19세기 전반 베트남 제국(帝國)의 국제질서
The World Order of Vietnamese Empire during the First Half of the 19th Century
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study examines the nature of the world order or the international relations of the 19th century Vietnam. Those who are familiar with the Chinese world order based on the tributary system, have applied the quasi-Chinese world order concept to Vietnam by the terms of 'smaller dragon,' 'little China,' and 'Chinese model.' According to this way of understanding, Vietnamese empire was the imitation or the small sized version of the Chinese empire. Examples are to label Vietnamese emperor as the "Southeast Asian version of the Chinese emperor" or "an absolute photocopy of the Chinese world order."But the author of this article raises questions to this framework of the Chinese Model, and looks for the Vietnamese own world order based on the Southeast Asian tradition. Two issues are discussed in this study. First is the Vietnamese relationships with Southeast Asia. According to author, the first concern of Vietnam in relation to diplomatic relations was to the Mainland Southeast Asian countries. To clarify the contacts with Southeast Asia and Western powers, Vietnamese relationships with the regions of Island Southeast Asian countries were also examined. Second issue is to see the ways how Vietnam maintained its own world order in the course of wars and diplomacy with China. Author argues that the world order of the 19th century Vietnam was closer to the traditional world order of mandala in the Southeast Asia than to the quasi Chinese world order. The relationships among the countries were rather equal than hierarchical. Vietnam regarded the countries of Southeast Asia especially Thailand and Burma as the equal countries. China was one of the equal countries to the eyes of Vietnamese leaders and Vietnam did not have enough room to embody the quasi Chinese world order though the Vietnamese rulers used the titles of emperor, which was the Vietnamese version of Southeast Asian 'king.'In conclusion, the world order of Vietnam is summarized into the two facets of lân giao(diplomatic relations with neighbors) and bang giao(diplomatic relations between two countries i.e. Vietnam and China). Lân giao was to the countries of Southeast Asia while the bang giao was the term and concept for the diplomatic relationship with China. These two relationships composed Vietnamese foreign relationship, ngoại giao. Author claims that these two relations were based on the spirit of equality that emerged from the beginning of the 19th century.
Abstract
This study examines the nature of the world order or the international relations of the 19th century Vietnam. Those who are familiar with the Chinese world order based on the tributary system, have applied the quasi-Chinese world order concept to Vietnam by the terms of 'smaller dragon,' 'little China,' and 'Chinese model.' According to this way of understanding, Vietnamese empire was the imitation or the small sized version of the Chinese empire. Examples are to label Vietnamese emperor as the "Southeast Asian version of the Chinese emperor" or "an absolute photocopy of the Chinese world order."But the author of this article raises questions to this framework of the Chinese Model, and looks for the Vietnamese own world order based on the Southeast Asian tradition. Two issues are discussed in this study. First is the Vietnamese relationships with Southeast Asia. According to author, the first concern of Vietnam in relation to diplomatic relations was to the Mainland Southeast Asian countries. To clarify the contacts with Southeast Asia and Western powers, Vietnamese relationships with the regions of Island Southeast Asian countries were also examined. Second issue is to see the ways how Vietnam maintained its own world order in the course of wars and diplomacy with China. Author argues that the world order of the 19th century Vietnam was closer to the traditional world order of mandala in the Southeast Asia than to the quasi Chinese world order. The relationships among the countries were rather equal than hierarchical. Vietnam regarded the countries of Southeast Asia especially Thailand and Burma as the equal countries. China was one of the equal countries to the eyes of Vietnamese leaders and Vietnam did not have enough room to embody the quasi Chinese world order though the Vietnamese rulers used the titles of emperor, which was the Vietnamese version of Southeast Asian 'king.'In conclusion, the world order of Vietnam is summarized into the two facets of lân giao(diplomatic relations with neighbors) and bang giao(diplomatic relations between two countries i.e. Vietnam and China). Lân giao was to the countries of Southeast Asia while the bang giao was the term and concept for the diplomatic relationship with China. These two relationships composed Vietnamese foreign relationship, ngoại giao. Author claims that these two relations were based on the spirit of equality that emerged from the beginning of the 19th century.
