先秦儒家의 墨家 批判

Abstract

Confucianism and Mohism are the most significant Scholars of pre-China dynasty, and this report is focused on the critic of Mohism from the Mencius and Xunzi, the descendents of Confucius. Their critics are centered on the "Common Love Theory(兼愛論)" in the Ten Theory of Mohism at the last. Xunzi's critics are ranged Thrift in Utilisation(節用)?Thrift in Funerals(節葬)?Rejection of Music(非樂) from Common Love Theory. On the other hand, Mencius was focused only "Common Love Theory". In my point of view, Mencius accepted the aspect of Mohism as a self-examination and Xunzi rejected whole logics of the Mohism. For Example, Mencius related Heaven and Natural Virtue for God and the Law, which is the result of God, but Xunzi emphasized remodeling of nature in the result of Separation Theory, which is separate Nature and Human. That is, Mencius accented Li(禮) in the veins of Heaven and wanted to get the power of practice, but the result was the lost of the real justice. But Xunzi was representative of Confucianism, that is ranked together with Mohism, because his thought of LiYue(禮樂) was based on social necessity. And This is the fundamental derivation of influential difference in the middle and last period of civil war ages.