해지드/보우타이 기법의 한계와 개선에 대하여
A Review of HAZID/Bowtie Methodology and its Improvement
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
A HAZID is a brainstorming workshop to identify hazards in an early phase of a project. It should be flexible to capture all probable accidents allowing experienced participants to exploit their expertise and experiences. A bowtie analysis is a graphical representation of major accident hazards elaborating safety measures i.e. barriers. The result of these workshops should be documented in an organized manner to share as good as possible details of the discussion through the lifetime of the project. Currently results are documented using a three-step representation of an accident; causes, top event and consequences, which cannot capture correctly sequence of events leading to various accidents and roles of barrier between two events. Another problem is that barriers would be shown repeatedly leading to a misunderstanding that there are an enough number of safety measures. A new bowtie analysis method is proposed to describe an accident in multiple steps showing relations among causes or consequences. With causes and consequences shown in a format of a tree, the frequencies of having the top event (Fault tree analysis) and various consequences (Event tree analysis) are evaluated automatically based on the frequency of initiating causes and the probabilities of failure of barriers. It will provide a good description of the accident scenario and help the risk to be assessed transparently.
Abstract
A HAZID is a brainstorming workshop to identify hazards in an early phase of a project. It should be flexible to capture all probable accidents allowing experienced participants to exploit their expertise and experiences. A bowtie analysis is a graphical representation of major accident hazards elaborating safety measures i.e. barriers. The result of these workshops should be documented in an organized manner to share as good as possible details of the discussion through the lifetime of the project. Currently results are documented using a three-step representation of an accident; causes, top event and consequences, which cannot capture correctly sequence of events leading to various accidents and roles of barrier between two events. Another problem is that barriers would be shown repeatedly leading to a misunderstanding that there are an enough number of safety measures. A new bowtie analysis method is proposed to describe an accident in multiple steps showing relations among causes or consequences. With causes and consequences shown in a format of a tree, the frequencies of having the top event (Fault tree analysis) and various consequences (Event tree analysis) are evaluated automatically based on the frequency of initiating causes and the probabilities of failure of barriers. It will provide a good description of the accident scenario and help the risk to be assessed transparently.
참고문헌 (12)
- "Guidance Notes on Review and Approval of Novel Concepts", ABS, ~ (2017)
- "BOWTIE MASTER"[URL]
- "Features of BowTie Pro"[URL]
- CCPS, "Bow ties in risk management: A concept book for process safety" (2018), Wiley
- "CGE,BowTieXP"[URL]
- "Risk Based Certification" (2022)[URL]
- "SYNERGI LIFE Barrier Management module"[URL]
- "ISO 17776:2002. Petroleum and natural gas industries – Offshore production installations – Guidelines on toold and techniques for hazard identification and risk assessment", ~
- "ISO 17776:2016. Petroleum and natural gas industries – Offshore production installations – Major Accident hazard management during the design of new installations", ~
- John S., "A guide to quantitative risk assessment for offshore installations", CMPT, ~ (1999)
- "Guidance for Approval of Risk-based ship design", Korean Register, ~ (2015)
- "ShipRight Design and Construction:Additional Design Procedure – Risk Based Designs (RBD)", Lloyd’s Register, ~ (2018)
