해결 관점에서의 연구", 박사, pp.1998
- 남승인, "문제 장면의 모델화를 통한 수업이 곱셈적 사고력과 곱셈 능력 신장에 미치는 영향", 한국수학교육학회지 시리즈 C <초등수학교육>, 8(1), pp.33~50 (2004)
- 노현옥, "초등학교 수학 교과서에 나오는 자연수의 사칙 연산 문장제 분석", 진주교육대학원 교과교육연구, 28, pp.1~19 (2005)
- 박현미, "자연수의 나눗셈에 관한 초등학교 학생의 비형식적 지식", 한국초등수학교육학회지, 10(2), pp.221~242 (2006), 한국초등수학교육학회
- 방정숙, "초등학교 6학년 학생들의 소수 계산 오류와 선행지식 간의 연결 관계 분석 및 지도방안 탐색", 수학교육, 45(3), pp.275~294 (2006), 한국수학교육학회
- 이종욱, "한 초등학교 2학년 아동의 곱셈과 나눗셈 해결 전략에 관한 사례 연구", 수학교육, 46(2), pp.155~171 (2007), 한국수학교육학회
- Baroody, A.J., "The effects of instruction on children's understanding of the "equals" sign", The Elementary School Journal, 84, pp.199~212 (1983)
- Behr, M., "How children view the equals sign", Mathematics Teaching, 92, pp.13~15 (1980)
- Bell, A., "Choice of operation in verbal arithmetic problems: The effects of number size, problem structure and context", Educational Studies in Mathematics, 15, pp.129~147 (1984)
- Carpenter, T.P., "Problem structure and first-grade children's initial solution processes for simple addition and subtraction problems", Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 12, pp.27~39 (1981)
- Carpenter, T.P., "The development of addition and subtraction problem-solving skills;Addition and subtraction: A cognitive perspective", pp.9~24 (1982), Lawrence Erlbaum
- Carpenter, T. P., "The effect of instruction on children's solutions of addition and subtraction word problems", Educational Studies in Mathematics, 14, pp.55~72 (1983)
- Carpenter, T.P., "The acquisition of addition and subtraction concepts in grades one through three", Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 15, pp.179~202 (1984)
- Carpenter, T.P., "Representation of addition and subtraction word problems", Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19, pp.345~357 (1988)
- Carpenter, T.P., "Models of problem solving: A study of kindergarten children's problem-solving processes", Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24, pp.428~441 (1993)
- Carpenter, T.P., "Children's mathematics cognitively guided instruction" (1999), Heinemann
- Carpenter, T.P., "Using knowledge of children's mathematics thinking in classroom teaching: An experimental study;Classics in mathematics educational research", pp.134~151 (2004), National council of teachers of mathematics
- Christou, C., "The developmental nature of ability to solve one-step word problems", Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29(4), pp.436~442 (1998)
- De Corte, E., "The effect of semantic structure on first graders' strategies for solving addition and subtraction word problems", Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 18(5), pp.363~381 (1987)
- English, L.D., "Mathematics education models and processes" (1995), Lawrence Erlbaum
- Fischbein, E., "The role of implicit models in solving verbal problems in multiplication and division", Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 16, pp.3~17 (1985)
- Fuson, K., "Research on whole number addition and subtraction;Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning", pp.243~275 (1992), Macmillan
- Goldin, G.A., "Task Variables in Mathematical Problem Solving" (1984), The Franklin Institute Press
- Greer, B., "Multiplication and division as models of situations;Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning", pp.276~295 (1992), Macmillan
- Kilpatrick, J., "dding it up : Helping children learn mathematics" (2001), National Academy Press
- Kintsch, W., "Understanding and solving word arithmetic problems", Psychological review, 92(1), pp.109~129 (1985)
- Kouba, V.L., "Children's solution strategies for equivalent set multiplication and division word problems", journal for research in mathematics education, 20(2), pp.147~158 (1989)
- Mulligan, J.T., "Young children's intuitive models of multiplication and division", Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(3), pp.309~330 (1997)
- Nesher, P., "The development of sematic categories for addition and subtraction", Educational studies in mathematics, 13, pp.373~394 (1982)
- Sherin, B., "Multiplication strategies and the appropriation of computational resources", Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36(4), pp.347~395 (2005)
- Valentin, J.D., "Roles of semantic structure of arithmetic word problems on pupils ability to identify the correct operation", International journal for mathematics teaching and learning (2004)
- van Putten, C.M., "Progressive mathematization of long division strategies in Dutch primary school", Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36(1), pp.44~73 (2005)
- Vergnaud, G., "Multiplicative structure;Number concepts and operations in the middle grades", pp.141~162 (1988), Erlbaum