본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

FuelEU Maritime 규제 적용에 따른 해양 연료의 영향분석 및 대응방안 연구

A Study on Impact and Countermeasures of Marine Fuels in the FuelEU Maritime Regulation

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류조선공학

초록

This study performed the analysis on an economic feasibility of each marine fuel, potential fuel pathways and the relevance of compliance measures to ensure compliance with the FuelEU Maritime regulation. Additionally, it identified certain regulatory gaps to encourage the use of alternative marine fuels. Regarding GHG emissions calculations, the existing GHG regulations for ships applies the Tank-to-Wake (TtW) method, whereas FuelEU Maritime applies the Well-to-Wake (WtW) method. The main results present that important information to establish response strategy for FuelEU Maritime including the costs and benefits of each marine fuel, the minimum blending ratio of alternative fules, and compliance impacts of measures. For the regulatory costs and benefits of marine fuels following the implementation of the FuelEU Maritime from 2025, our findings indicate that while most fossil fuels incur regulatory costs from 2025, most of biofuels and RFNBO fuels do not incur costs until 2050. This will play a role to narrow the price gap between fossil fuels and alternative fuels.

Abstract

This study performed the analysis on an economic feasibility of each marine fuel, potential fuel pathways and the relevance of compliance measures to ensure compliance with the FuelEU Maritime regulation. Additionally, it identified certain regulatory gaps to encourage the use of alternative marine fuels. Regarding GHG emissions calculations, the existing GHG regulations for ships applies the Tank-to-Wake (TtW) method, whereas FuelEU Maritime applies the Well-to-Wake (WtW) method. The main results present that important information to establish response strategy for FuelEU Maritime including the costs and benefits of each marine fuel, the minimum blending ratio of alternative fules, and compliance impacts of measures. For the regulatory costs and benefits of marine fuels following the implementation of the FuelEU Maritime from 2025, our findings indicate that while most fossil fuels incur regulatory costs from 2025, most of biofuels and RFNBO fuels do not incur costs until 2050. This will play a role to narrow the price gap between fossil fuels and alternative fuels.

참고문헌 (15)

  1. Christodoulou, A., "Potential alternativ e fuel pathways for compliance with the ‘FuelEU Maritime In itiative’", Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Envi ronment, 112, pp.103492~ (2022)
  2. "Fit for 55" (2022)[URL]
  3. European Parliament and Council, "Regulation (EU) 2015", 757 of the European parliament and of the couoncilof 29 April 2015 on the monitoring, reporting and verification of c arbon dioxide emissions from maritime transport, and amen ding Directive 2009, EC, 2015[DOI]
  4. European Parliament and Council, "Directive (EU) 2018", 2001 of the European parliament and of the council of 11 December 2018 on the promotion of the use of energy fro m renewable sources (recast), 2018
  5. European Parliament and Council, "Regulation (EU) 2023", 1805 of the European parliament and of the council of 13 September 2023 on the use of renewable and low-carbon fuels in maritime transport, and amending Directive 2009, EC, 2023[DOI]
  6. European Commission, "Commission delegated regulatio n (EU) 2020", 1044 of 8 May 2020 supplementing regulation (EU) 2018, 2014 (1999), 2020[DOI]
  7. 2014: Synthesis report. Contribution of working group I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, "Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change(IPCC)", IPCC, ~ (2014)
  8. Fourth IMO G HG Study, "International Maritime Organization(IMO)", IMO, ~ (2020)
  9. "Revised GH G reduction strategy for global shipping adopted" (2023)[URL]
  10. International Maritime Organization(IMO), "MEPC.1", Cir c.905, Interim Guidance on the use of biofuels under regul ations 26, 27 and 28 of MARPOL Annex VI (DCS and CII), 2023
  11. International Maritime Organization (IMO), "ISWG-GHG 11", 2, pp.2022, ~
  12. Kim, J. H., "EU’s new GHG regulations for international s hipping – latest trends and impacts of EU ETS and FuelEU Maritime", SNAKZINE, 59(6), pp.16~19 (2022)
  13. Kramel, D., "Global shipping emissions from a well-to-wake perspe ctive: The MariTEAM model", Environmental Science & Tech nology, 55, pp.15040~15050 (2021)
  14. Lindstad, E., "Reduction of maritime GHG emissions a nd the potential role of e-fuels", Transportation Research P art D : Transport and Environment, 101, pp.103075~ (2021)
  15. Solakivi, T., "Cost competi tiveness of alternative maritime fuels in the new regulatory fr amework", Transportation Research Part D : Transport and E nvironment, 113, pp.103500~ (2022)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)