본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Measurement Properties of Physical Activity Questionnaires Used in Studies Involving Populations with Diabetes: A Systematic Review

조정환|송금주
한국체육측정평가학회 (Korean Society For Measurement And Evaluation In Physical Education And Sports Science)|2015.08|한국체육측정평가학회지 (The Korean Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Physical Education and Sports Science)|제17권 제2호|pp. 25-47|DOI 10.21797/ksme.2015.17.2.003

2

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

당뇨병diabetesphysical activity questionnairemeasurement properties신체활동설문지측정도구 특성

초록

Although a large number of questionnaires have been used to assess physical activity in diabetic populations in epidemiological or intervention studies, the measurement properties of physical activity questionnaires (PAQs) used in this population have not yet been reviewed. The purpose of the study was to identify PAQs used in studies involving diabetic populations and to assess the qualitative attributes and the measurement properties of the PAQs. Using MEDLINE, CINAHL, and SPORTDiscus, a systematic literature search was conducted. The Quality Assessment of Physical Activity Questionnaire (QAPAQ) checklist was used to appraise the qualitative attributes and the measurement properties of PAQs included in this review. A total of nine PAQs in nine studies met inclusion criteria. Most of the PAQs had methodological weaknesses with regard to content validity, recall period, ease of use, or interpretability. Of the nine PAQs that provided reliability analyses, none of the PAQs received a positive rating (i.e., the correlation coefficient which is above the specified cut-off point) with the highest level of evidence (i.e., an adequate time interval between test-retest, recommended type of coefficient, and sufficient sample size). Only the long version of International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) tested its reliability with an adequate time interval between test-retest and use of appropriate correlation coefficient, but the correlation coefficient values in some categories of physical activity did not reach the specific cut-off points. In the eight PAQs that tested validity, none of the PAQs received a positive rating with the highest level of evidence (i.e., an adequate comparison instrument and correlation coefficient, and sufficient sample size). However, the Community Health Activities Model Program for Seniors (CHAMPS), Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE), Yale Physical Activity Survey (YPAS), and Pima Indian's Study (PIS) received a positive rating although the correlations coefficients of some categories of physical activity were below the cut-off points. There was no PAQ provided responsiveness analysis. In conclusion, although several PAQs showed a moderate level of results in terms of measurement properties, it is still questionable which PAQ is the most suitable for the use in a diabetic population. Thus, well-designed studies without methodological limitations are needed.

Abstract

Although a large number of questionnaires have been used to assess physical activity in diabetic populations in epidemiological or intervention studies, the measurement properties of physical activity questionnaires (PAQs) used in this population have not yet been reviewed. The purpose of the study was to identify PAQs used in studies involving diabetic populations and to assess the qualitative attributes and the measurement properties of the PAQs. Using MEDLINE, CINAHL, and SPORTDiscus, a systematic literature search was conducted. The Quality Assessment of Physical Activity Questionnaire (QAPAQ) checklist was used to appraise the qualitative attributes and the measurement properties of PAQs included in this review. A total of nine PAQs in nine studies met inclusion criteria. Most of the PAQs had methodological weaknesses with regard to content validity, recall period, ease of use, or interpretability. Of the nine PAQs that provided reliability analyses, none of the PAQs received a positive rating (i.e., the correlation coefficient which is above the specified cut-off point) with the highest level of evidence (i.e., an adequate time interval between test-retest, recommended type of coefficient, and sufficient sample size). Only the long version of International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) tested its reliability with an adequate time interval between test-retest and use of appropriate correlation coefficient, but the correlation coefficient values in some categories of physical activity did not reach the specific cut-off points. In the eight PAQs that tested validity, none of the PAQs received a positive rating with the highest level of evidence (i.e., an adequate comparison instrument and correlation coefficient, and sufficient sample size). However, the Community Health Activities Model Program for Seniors (CHAMPS), Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE), Yale Physical Activity Survey (YPAS), and Pima Indian's Study (PIS) received a positive rating although the correlations coefficients of some categories of physical activity were below the cut-off points. There was no PAQ provided responsiveness analysis. In conclusion, although several PAQs showed a moderate level of results in terms of measurement properties, it is still questionable which PAQ is the most suitable for the use in a diabetic population. Thus, well-designed studies without methodological limitations are needed.

