Differentiated Tax Strategies for Companies according to Market Position
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
[Purpose] This research studied the differences in tax strategies of companies according to their market position, particularly the difference in the degree of tax avoidance between leading companies and following companies. [Methodology] Since a leading company is more likely to maintain a consistent revenue and be able to easily obtain necessary capital, there is little need for them to perform an aggressive tax strategy with a high political cost and audit risk. On the other hand, a following company is more likely to adopt an aggressive tax strategy and reduce taxes to increase free cash flow. In order to prove this, differences in tax avoidance by market position was observed. Tax avoidance measurement by Desai and Dharmapala (2006) was used as the dependent variable and market position variable as the independent variable. [Findings] Analysis showed that the two variables had a significant negative association, demonstrating that following companies are performing tax avoidance more aggressively than leading companies. [Implications] This study can be used as evidentiary material for tax authorities during tax audits. Tax audit criteria is a very important start in the current tax auditing process that is expanding on tax audit by non－regular selection. Therefore, this study may become a key academic evidence for tax authorities in providing criteria for tax auditing by non－regular selection.
Abstract
[Purpose] This research studied the differences in tax strategies of companies according to their market position, particularly the difference in the degree of tax avoidance between leading companies and following companies. [Methodology] Since a leading company is more likely to maintain a consistent revenue and be able to easily obtain necessary capital, there is little need for them to perform an aggressive tax strategy with a high political cost and audit risk. On the other hand, a following company is more likely to adopt an aggressive tax strategy and reduce taxes to increase free cash flow. In order to prove this, differences in tax avoidance by market position was observed. Tax avoidance measurement by Desai and Dharmapala (2006) was used as the dependent variable and market position variable as the independent variable. [Findings] Analysis showed that the two variables had a significant negative association, demonstrating that following companies are performing tax avoidance more aggressively than leading companies. [Implications] This study can be used as evidentiary material for tax authorities during tax audits. Tax audit criteria is a very important start in the current tax auditing process that is expanding on tax audit by non－regular selection. Therefore, this study may become a key academic evidence for tax authorities in providing criteria for tax auditing by non－regular selection.
참고문헌 (38)
- Blaylock, B., "Tax avoidance, large positive temporary book-tax differences, and earnings persistence", The Accounting Review, 87(1), pp.91~120 (2011)
- Chen, S., "Are family firms more tax aggressive than non-family firms?", Journal of Financial Economics, 95(1), pp.41~61 (2010)
- Christensen, J., "The social irresponsibility of corporate tax avoidance：Taking CSR to the bottom line", Development, 47(3), pp.37~44 (2004)
- Clark, J., "Innovation and competitiveness：a review", Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 10(3), pp.363~395 (1998)
- Desai, M., "Corporate tax avoidance and High Powered Incentives", Journal of Financial Economics, 79, pp.145~179 (2006)
- Dyreng, S., "Long-run corporate tax avoidance", The Accounting Review, 83(1), pp.61~82 (2008)
- Edwards, A., "Financial constraints and cash tax savings", The Accounting Review, 91(3), pp.859~881 (2016)