참고문헌 (31)
- 김한규, "천하국가 - 전통시대 동아시아 세계질서" (2005), 소나무
- "大南寔錄前編 1844" (1961), 慶應義塾大學語學硏究所
- "大南寔錄正編第一紀 1848" (1968), 慶應義塾大學言語文化硏究所
- "大南寔錄正編第二紀 1861" (1963), 慶應義塾大學言語文化硏究所
- "大南寔錄正編第三紀 1894" (1977), 慶應義塾大學言語文化硏究所
- "大南正編列傳初集 1889" (1962), 慶應義塾大學語學硏究所
- 桃木至朗, "十-十五世紀べトナム國家の‘南’と‘西’", pp.51~53 (1992), 東洋史硏究
- 明命政要, "Saigon: Bộ Văn Hóa và Thanh Niên, 1972-74" (1897)
- 潘輝注, "Récit sommaire d'un voyage en mer" (1994), Paris, Cahier d'Archipel
- 小泉順子, "ラタナコーシン朝一世王期シャムの對外關係-廣域地域像の檢討にむけた豫備的考察", 東洋文化硏究所紀要, 154 (2008)
- 유인선, "전근대 베트남의 對中國認識 - 조공과 대등의식의 양면성", 동북아역사논총, (23), pp.389~436 (2009), 동북아역사재단
- 유인선, "베트남 완조의 성립과 ‘大南’ 帝國秩序", 아시아문화, (10) (1994), 한림대학교아시아문화연구소
- 淸會典事例(光緖), "中華書局影印本" (1991)
- 최병욱, "19세기 전반(1823-1847) 베트남의 동남아시아 官船貿易", 동양사학연구, 70 (2000)
- 최병욱, "19세기 베트남의 단일민족 만들기 - ‘漢夷有限’에서‘一視同仁’으로 -", 동북아역사논총, (23), pp.73~97 (2009), 동북아역사재단
- 최병욱, "역대 중국의 판도 형성과 변강. In: 19세기 전반 ‘6맹(猛) 지역’에 대한 중국 - 베트남의 지배권 논쟁: ‘역사성’과 ‘현재성’의 대립 -" (2008), 한신대학교출판부
- 최희재, "越南, 朝鮮과 1860-80년대 淸朝 朝貢國政策의 再調整", 역사학보, 206(206), pp.179~209 (2010), 역사학회
- 坪井善明, "近代ヴエトナム政治社會史- 阮朝嗣德帝通治下のヴエトナム, 1847-1883" (1991), 東京大學出版部
- 欽定大南會典事例, "Viên Hán Nôm VHv 1570" (1851), Hanoi
- Brodrick, A. H, "Little China, the Annamese Lands" (1942), Oxford University Press, London
- Buttinger, Joseph, "The Smaller Dragon: A Political History of Vietnam" (1958), Prager
- Choi Byung Wook, "Southern Vietnam under the Reign of Minh Mang(1820-1841): Central Policies and Local Response" (2004), SEAP, Cornell University
- Choi Byung Wook, "탕 롱의 자 롱, 1802년 음력 7월 21부터 9월 27일까지", 수도 하노이의 확고한 발전, pp.7~9 (2010), Hanoi
- Fairbank, John K, "The Chinese World Order" (1968), Harvard University Press
- Kelley, Liem C, "Beyond the Bronze Pillars, Envoy Poetry and the Sino-Vietnamese Relationship" (2005), Hawaii University Press
- Myoe, Maung Aung, "Diplomacy and War: Myanmar's Relations with China in 17th and 18th Centuries", 인하대학교 한국학연구소 ‘동아시아한국학’ 학술회의 발표논문집 - 동아시아 질서의 변화와 중화론 (2008)
- Nguyễn Thế Anh, "응우옌 왕조와 우리의 역사. In: 19세기 초반 인도차이나반도 내 외교 게임에 대한 인식" (2008), Nxb Văn Hóa Sài Gòn
- Owen, Norman G., "The Emergence of Modern Southeast Asia" (2005), University of Hawaii Press
- Taylor, Keith W, "Southeast Asia in the Early Modern Era, Trade, Power, and Belief. In: Nguyen Hoang and Vietnam's Southward Expansion" (1993), Cornell University Press
- Wolters, Oliver, "History, Culture, and Region in Southeast Asian Perspectives" (1999), SEAP, Cornell University
- Woodside, Alexander Barton, "Vietnam and the Chinese Model" (1971), Harvard University Press