참고문헌 (57)

  1. Adams, S. A., "The effect of social desirability and social approval on self-reports of physical activity", American Journal of Epidemiology, 161, pp.389~398 (2005)
  2. Ainsworth, BE, "Compendium of physical activities: classification of energy costs of human physical activities", Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 25, pp.71~80 (1993)
  3. Babić, Z., "Estimation of physical activity by different questionnaires in overweight subjects and patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus : relationship with anthropometric and metabolic variables. Diabetes", Nutrition & Metabolism, 17, pp.280~289 (2004)
  4. Bacardí-Gascón, M., "A diabetes intervention program of physical activity carried out at primary care settings in Mexico", Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 68, pp.135~140 (2005)
  5. Baecke, J. A. H., "A short questionnaire for the measurement of habitual physical activity in epidemiological studies", American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 36, pp.936~942 (1982)
  6. Blair, S. N., "Assessment of habitual physical activity by a seven-day recall in a community survey and controlled experiments", American Journal of Epidemiology, 122(5), pp.794~804 (1985)
  7. Bowling A., "Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality", Journal of Public Health, 3, pp.281~291 (2005)
  8. Chang, L., "Measuring the frequency of regular behaviors : comparing he 'typical week' to the 'past week'", Sociological Methodology, 33, pp.55~80 (2003)
  9. Chinapaw, M. J. M., "Physical activity questionnaires for youth : a systematic review of measurement properties", Sports Medicine, 40(7), pp.539~563 (2010)
  10. Church, T., "Exercise in obesity, metabolic syndrome, and diabetes", Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases, 53, pp.412~418 (2011)
  11. Crinière, L., "Reproducibility and validity of the French version of the long International Physical Activity Questionnaire in patients with type 2 diabetes", Journal of physical activity & Health, 8, pp.858~865 (2011)
  12. Dipietro, L., "A survey for assessing physical activity among older adults", Medicine & Science in Sport & Exercise, 25(5), pp.628~642 (1993)
  13. Durante, R., "The recall of physical activity : using a cognitive model of the question-answering process", Medicine & Science in Sport & Exercise, 28, pp.1282~1291 (1996)
  14. Fitzpatric, R., "Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials", Health Technology Assessment, 2(4), pp.1~4 (1998)
  15. Forsén, L., "Self-administered physical activity questionnaires for the elderly : a systematic review of measurement properties", Sports Medicine, 40(7), pp.601~623 (2010)
  16. Harada, N. D., "An evaluation of three self-report physical activity instruments for older adults", Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 33(6), pp.962~970 (2001)
  17. Hays LM, "Correlates of physical activity in a sample of older adults with type 2 diabetes", Diabetes Care, 22, pp.706~712 (1999)
  18. Jørstad-Stein, E. C., "Suitability of physical activity questionnaires for older adults in fall-prevention trials : a systematic review", Journal of aging and physical activity, 13, pp.461~481 (2005)
  19. Knowler, W. C., "Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin", New England Journal of Medicine, 346, pp.393~403 (2002)
  20. Kriska, A. M., "Development of questionnaire to examine relationship of physical activity and diabetes in Pima Indians", Diabetes Care, 13, pp.401~411 (1990)
  21. Lagerros, Y. T., "Physical activity-the more we measure, the more we know how to measure", European Journal of Epidemiology, 24, pp.119~122 (2009)
  22. LaPorte, R. E., "Assessment of physical activity in epidemiologic research : problems and prospects", Public Health Reports, 100(2), pp.131~146 (1985)
  23. Le Grande, M. R., "An evaluation of self-report physical activity instruments used in studies involving cardiac patients", Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention, pp.358~369 (2008)
  24. Lichtman, S. W., "Discrepancy between self-reported and actual caloric intake and exercise in obese subjects. New youth : a systematic review of measurement properties", Sports Medicine, 40(7), pp.539~563 (1992)
  25. Church, T., "Exercise in obesity, metabolic syndrome, and diabetes", Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases, 53, pp.412~418 (2011)
  26. Crinière, L., "Reproducibility and validity of the French version of the long International Physical Activity Questionnaire in patients with type 2 diabetes", Journal of physical activity & Health, 8, pp.858~865 (2011)
  27. Dipietro, L., "A survey for assessing physical activity among older adults", Medicine & Science in Sport & Exercise, 25(5), pp.628~642 (1993)
  28. Durante, R., "The recall of physical activity : using a cognitive model of the question-answering process", Medicine & Science in Sport & Exercise, 28, pp.1282~1291 (1996)
  29. Fitzpatric, R., "Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials", Health Technology Assessment, 2(4), pp.1~4 (1998)
  30. Forsén, L., "Self-administered physical activity questionnaires for the elderly : a systematic review of measurement properties", Sports Medicine, 40(7), pp.601~623 (2010)
