본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

19세기 중반 남부베트남의 공장(工匠, artisans): 비엔 호아(Bien Hoa) 도자기 산업의 사례를 중심으로

Artisans in Southern Vietnam during the Middle of the 19th Century: Case of the Bien Hoa Ceramic Industry

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류지역학

초록

This article deals with the rise of ethnic Vietnamese group in the field of the ceramic industry in southern Vietnam during the middle of the 19th century. In general, it has been believed that this industry had been under the control the ethnic Chinese of this region. But the author tries to find clues to the change in which the ethnic Vietnamese were rising in the field of this job. The change would lead us to an important argument on the issue of the social change of the southern society during that century before the French advance. In the chapter two, 'Appearance of ceramic artisans in Bien Hoa,' the author explains the ethnic complexity of the industry. This region was under the influence of the Cham ceramic tradition before the migration of the ethnic Vietnamese reached. In addition to the two ethnic groups, the Chinese artisans of the Ming refugees during the 17th century also jointed the ceramic industry in Bien Hoa. The mixture of the three ethnic traditions led to the products of the characteristic Dong Nai ceramics. However, the ethnic balance was broken at the end of the 18th century when the Tay Son uprising ruptured this area slaughtering huge numbers of southern Chinese. The Cham tradition had been diluted with the increase of Chinese/Vietnamese population in the Dong Nai region. The result was to see the situation that the Dong Nai ceramic industry began to be transferred to the hands of ethnic Vietnamese artisans. On the other hands, Chinese artisans revived their business in the Saigon area. The chapter three with the title of 'Development of Saigon and the Bien Hoa ceramics' provides evidence for the development of the Bien Hoa ceramic industry in related with the urbanization of the Saigon city during the first half of the 19th century. The urbanization increased the consumption of industrial articles including kinds of ceramics. But the author points out the fact the development of the foreign/domestic trade that appeared in this region also contributed to enhance the level of the demands for the ceramic products. The new brand name of the 'Bien Hoa ceramics' both in domestic and overseas markets during this time can be interpreted as an indication for the rise of this industrial sect during this time. The chapter of 'Southern features of the artisan society in Bien Hoa' introduces the special features of ceramic society of southern Vietnam such as gender, education, and rituals. Many of the features were different from those of Bat Trang in northern Vietnam. The artisans of southern Vietnam declined with the advance of French power, and by the challenge from the Chinese artisans as a result. However, the Bien Hoa ceramic artisans had another chance to recover its power by the help of French colonial government. It was the endorsement of the value by the authority. The French government provided not only finance but also advanced skills. The result was the quick development of the Dong Nai ceramic industry. But the important fact is that the friendly consideration of the French authority was not from nothing but from the tradition of the Bien Hoa ceramics that had been acknowledged by the consumers of the market economy.

Abstract

This article deals with the rise of ethnic Vietnamese group in the field of the ceramic industry in southern Vietnam during the middle of the 19th century. In general, it has been believed that this industry had been under the control the ethnic Chinese of this region. But the author tries to find clues to the change in which the ethnic Vietnamese were rising in the field of this job. The change would lead us to an important argument on the issue of the social change of the southern society during that century before the French advance. In the chapter two, 'Appearance of ceramic artisans in Bien Hoa,' the author explains the ethnic complexity of the industry. This region was under the influence of the Cham ceramic tradition before the migration of the ethnic Vietnamese reached. In addition to the two ethnic groups, the Chinese artisans of the Ming refugees during the 17th century also jointed the ceramic industry in Bien Hoa. The mixture of the three ethnic traditions led to the products of the characteristic Dong Nai ceramics. However, the ethnic balance was broken at the end of the 18th century when the Tay Son uprising ruptured this area slaughtering huge numbers of southern Chinese. The Cham tradition had been diluted with the increase of Chinese/Vietnamese population in the Dong Nai region. The result was to see the situation that the Dong Nai ceramic industry began to be transferred to the hands of ethnic Vietnamese artisans. On the other hands, Chinese artisans revived their business in the Saigon area. The chapter three with the title of 'Development of Saigon and the Bien Hoa ceramics' provides evidence for the development of the Bien Hoa ceramic industry in related with the urbanization of the Saigon city during the first half of the 19th century. The urbanization increased the consumption of industrial articles including kinds of ceramics. But the author points out the fact the development of the foreign/domestic trade that appeared in this region also contributed to enhance the level of the demands for the ceramic products. The new brand name of the 'Bien Hoa ceramics' both in domestic and overseas markets during this time can be interpreted as an indication for the rise of this industrial sect during this time. The chapter of 'Southern features of the artisan society in Bien Hoa' introduces the special features of ceramic society of southern Vietnam such as gender, education, and rituals. Many of the features were different from those of Bat Trang in northern Vietnam. The artisans of southern Vietnam declined with the advance of French power, and by the challenge from the Chinese artisans as a result. However, the Bien Hoa ceramic artisans had another chance to recover its power by the help of French colonial government. It was the endorsement of the value by the authority. The French government provided not only finance but also advanced skills. The result was the quick development of the Dong Nai ceramic industry. But the important fact is that the friendly consideration of the French authority was not from nothing but from the tradition of the Bien Hoa ceramics that had been acknowledged by the consumers of the market economy.

