본문 바로가기
KERD
논문

노동자 건강보호를 위한 최신 유전독성학 연구전략

Novel Genotoxic Strategies for Efficiently Detect Chemicals’ Carcinogenicity

임경택
한국환경보건학회 (Korean Society of Environmental Health)|2018.02|한국환경보건학회지 (JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES)|제44권 제1호|pp. 31-43

3

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Developmentstrategieschemicalscarcinogenicitygenotoxic

초록

Objectives: Effective genetic toxicology and molecular biology research techniques and strategies that are highly correlated with the carcinogenic inhalation toxicity test and related research are required. The aim of this study was to maximize the utilization of chemical substances to prevent workers’ occupational diseases. Methods: We surveyed the literature, domestic and international references, and the status of relevant domestic and foreign professional organizations. Expert advisory opinions were reflected, and experts were consulted by participating in domestic and overseas academic conferences. Results: The current status of domestic and international genotoxic toxicity evaluation was examined through various documents from related organizations. Cell models for in vitro lung toxicology were investigated and summarized, and the human resourcesand performance results of genetic toxicity studies and pilot projects were compared and analyzed by holding an advisory meeting. We examined domestic and international genotoxicity guidelines and investigatednew test methods for the development of genotoxicity and carcinogenicity. Ultimately, we described long-term future predictions, including the implementation of our researchers’ recommendations and occupational genetic toxicology forecasts for future worker health protection. Conclusions: This research project aims to establish current genetic toxicology and molecular biology research techniques and strategies that can maximize the linkage with the carcinogenic inhalation toxicity test and research in the future. We expanded the study of genetic toxicity and establish afoundation forgenetic toxicity in accordance with research trends in Korea and abroad.

Abstract

Objectives: Effective genetic toxicology and molecular biology research techniques and strategies that are highly correlated with the carcinogenic inhalation toxicity test and related research are required. The aim of this study was to maximize the utilization of chemical substances to prevent workers’ occupational diseases. Methods: We surveyed the literature, domestic and international references, and the status of relevant domestic and foreign professional organizations. Expert advisory opinions were reflected, and experts were consulted by participating in domestic and overseas academic conferences. Results: The current status of domestic and international genotoxic toxicity evaluation was examined through various documents from related organizations. Cell models for in vitro lung toxicology were investigated and summarized, and the human resourcesand performance results of genetic toxicity studies and pilot projects were compared and analyzed by holding an advisory meeting. We examined domestic and international genotoxicity guidelines and investigatednew test methods for the development of genotoxicity and carcinogenicity. Ultimately, we described long-term future predictions, including the implementation of our researchers’ recommendations and occupational genetic toxicology forecasts for future worker health protection. Conclusions: This research project aims to establish current genetic toxicology and molecular biology research techniques and strategies that can maximize the linkage with the carcinogenic inhalation toxicity test and research in the future. We expanded the study of genetic toxicity and establish afoundation forgenetic toxicity in accordance with research trends in Korea and abroad.

참고문헌 (33)