  31. Harada, N. D., "An evaluation of three self-report physical activity instruments for older adults", Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 33(6), pp.962~970 (2001)
  32. Hays LM, "Correlates of physical activity in a sample of older adults with type 2 diabetes", Diabetes Care, 22, pp.706~712 (1999)
  33. Jørstad-Stein, E. C., "Suitability of physical activity questionnaires for older adults in fall-prevention trials : a systematic review", Journal of aging and physical activity, 13, pp.461~481 (2005)
  34. Knowler, W. C., "Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin", New England Journal of Medicine, 346, pp.393~403 (2002)
  35. Kriska, A. M., "Development of questionnaire to examine relationship of physical activity and diabetes in Pima Indians", Diabetes Care, 13, pp.401~411 (1990)
  36. Lagerros, Y. T., "Physical activity-the more we measure, the more we know how to measure", European Journal of Epidemiology, 24, pp.119~122 (2009)
  37. LaPorte, R. E., "Assessment of physical activity in epidemiologic research : problems and prospects", Public Health Reports, 100(2), pp.131~146 (1985)
  38. Le Grande, M. R., "An evaluation of self-report physical activity instruments used in studies involving cardiac patients", Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention, pp.358~369 (2008)
  39. Lichtman, S. W., "Discrepancy between self-reported and actual caloric intake and exercise in obese subjects", New England Journal of Medicine, 327, pp.1893~1898 (1992)
  40. Mayer, E. J., "Physical-activity-assessment measures compared in a biethnic rural population: the San Luis Valley Diabetes Study", American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 53, pp.812~820 (1991)
  41. Mokkink, L. B., "Protocol of the COSMIN study: COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instrument", BMC Medical Research Methodology, pp.6~2 (2006)
  42. Mynarski, W., "Declared and real physical activity in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus as assessed by the international physical activity questionnaire and caltrac accelerometer monitor: a potential tool for physical activity assessment in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus", Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 98, pp.46~50 (2012)
  43. Paffenbarger, R. S., "Physical activity as an index of heart attack risk in college alumni", American Journal of Epidemiology, 108(3), pp.161~175 (1978)
  44. Pols, M. A., "Methodological aspects of physical activity assessment in epidemiological studies", European Journal of Epidemiology, 14, pp.63~70 (1998)
  45. Shephard, R. J., "Limits to the measurement of habitual physical activity by questionnaires", British Journal of Sports Medicine, 37, pp.197~206 (2003)
  46. Stewart, A. L., "CHAMPS physical activity questionnaire for older adults : outcomes for interventions", Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 33(7), pp.1126~1141 (2001)
  47. Terwee, C. B., "Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires", Journal of clinical epidemiology, 60, pp.34~42 (2007)
  48. Terwee, C. B., "Instruments to assess physical activity in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee : a systematic review of measurement properties", Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 19, pp.620~633 (2011)
  49. Terwee, C. B., "Qualitative attributes and measurement properties of physical activity questionnaires, a checklist", Sports Medicine, 40(7), pp.525~537 (2010)
  50. Tudor-Locke, C. E., "Pedometer-determined ambulatory activity in individuals with type 2 diabetes", Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 55, pp.191~199 (2002)
  51. van Poppel, M. N. M., "Physical activity questionnaires for adults : a systematic review of measurement properties", Sports Medicine, 40(7), pp.565~600 (2010)
  52. van Schie, C. H. M., "Assessment of physical activity in people with diabetes and peripheral neuropathy. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 92", Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 92, pp.e9~e11 (2011)
  53. Wallston, K. A., "Psychometric properties of the perceived diabetes self-management scale(PDSMS)", Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 30, pp.395~401 (2007)
  54. Warren, J. M., "Assessment of physical activity-a review of methodologies with reference to epidemiological research : a report of the exercise physiology section of the European Association of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation", European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation, 17, pp.127~139 (2010)
  55. Washburn, R. A., "Assessment of physical activity in older adults", Research Quarterly for Exercise Sport, 71, pp.S79~S88 (2000)
  56. Washburn, R. A., "The physical activity scale for the elderly(PASE) : development and evaluation", Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 46(2), pp.153~162 (1993)
  57. Yates, T., "Effect of physical activity measurement type on the association between walking activity and glucose regulation in a high-risk population recruited from primary care", International Journal of Epidemiology, 42, pp.533~540 (2013)