참고문헌 (24)

  1. 김이선, "관광 발달에 따른 타이 수공예품의 생산과 의미체계의 변화: 치앙마이의 목공예 생산지 반타와이를 중심으로", 박사, 인류학과, pp.2003
  2. "大南寔錄前編. 1844. 東京: 慶應義塾大學語學硏究所. 1961", ~ (1961)
  3. "大南寔錄正編第二紀. 1861. 東京: 慶應義塾大學言語文化硏究所. 1963", ~ (1963)
  4. "大南風化考略. n.d. Hanoi: Vien Han Nom A 977", ~
  5. 潘叔直, "國史遺編" (1965), 新亞硏究所
  6. 崔秉旭, "19세기 중반 남부베트남의 대외교역과 베트남 상인층의 성장", 東洋史學硏究, 78 (2002)
  7. Bui Thi Tan and Vu Huy Phuc, "Kinh Te Thu Cong Nghiep va Phat Trien Cong Nghe Viet Nam Duoi Trieu Nguyen (응우옌 왕조 시대 베트남의 수공업 경제와 공예 발전)" (1998), Nxb Thuan Hoa
  8. Cooke, Nola and Li Tana, "Water Frontier: Commerce and the Chinese in the Lower Mekong Region, 1750-1880" (2004), Rowman & Littlefield
  9. "Dai Nam Nhat Thong Chi(大南一統志). 1909. Saigon: Nha Van Hoa Bo Quoc Gia Giao Duc. 1959", ~ (1959)
  10. Finlayson, George, "The Mission to Siam and Hue, the Capital of Cochin China,in the Years 1821-22" (1988), Oxford University Press
  11. Huynh Ngoc Trang, "Gom Cay Mai (꺼이 마이 도기)" (1994), Nxb Tre.
  12. Luong Hy Van, "Culture and Capitalism in the Pottery Enterprises of Bien Hoa, South Vietnam (1878-1975)", Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 22(1) (1991)
  13. "Monographie de la Province de Bien Hoa. Saigon: Imprimerie L. Menard. 1901", ~ (1901)
  14. Nguyen Phan Quang, ""Gop Them Tu Lieu ve Nghe Thu Cong Truyen Thong o Nam Bo Thoi Phap Thuoc (1867-1954) (법속 시기 남부 전통 수공예에 관련된 자료 몇 가지)." Hoi Van Nghe Dan Gian Viet Nam. Xom Nghe & Nghe Thu Cong Truyen Thong Nam Bo (남부 전통 예술 및 수공예 마을). Saigon: Nxb Tre", ~ (2002)
  15. Nguyen Quang Vinh,Tran Ngoc Dinh, ""Truyen Thong Can Man Tai Hoa Coi Mo cua Tho Thu Cong Sai Gon (사이공 수공업자의 피어나는 재주와 근면한 전통)." Tran Van Giau et al. Dia Chi Van Hoa Thanh Pho Ho Chi Minh (호찌민시 문화지리지). Ho Chi Minh City: Nxb Thanh Pho Ho Chi Minh", ~ (1990)
  16. Nguyen The Anh, "Kinh Te va Xa Hoi Viet Nam Duoi Cac Vua Trieu Nguyen (응우옌 왕조 각 왕 치하 베트남의 경제와 사회)" (1970), Lua Thien
  17. Nguyen Thi Hau, ""Lo Gom Co Hung Loi (흥 러이의 옛 도기 가마)." Xua va Nay 56B", ~ (1998)
  18. Nguyen Thi Nguyet, ""Nghe Gom My Nghe Bien Hoa (비엔 호아 미예 예술 도기)." Xua va Nay No. Chuyen De 300 Sai Gon", ~ (1998)
  19. Phan Huy Le, "Gom Bat Trang The Ky 14-19 (14-19세기 밧짱 도자기)" (1995), Nxb The Gioi
  20. Reid, Anthony, "Southeast Asia in the Age of Commerce 1450-1680", Yale University Press
  21. Thach Phuong, "Dia Chi Long An (롱 안 地志)" (1989), Nxb Long An
  22. Tran Hieu Thuan, ""Co Mot Doi Song Van Hoa Gom o Bien Hoa (비엔 호아에 도자기 문화의 생활이 있었다)." Xua va Nay 88", ~ (2001)
  23. Tu Huyen Tran, ""Gom Cham Binh Dinh qua Con Duong To Lua Hang Hai (항해실크로드를 통한 빈 딘의 참 도자기." Xua va Nay 148", ~ (2003)
  24. White, John, "A Voyage to Cochin China" (1972), Oxford University Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)