  1. Study on the establishment of evaluation system for genotoxicity using genotoxic biomarker genes, "Seo Y", Korea Food & Drug Administration, ~ (2007)
  2. David Kirkland, "Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens", Mutation Research, 2005, pp.584(1-2), 1~256[DOI]
  3. A study on the introduction of internationally adopted genotoxicity testing battery and guidelines for pharmaceuticals, "Sohn SJ", Korea Food & Drug Administration, ~ (2015)
  4. Development of Safety Pharmacology method using 3D cardiac tissue model with Human iPS-induced cardiomyocyte, "Seo JW", Korea Food & Drug Administration, ~ (2016)
  5. 김정곤, "OECD QSAR Application Toolbox를 이용한 화학물질의 건강유해성 및 생태독성 예측", 한국환경보건학회지, 39(2), pp.130~137 (2013), 한국환경보건학회[DOI]
  6. Study on next generation toxicological tools of molecular biomarker(s) and risk assessment to environmental hazardous chemicals, "Ryu JC", Ministry of Enviroment, ROK, ~ (2008)
  7. Sohn SJ, "Establishment and International Cooperation of Korean Center for the Validation of Alternative Methods", Journal of Alternatives to Animal Experiments, 4(2), pp.29~32 (2010)
  8. Ralph Meuwissen, "Mouse models for human lung cancer", Genes & Development, 19, pp.643~664 (2005)[DOI]
  9. WHITE PAPER OFENVIROMENT, "Ministry of Environment", 240~272 (2012)
  10. 김지영, "전자산업에서 사용하는 화학물질의 독성예측을 위한 QSAR 접근법", 한국환경보건학회지, 40(2), pp.105~113 (2014), 한국환경보건학회[DOI]
  11. OECD, "OECD series on testing and assessment Number 34, Guidance document on the validation and international acceptance of new or updated test methods for hazard assessment", ENJ, MONO 14, pp.2005, ~
  12. Environmental Protection Agency, "User's Guide for The Toxicity Estimation Software Tool" (2012), Environmental Protection Agency Press
  13. Youngyong In, "Prediction of Acute Toxicity to Fathead Minnow by Local Model Based QSAR and Global QSAR Approaches", Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society, 33(2), pp.613~619 (2012), 대한화학회
  14. Furuhama A, "Development of an ecotoxicity QSAR model for the KAshinhou Tool for Ecotoxicity( KATE) system, March 2009 version", SAR QSAR Environ Res, 21(5-6), pp.403~413 (2010)
  15. Pizzo F, "In silico models for predicting ready biodegradability under REACH: A comparative study", Sci Total Environ, 463-464, pp.161~1688 (2013)
  16. Teubner W, "Computer models versusreality: how well do in silico models currently predictthe sensitization potential of a substance", Regul Toxicol Pharmacol, 67(3), pp.468~485 (2013)[DOI]
  17. Kovarich S, "QSAR classification models for the screening of the endocrine disrupting activity of perfluorinated compounds", SAR QSAR Environ Res, 23(3-4), pp.207~220 (2012)[DOI]
  18. Freidig AP, "Development of a QSAR for worst case estimates of acute toxicity of chemically reactive compounds", Toxicol Lett, 170(3), pp.214~222 (2007)[DOI]
  19. Yang SY, "Comparison of QSAR mutagenicity prediction data with Ames test results", Environmental Mutagens & Carcinogens, 20(1), pp.21~25 (2000)
  20. Cariello NF, "Comparison of the computer programs DEREK and TOPKAT to predict bacterial mutagenicity", Mutagenesis, 17(4), pp.321~329 (2002)[DOI]
  21. Mombelli E, "An evaluation of the predictive abilityof the QSAR software packages, DEREK, HAXARDEXPERT and TOPKAT, to describe chemicallyinduced skin irritation", Altern Lab Anim, 36(1), pp.15~24 (2008)
  22. Devillers J, "Evaluation of the OECD QSAR Application Toolbox and Toxtree for estimating the mutagenicity of chemicals. Part 1. Aromatic amines", SAR QSAR Environ Res, 21(7-8), pp.753~769 (2010)[DOI]
  23. Weed DL, "Weight of Evidence: A Review of Concept and Method", Risk Anal, 25(6), pp.1545~1557 (2005)[DOI]
  24. Sturla SJ, "Systems toxicology: from basic research to risk assessment", Chem Res Toxicol, 27(3), pp.314~329 (2014)
  25. Peitsch MC, "A decade of systems biology: where are we and where are we going to?", Drug Discov Today, 19(2), pp.105~107 (2014)[DOI]
  26. Andersen ME, "Toxicity testing in the 21st century: bringing the vision to life", Toxicol Sci, 107(2), pp.324~330 (2009)
  27. 최규락, "분자영상의 적용분야 및 전망", 한국방사선학회논문지, 8(3), pp.123~136 (2014), 한국방사선학회[DOI]
  28. Choi K, "Molecular Imaging", SAGE Journals, 6, pp.75~84 (2007)
  29. Wu JC, "Molecular imaging of cardiovascular gene products", J Nucl Cardiol, 11, pp.491~505 (2004)[DOI]
  30. Howard, J, "Synthetic Biology and Occupational Risk", J Occ Env Hyg, 14(3), pp.224~236 (2017)[DOI]
  31. National Research Council of the National Academies, "Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century-A Vision and A Strategy" (2007), The National Academies Press
  32. Andersen ME, "Developing microphysiological systems for use as regulatory toolschallenges and opportunities", ALTEX, 31(3), pp.364~367 (2014)[DOI]
  33. Umar A, "Future directions in cancer prevention", Nat Rev Cancer, 12(12), pp.835~848 (2012)

관련 논문AI추천

만성발암성 흡입독성시험 우선순위 물질 선정 연구허용, 김현영, 김형아, 윤진하, 임경택, 임철홍, 차신우한국환경보건학회 · 한국환경보건학회지2017 · 제43권 제1호형질전환 설치류의 체세포와 생식세포를 이용한 유전변이시험 평가박철범, 손동원, 안효진, 정미숙한국동물실험대체법학회 · 한국동물실험대체법학회지2023 · 제17권 제1호전자산업에서 사용하는 화학물질의 독성예측을 위한 QSAR 접근법김관식, 김동일, 김지영, 최광민한국환경보건학회 · 한국환경보건학회지2014 · 제40권 제2호에틸렌옥사이드(Ethylene oxide)에 노출된 병원 근로자들의 소핵 빈도와 유전적 감수성 지표와의 연관성김원, 김성균, 김양지, 신미연, 윤충식, 이선영, 이영현, 이중원, 정해원, 최영주한국환경보건학회 · 한국환경보건학회지2011 · 제37권 제6호진보된 세포분열억제 소핵 평가법을 활용한 체외 유전독성검사 및 3 차원 핵 이미지 분석김혜지, 박순현, 서인철, 심휘수, 이채은, 이현수, 장원석한국동물실험대체법학회 · 한국동물실험대체법학회지2018 · 제12권 제1호실험실 근무자의 화학물질 노출과 건강 위험박정임, 변혜정한국환경보건학회 · 한국환경보건학회지2010 · 제36권 제6호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)

광주지역 미세먼지의 화학적 조성이 시정에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구신은상, 정선아, 임철수, 조미라, 김정수, 이상보pp. 1-142006~2015년 동안 국내 유해화학물질 배출량 변화에 관한 연구임지영, 김현지, 김민선, 이지호, 이상목, 이청수pp. 15-23치과용 아말감에서 유리된 수은이 수질에 미치는 영향고재완, 사공준pp. 24-30화학사고 시 수용체 보호를 위한 독성끝점 농도와 급성독성 자료를 활용한 우려농도 예측값 조사김순신, 양원호, 김정곤, 이지윤, 지경희, 윤준헌, 류지성pp. 44-54치과기공소 주조체 산세척과정에서 발생하는 폐수내 중금속 농도사공준, 정다이pp. 55-62
원문 보기