싱가포르는 왜 민주화되지 않는가? 비교연구 방법을 활용한 지역연구
Why Has Singapore Not Democratized? An Example of Regional Studies Using Comparative Methods
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
현지조사를 통해 특정 국가나 지역의 맥락을 깊이 있게 이해함으로써 관심 사 안에 대한 답을 구하는 단일사례연구가 전통적인 지역연구의 방법이라 할 수 있다. 본 논문은 아직 민주주의로의 전환을 경험하지 않은 싱가포르를 사례로 비교연구 방법을 활용하는 지역연구의 예를 제시한다. 지역연구에서 비교연 구 방법을 활용하면 단일 사례로부터 관찰한 연구 질문의 중요성을 높이고, 주 장의 타당성을 높이며, 사회과학 이론 발전에도 기여할 수 있다.
Abstract
A conventional research method in regional studies is the single-case study that typically requires field research for a deep understanding of the context of a country or a region. In this article I investigate why Singapore has not democratized as an example of regional studies using comparative methods. Such regional studies can raise the importance of research questions deriving from single-case studies, increase the validity of arguments, and contribute to the development of theories in social sciences.
참고문헌 (30)
- 리콴유, "리콴유 자서전" (1999), 문학사상사
- 서경교, "동남아시아 대중들의 민주주의에 대한 인식", 국제지역연구, 20(1), pp.145~172 (2016), 국제지역연구센터[DOI]
- 소노다 시게토, "아시아 바로미터 5장" (2009), 소화
- 이종석, "새로 쓴 현대 북한의 이해" (2008), 역사비평사
- 정상률, "석유지대의 정치경제와 아랍 민주주의", 중동연구, 30(3), pp.83~115 (2012), 중동연구소
- 정해조, "지역연구의 연구방법론(1)", 국제지역연구, 2(2), pp.317~334 (1998)
- Art, David, "What Do We Know About Authoritarianism After Ten Years?", Comparative Politics, 44(3), pp.351~373 (2012)
- Bunce, Valerie, "Why Communism Did Not Collapse:Understanding Authoritarian Regime Resilience in Asia and Europe", pp.123~148 (2013), Cambridge University Press
- Cheibub, José Antonio, "Democracy and Dictatorship Revisited", Public Choice, 143(1-2), pp.67~101 (2010)
- Clark, William Roberts, "Principles of Comparative Politics" (2017), CQ Press
- Gandhi, Jennifer, "Elections and Political Regimes", Government and Opposition, 50(3), pp.446~468 (2015)
- Geddes, Barbara, "How Dictatorships Work: Power, Personalization, and Collapse" (2018), Cambridge University Press
- Geddes, Barbara, "Paradigms and Sand Castles: Theory Building and Research Design in Comparative Politics" (2003), University of Michigan Press
- Geddes, Barbara, "What Do We Know about Democratization after Twenty Years?", Annual Review of Political Science, 2, pp.115~144 (1999)
- Golafshani, Nahid, "Understanding Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research", The Qualitative Report, 8(4), pp.597~607 (2003)
- Ishiyama, John T., "Comparative Politics: Principles of Democracy and Democratization" (2012), Wiley-Blackwell
- Khong, Cho-Oon, "Political Legitimacy in Southeast Asia", pp.108~135 (1995), Stanford University Press
- Kim, Yung-Myung, "“Asian-Style Democracy”: A Critique from East Asia", Asian Survey, 37(12), pp.1119~1134 (1997)
- King, Gary, "Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research" (1994), Princeton University Press
- Lee, Terence, "The Media, Cultural Control and Government in Singapore" (2010), Routledge
- Lange, Glenn-Marie, "The Changing Wealth of Nations 2018: Building a Sustainable Future" (2018), World Bank
- Magaloni, Beatriz, "Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and its Demise in Mexico" (2006), Cambridge University Press
- Moore, Barrington, "Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World" (1966), Beacon Press
- Przeworski, Adam, "Democracy and Development:Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950-1990" (2000), Cambridge University Press
- Rodan, Garry, "Transparency and Authoritarian Rule in Southeast Asia: Singapore and Malaysia" (2004), Routledge Curzon
- Sen, Amartya Kumar, "Democracy as a Universal Value", Journal of Democracy, 10(3), pp.3~17 (1999)[DOI]
- Slater, Dan, "Ordering Power: Contentious Politics and Authoritarian Leviathans in Southeast Asia" (2010), Cambridge University Press
- Thompson, Mark R., "Authoritarian Modernism in East Asia" (2019), Palgrave Macmillan
- Verweij, Marco, "Singapore: Does Authoritarianism Pay?", Journal of Democracy, 20(2), pp.18~32 (2009)
- Wright, Joseph, "Authoritarian Institutions and Regime Survival: Transitions to Democracy and Subsequent Autocracy", British Journal of Political Science, 42(2), pp.283~309 (2012)
