테니스 경기분석을 위한 주요 분석인자의 일관성 탐색
Identification of consistency on Key Performance Indicators for Tennis match analysis
0
조회
0
다운로드
11
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
본 연구는 테니스 경기 공식기록을 통하여 승패의 차이를 분석할 때 사용되는 분석인자들에 대한 일관성을 알아내고자 하였다. 특히, 본 연구에서는 하나의 대회가 아닌 10개의 테니스 대회에서 나타나는 ‘승자’와 ‘패자’간의 차이를 경기기록과 세트기록으로 구분하여 비교해보고, 이에 대한 차이를 논함으로써 분석인자의 탐색에 대한 일관성에 대해 살펴보고자 하였다. 본 연구를 위하여 2005년부터 2010년까지의 4대 그랜드슬램 테니스 대회의 자료(경기기록(n=687), 세트기록(n=391))가 대상이 되었으며, ‘승자’와 ‘패자’간 차이를 비교한 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 대회별로 나누지 않고 전체자료를 대상으로 비교한 결과에서는 경기기록의 경우 11개의 분석인자에서 모두 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 나타낸 반면, 세트기록에서는 브레이크 포인트 승리율을 제외한 10개의 분석인자에서 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 나타냈다(p<.05). 둘째, 경기기록을 대회별로 살펴본 결과, 6개의 분석인자에서 공통적으로 통계적 차이(p<.05)를 보였다. 셋째, 세트기록을 대회별로 살펴본 결과, 3개의 분석인자에서 공통적으로 통계적 차이(p<.05)를 보였다. 따라서 각 대회의 특성과 선수의 경기력 차이와 같은 변인을 고려하지 않고 자료의 범위에 따라서 분석인자를 탐색할 때의 일관성이 나타났으며, 향후 실시간분석에 적용할 수 있을 것으로 사료된다.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the differences of identification of performance indicators which were distinguishing the winning and losing performances in Tennis Gland Slam competitions. Especially, the consistencies of identification on Performance Indicators through statistical comparisons using Wilcoxon Signed Ranks tests were considered. For this study, 687 matches and 391 sets were selected as subjects in 4 Grand Slam tennis competitions (from 2005 to 2010). Totally, 11 performance indicators were selected from the official stats of 4 Grand Slam tennis championships as independent variables for this study that they were % of successful serves, aces, double faults, unforced errors, % of successful 1st serve, % of successful 2nd serve, winners, received points, break points conversions, % of net approaches and total point obtained. As results of the study, there were 3 summarized findings as following below;Firstly, there were significant differences of all 11 performance indicators between winning and losing where the data were arranged as match results (p<.05). Likely, there were also significant differences of 10 performance indicators between winning and losing where the set data were used for comparisons (p<.05). Only 1 performance indicator was shown differently between match and set data that it was ‘Break point conversions’. Secondly, there were significant differences on 6 performance indicators distinguishing winning and losing where matches’ data were used in the comparisons of championships separately (p<.05). The performance indicators were % of successful 1st serve, % of successful 2nd serve, winners, received points, break points conversions and total point obtained. Thirdly, there were significant differences on only 3 performance indicators distinguishing winning and losing where sets’ data were used in the comparisons of championships separately (p<.05). The performance indicators were % of successful 1st serve, received points and total point obtained. Consequently, further researches are required that the development of the systematic structures of identification for KPI and real-time analysis systems as well.
참고문헌 (23)
- 권중호, "테니스 경기력 향상을 위한 경기경향분석 연구-'98 방콕 아시안 게임 경기내용을 중심으로", 한국여성체육학회지, 13(2), pp.5~16 (1999)
- 김주학, "스포츠기록분석시스템의 발전과 전망-Notational Analysis를 중심으로", 한국스포츠기록분석학회지, 2(1), pp.47~63 (2004)
- 김혜진, "테니스 경기의 득점 및 실점상황에 의한 승패결정 경기내용분석", 한국체육측정평가학회지, 8(2), pp.43~57 (2006), 한국체육측정평가학회
- 안지훈, "세계 여자 프로테니스 경기 내용 분석", 한국 스포츠 리서치, 16(4), pp.225~232 (2005), 한국스포츠리서치
- 이기봉, "국내 남자 테니스 단식 경기의 승패 요인과 득점 과정 분석", 한국체육학회지, 43(3), pp.903~912 (2004), 한국체육학회
- 최형준, "The Methods for identification of valid performance indicators of sport within real-time analysis systems", 한국체육측정평가학회지, 10(3), pp.41~49 (2008), 한국체육측정평가학회
- 최형준, "테니스 그랜드슬램 대회의 선수 수준별 경기력 비교", 한국체육학회지, 49(3), pp.385~393 (2010), 한국체육학회
- 최형준, "배드민턴 혼합복식의 승⋅패 및 랠리 상황별 경기분석", 한국체육측정평가학회지, 12(3), pp.103~113 (2010), 한국체육측정평가학회
- Choi,H, "Definitions of Performance Indicators in Real-time and Lapsed-time analysis in Performance Analysis of Sports", 석사, pp.2008
- Choi, H. J., "A Study of team performance indicators by separated time scale using a real-time analysis techniques within English national basketball league", the World Congress of Performance Analysis of Sport VII, pp.124~127 (2006)
- Choi, H., "The identifiaction of optimal sets of performance indicators for real-time analysis using Principle Components Analysis in sports", the World Congress of Performance Analysis of Sport VIII, pp.295~301 (2008)
- Choi, H., "A comparison of whole match and individual set data in order to identify valid performance indicators for real-time feedback in men’s single tennis matches, in Science and racket sports IV", pp.227~231 (2008), Routledge
- Choi, H., "The valid numbers of performance indicators for real-time analysis using prediction models within men singles in 2005 Wimbledon Tennis Championship", the World Congress of Performance Analysis of Sport VII, pp.207~213 (2006)
- Franks, I. M, "A systematic approach to analysing sports performance", Journal of Sports Sciences, 4, pp.49~59 (1986)
- Franks, I. M., "Analysis of performance:Qualitative or Quantitative", SPORTS, ~ (1983)
- Hughes, M, "The use of performance indicators in performance analysis", Journal of Sports Sciences, 20, pp.739~754 (2002)
- Hughes, M, "Notational Analysis of Sport" (1997), E & FN SPON
- Hughes, M, "Notational Analysis of Sport; Second Edition" (2004), Routledge
- Hughes, M, "A comparison of patterns of play between the top under 18 junior tennis players in Britain and the rest of the world, in the Science and Racket Sports II" (1998)
- O’Donoghue, P, "A notational analysis of elite tennis strategy", Journal of Sports Sciences, 19, pp.107~115 (2001)
- O’Donoghue, P, "Principal Components Analysis in the selection of Key Performance Indicators in Sport", eIJPAS, 8(3), pp.145~155 (2008)
- Pollard, G. H, "A new tennis scoring system", Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 58, pp.229~233 (1987)
- Sailes, G, "A comparison of three methods of target orientated hitting on baseline ground stroke accuracy in tennis", Journal of Applied Research in Coaching and Athletics, 4, pp.25~34 (1989)