원광대학교 산본치과병원에서 770명의 환자에 식립한 2158개의 골유착성 임플란트의 보철 전 초기 생존율에 관한 후향적 연구
Retrospective study on survival rate of 2158 osseointegrated implants placed in 770 patients in Sanbon dental hospital of Wonkwang University
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
목적: 이 연구의 목적은 상악 및 하악의 완전 무치악 및 부분 무치악 부위에 식립된 골유착성 임플란트의 보철 전 초기 생존율 및 생존과 관련된 요소를 평가하고 실패를 야기하는 요인에 대해 알아보는 것이다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 2004년부터 2013년까지 770명의 환자에서 총 2158개의 골내 임플란트를 식립하였다. 임플란트의 소실과 환자의 연령 및 성별, 식립 위치, 임플란트 시스템, 길이 및 직경, 그리고 골이식 방법과의 연관성을 평가하기 위해 임상적 비교를 시행하였다. 결과: 임플란트 식립 위치에 따라 상악 전치부에서 98.23%, 상악 구치부 96.97%, 하악 전치부 97.85%, 하악 구치부 98.75%의 임플란트 생존율을 보였다(P < 0.05). 임플란트의 종류 및 표면처리 기법은 임플란트 생존율과 특이성을 보이지 않았다. 임플란트 매식체의 직경에 따라 3.0 mm 이하의 임플란트에서 100%, 3.0 - 3.5 mm 97.09%, 3.5 - 4.0 mm 98.19%, 4.0 - 4.5 mm 98.29%의 생존율을 보였고, 5.0 mm 이상의 직경 가진 넓은 폭경의 임플란트에서 75%의 비교적 낮은 생존율을 보였다(P < 0.05). 임플란트 매식체의 길이에 따라 9 - 11 mm 및 11 - 13 mm의 길이를 가진 임플란트에서 각각 98.12% 및 98.17%의 높은 생존율을 보였으나 통계학적 유의성을 가지진 못하였다. 골이식술의 방법에 따라 상악동 골이식술을 단독으로 시행한 부위에서 임플란트 생존율은 89.05%, 골유도 재생술을 단독으로 시행한 경우 98.28%, 상악동 골이식술과 골유도 재생술을 동시에 시행한 경우 98.34%, 골이식술이 동반되지 않은 경우 99.28%의 생존율을 보였다(P < 0.05). 결론: 이번 연구에서 임플란트 식립 후 최종 보철물 시적 전 초기단계에서의 임플란트 생존율은 임플란트의 식립위치, 임플란트 매식체의 직경, 그리고 골이식 방법과 관련이 있었다. 이러한 결과에 따라 각각 상악 구치부, 5.0 mm 이상의 넓은 임플란트, 그리고 상악동 골이식술을 단독으로 시행한 부위에서 현저하게 낮은 생존율을 확인할 수 있었다.
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of the study was to evaluate preprosthetic initial survival rate and factors associated with survival of osseointegrated implants placed in edentulous area of maxilla and mandible and to suspect the possible causes leading to failure. Materials and Methods: A total of 2158 endosseous implants that had been inserted between 2004 through 2013 were placed in 770 patients. The clinical comparisons were performed to evaluate implant loss in relation to age and gender of patients, position, system, length and diameter of implant, and bone graft technique. Results: According to position, the survival rates were 98.23% in maxillary anterior site, 96.98% in maxillary posterior site, 97.85% in mandibular anterior site and 98.76% in mandibular posterior site (P< 0.05). According to diameter of implant, the survival rates were 100% under 3.0 mm, 97.09% between 3.0 to 3.5 mm, 98.19% between 3.5 to 4.0 mm and 98.29% between 4.0 to 4.5 mm but relatively lower survival rate was 75% in 5.0 mm-over (P < 0.05). Thesurvival rates of implants were 89.51%, 98.28%, 98.34% and 99.27% in the group with isolated sinus graft , with isolated GBR, with sinus graft and GBR simultaneously and without bone graft, especially (P < 0.05). Conclusion: This study establishes a relationship between survival rate of implant and position, diameter of implant system and bone graft technique. In conclusion, there were low survival rates in maxillary posterior site, in dental implants with wide diameter of 5 mm-over, and in the group with isolated sinus graft.