관련 논문AI추천

Objectively Measured Physical Activity of Vietnamese Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: Opportunities to InterveneAndy H. Lee, Chung Thanh Nguyen, Jonine Jancey, Minh Van Hoang, Ngoc Minh Pham, Vuong Van Do대한예방의학회 · 예방의학회지2019 · 제52권 제2호Validity and Reliability of Korean Version of International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form in the Elderly전민영대한가정의학회 · Korean Journal of Family Medicine2012 · 제33권 제3호신체활동 측정기반 좌식행동 검사도구의 타당도와 신뢰도 증거 : 체계적 문헌분석이미영한국체육측정평가학회 · 한국체육측정평가학회지2014 · 제16권 제3호Differences between objective and self-report measures of physical activity. What do they mean?Kevin W. Dodd, Richard P. Troiano한국체육측정평가학회 · 한국체육측정평가학회지2008 · 제10권 제2호Home-Based Physical Activity in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Scoping ReviewAliff Abdul Latir, Amirah Mustapa, Haidzir Manaf, Maria Justine대한재활의학회 · Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine2021 · 제45권 제5호Self-efficacy to Engage in Physical Activity and Overcome Barriers, Sedentary Behavior, and Their Relation to Body Mass Index Among Elderly Indonesians With DiabetesDiah Indriani, Hario Megatsari, Mahmud Aditya Rifqi, Qonita Rachmah, Stefania Widya Setyaningtyas, Trias Mahmudiono, Triska Susila Nindya, Wantanee Kriengsinyos대한예방의학회 · 예방의학회지2019 · 제52권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)

배드민턴 경기의 연속득점 및 연속실점과 세트 승률의 관계 : Monte-Carlo 시뮬레이션을 적용한 승률 모형윤효준, 최창환, 박재현pp. 1-11축구 월드컵 대표팀의 선수구성에 따른 참가국 경기분석최형준, 이범수pp. 13-23웨어러블 신체활동 측정도구의 정확성 검증이미영, 최지엽pp. 49-60학교 신체활동 환경지표에 따른 평가기준의 타당도김혜진pp. 61-71평가방법 먼저: 백워드 교육모형 체육수업 설계와 실행이태구, 이한주pp. 73-86
원문 보기