- Long-term market leadership persistence：Baselines, economic conditions, and category types, "Golder, P. N.", Marketing Science Institute, 13~110 (2013)
- Graham, J., "Tax Shelters and Corporate Debt Policy", Journal of Financial Economics, 81, pp.563~594 (2006)
- Graham, J., "Real effects of accounting rules：Evidence from multinational firms’ investment location and profit repatriation decisions", Journal of Accounting Research, 49(1), pp.137~185 (2011)
- Hanlon, M., "A review of tax research", Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2-3), pp.127~178 (2010)
- Higgins, D., "Does a Firm’s Business Strategy Influence its Level of Tax Avoidance?", American Taxation Association Midyear Meeting：JATA Conference (2011)
- Higgins, D., "The Influence of a Firm’s Business Strategy on its Tax Aggressiveness", Contemporary Account Research, 3(22), pp.674~702 (2015)
- Hillenbrand, C., "Corporate tax：What do stakeholders expect?", Journal of Business Ethics, 158(2), pp.403~426 (2019)
- 장현규, "경기변동에 따른 선도기업의 차별적 원가전략", 회계ㆍ세무와 감사 연구, 62(2), pp.153~184 (2020), 한국공인회계사회[DOI]
- Kern, B. B., "Taxes and firm size：The effect of tax legislation during the 1980s", Journal of the American Taxation Association, 14, pp.80~96 (1992)
- 김현아, "산업 내 경쟁과 선도기업의 비대칭적 원가행태", 회계저널, 24(5), pp.103~139 (2015), 한국회계학회
- 김진회, "기업의 재무적 특성이 조세회피에 미치는 영향", 세무학연구, 23(4), pp.97~124 (2006), 한국세무학회
- Kim, J., "Corporate tax avoidance and stock price crash risk：Firm -level analysis", Journal of Financial Economics, 100(3), pp.639~662 (2011)
- 고윤성, "조세회피와 기업특성 및 기업가치에 관한 연구", 세무학연구, 24(4), pp.9~40 (2007), 한국세무학회
- Lanis, R., "The effect of board of director composition on corporate tax aggressiveness", Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 30(1), pp.50~70 (2011)
- Lanis, R., "The impact of corporate tax avoidance on board of directors and CEO reputation", Journal of Business Ethics, 160(2), pp.463~498 (2019)
- 이상환, "세무조사대상자 선정과 조사방법에 관한 연구", 세무와 회계연구, 8(2), pp.193~240 (2019), 한국세무사회 부설 한국조세연구소[DOI]
- 이우재, "수명주기에 따른 기업의 재무보고이익과 세무보고이익의 차이와 조세회피 성향", 산업경제연구, 28(1), pp.381~402 (2015), 한국산업경제학회
- Liberman, M. B., "Montgomery, 1988, “First-mover advantage", Strategy Management Journal, 9, pp.41~58 (1988)
- Manzon, J., "The relation between financial and tax reporting measures of income", Tax Law Review, 55, pp.175~214 (2002)
- Miles, R. E., "Organizational strategy, structure, and process", Academy of Management Review, 3(3), pp.546~562 (1978)
- 오광욱, "계속감사기간과 조세전략의 지속가능성의 관계", 회계와 정책연구, 23(4), pp.231~253 (2018), 한국회계정책학회[DOI]
- Omer, T. C., "Measurement of Effective Corporate Tax Rates Using Financial Statement Information", The Journal of the American Taxation Association, 13(1), pp.57~72 (1991)
- 박성원, "재무적 제약과 조세회피", 회계저널, 23(4), pp.339~382 (2014), 한국회계학회
- 박종국, "조세회피와 외국인지분율", 세무학연구, 26(1), pp.105~135 (2009), 한국세무학회
- Porcano, T. M., "Corporate Tax Rates：Progressive, Proportoinal or Regressive", The Journal of the American Taxation Association, (Spring), pp.17~31 (1986)
- Robinson, J., "Performance Measurement of Corporate Tax Departments", The Accounting Review, 85, pp.1035~1064 (2010)
- Scholes, M. S., "Taxes and business strategy：A planning approach" (2009), Prentice Hall
- Shackelford, D. A., "Empirical tax research in accounting", Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1-3), pp.321~387 (2001)
- Whait, R. B., "What do we know about tax aggressiveness and corporate social responsibility? An integrative review", Journal of Cleaner Production, 204, pp.542~552 (2018)
- Wilkie, P. J., "Measuring Explicit Tax (Dis)Adventage for Corporate Taxpayers：An Alternative to Average Effective Tax Rate", Journal of the American Taxation Association, 15, pp.46~71 (1993)
- Zimmerman, J. L., "Taxes and firm size", Journal of Accounting and Economics, 5, pp.119~149 (1983)