참고문헌 (47)
- Brånemark PI, "Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies", Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg, 3, pp.81~100 (1969)
- Bergman B, "Evaluation of the results of treatment with osseointegrated implants by the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare", J Prosthet Dent, 50, pp.114~115 (1983)
- Brånemark PI, "Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period", Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg, 16, pp.1~132 (1977)
- Adell R, "A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw", Int J Oral Surg, 10, pp.387~416 (1981)
- 김영석, "골유착성 치과 임플란트의 성공률에 대한 임상적 연구", Maxillofacial Plastic Reconstructive Surgery, 24(2), pp.137~147 (2002), 대한악안면성형재건외과학회
- Esposito M, "A 5-year follow-up comparative analysis of the efficacy of various osseointegrated dental implant systems: a systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 20, pp.557~568 (2005)
- 홍지연, "임플란트 식립 유형에 따른 후향적 연구", Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science, 37(4), pp.805~824 (2007), 대한치주과학회
- Albrektsson T, "Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct boneto- implant anchorage in man", Acta Orthop Scand, 52, pp.155~170 (1981)
- van Steenberghe D, "Survival and success rates with oral endosseous implants", Proceedings of the 3rd European Workshop on Periodontology, pp.242~254 (1999), Quintessence Publishing Co
- Misch CE, "Implant success, survival, and failure: the International Congress of Oral Implantologists (ICOI) Pisa Consensus Conference", Implant Dent, 17, pp.5~15 (2008)
- Zarb GA, "The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants: the Toronto study. Part III: problems and complications encountered", J Prosthet Dent, 64, pp.185~194 (1990)
- Esposito M, "Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (I). Success criteria and epidemiology", Eur J Oral Sci, 106, pp.527~551 (1998)
- Sussman HI, "Endodontic pathology leading to implant failure: a case report", J Oral Implantol, 23, pp.112~115 (1997)
- el Askary AS, "Why do dental implants fail? Part I", Implant Dent, 8, pp.173~185 (1999)
- Piattelli A, "Implant periapical lesions: clinical, histologic, and histochemical aspects. A case report", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 18, pp.181~187 (1998)
- Lioubavina-Hack N, "Significance of primary stability for osseointegration of dental implants", Clin Oral Implants Res, 17, pp.244~250 (2006)
- Schwartz-Arad D, "Failure causes, timing, and cluster behavior: an 8-year study of dental implants", Implant Dent, 17, pp.200~207 (2008)
- Goodacre CJ, "Rungcharassaeng K. Clinical complications of osseointegrated implants", J Prosthet Dent, 81, pp.537~552 (1999)
- 김성회, "임플란트의 생존율에 영향을 미치는 국소적 인자에 대한 19년간의 후향적 연구", 대한치과보철학회지, 48(01), pp.28~40 (2010), 대한치과보철학회
- Lazzara RJ, "A human histologic analysis of osseotite and machined surfaces using implants with two opposing surfaces", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 19, pp.117~129 (1999)
- Davies JE, "Mechanism of endosseous integration", Int J Posthodont, 11, pp.391~401 (1998)
- Haas R, "Survival of 1920 IMZ implants followed for up to 100 months", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 11, pp.581~588 (1996)
- Scurria MS, "Prognostic variables associated with implant failure: a retrospective effectiveness study", In J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 13, pp.400~406 (1998)
- Kim JS, "Preprosthetic stage dental implant failure", J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg, 27, pp.178~183 (2001)
- 박경아, "상하악 대구치 부위에서 넓은 직경 임플란트의 생존율에 대한 후향적 연구", Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science, 37(4), pp.825~838 (2007), 대한치주과학회
- Schwartz-Arad D, "Failure causes, timing, and cluster behavior: an 8-year study of dental implants", Implant Dent, 17, pp.200~207 (2008)
- Ivanoff CJ, "Influence of variation in implant diameters: a 3- to 5-year retrospective clinical report", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 14, pp.173~180 (1999)
- 장진화, "상?하악 대구치 부위에 식립된 임플란트의 생존율에 대한 후향적 연구", Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science, 37(2), pp.165~180 (2007), 대한치주과학회
- Friberg B, "Clinical outcome of Brånemark system implants of various diameters: a retrospective study", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 17, pp.671~677 (2002)
- Mijiritsky E, "Implant diameter and length influence on survival: interim results during the first 2 years of function of implants by a single manufacturer", Implant Dent, 22, pp.394~398 (2013)
- Langer B, "The wide fixture: a solution for special bone situations and a rescue for the compromised implant. Part 1", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 8, pp.400~408 (1993)
- Renouard F, "Impact of implant length and diameter on survival rates", Clin Oral Implants Res, 17, pp.35~51 (2006)
- Shin SW, "A retrospective study on the treatment outcome of wide-bodied implants", Int J Prosthodont, 17, pp.52~58 (2004)
- Anner R, "The clinical effectiveness of 6 mm diameter implants", J Periodontol, 76, pp.1013~1015 (2005)
- Krennmair G, "Clinical analysis of wide-diameter frialit-2 implants", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 19, pp.710~715 (2004)
- Becktor JP, "Survival analysis of endosseous implants in grafted and nongrafted edentulous maxillae", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 19, pp.107~115 (2004)
- Fugazzotto PA, "Success and failure rates of osseointegrated implants in function in regenerated bone for 72 to 133 months", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 20, pp.77~83 (2005)
- Corinaldesi G, "Evaluation of survival and success rates of dental implants placed at the time of or after alveolar ridge augmentation with an autogenous mandibular bone graft and titanium mesh: a 3- to 8-year retrospective study", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 24, pp.1119~1128 (2009)
- Mish CE, "Bone character: second vital implant criterion", Dent Today, 7, pp.39~40 (1998)
- Friberg B, "Identification of bone quality in conjunction with insertion of titanium implants. A pilot study in jaw autopsy specimens", Clin Oral Impants Res, 6, pp.213~219 (1995)
- Jensen OT, "The sinus bone graft", pp.178~181 (2006), Quintessence Publishing Co
- Toffler M, "Minimally invasive sinus floor elevation procedures for simultaneous and staged implant placement", N Y State Dent J, 70, pp.38~44 (2004)
- 김범진, "상악동 거상술을 동반한 상악구치부에 식립된 임플란트 생존율에 대한 후향적 연구", 대한구강악안면외과학회지, 36(2), pp.108~118 (2010), 대한구강악안면외과학회
- Boyne PJ, "James RA. Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous marrow and bone", J Oral Surg, 38, pp.613~616 (1980)
- Summers RB, "A new concept in maxillary implant surgery: the osteotome technique", Compendium, 15, pp.152~ (1994)
- Zitzmann NU, "Sinus elevation procedures in the resorbed posterior maxilla. Comparison of the crestal and lateral approaches", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 85, pp.8~17 (1998)
- Tong DC, "A review of survival rates for implants placed in grafted maxillary sinuses using meta-analysis", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 13, pp.175~182 (1998)
