The Impact of Outside Directors with Multiple Directorships on Credit Rating
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
[Purpose] This study empirically analyzes the effect of outside directors with multiple directorships on the credit ratings measured by a professional credit rating agency. It aims to show that the existence of multiple directorships constitutes valuable information in the evaluation of corporate governance. [Methodology] In order to attempt various analyses, balanced panel data were used, by drawing from nine years of data between 2011 and 2019. Correlation and Ordinary Least Square (OLS) analyses were performed on 4,712 samples. Ordered logit and probit analyses were conducted to reflect the characteristics of the variables. Panel analysis was also performed. [Findings] In the OLS and ordered logit and probit analyses, outside directors with multiple directorships had a significant negative relationship with credit rating. In contrast, inside directors did not have significant results. However, the panel analysis confirmed that both directors had a significant negative relationship with credit rating. [Implications] This study is meaningful in that it confirmed the negative relationship between multiple directorships and credit rating, and showed that this information is also reflected in the evaluation of professional credit rating agencies. Information on multiple directorships can have implications for corporate governance.
Abstract
[Purpose] This study empirically analyzes the effect of outside directors with multiple directorships on the credit ratings measured by a professional credit rating agency. It aims to show that the existence of multiple directorships constitutes valuable information in the evaluation of corporate governance. [Methodology] In order to attempt various analyses, balanced panel data were used, by drawing from nine years of data between 2011 and 2019. Correlation and Ordinary Least Square (OLS) analyses were performed on 4,712 samples. Ordered logit and probit analyses were conducted to reflect the characteristics of the variables. Panel analysis was also performed. [Findings] In the OLS and ordered logit and probit analyses, outside directors with multiple directorships had a significant negative relationship with credit rating. In contrast, inside directors did not have significant results. However, the panel analysis confirmed that both directors had a significant negative relationship with credit rating. [Implications] This study is meaningful in that it confirmed the negative relationship between multiple directorships and credit rating, and showed that this information is also reflected in the evaluation of professional credit rating agencies. Information on multiple directorships can have implications for corporate governance.
참고문헌 (23)
- Ahn, S., "Multiple directorships and acquirer returns", Journal of Banking & Finance, 34(9), pp.2011~2026 (2010)[DOI]
- Anderson, R. C., "Board characteristics, accounting report integrity, and the cost of debt", Journal of Accounting and Economics, 37(3), pp.315~342 (2004)[DOI]
- Ashbaugh－Skaife, H., "The effects of corporate governance on firms’ credit ratings", Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42(1-2), pp.203~243 (2006)[DOI]
- Beaver, W. H., "Differential properties in the ratings of certified versus non－certified bond－rating agencies", Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42(3), pp.303~334 (2006)[DOI]
- Bhojraj, S., "Effect of corporate governance on bond ratings and yields ：The role of institutional investors and outside directors", The journal of Business, 76(3), pp.455~475 (2003)[DOI]
- Carpenter, M. A., "The Strategic Context of External Network Ties ：Examining the Impact of Director Appointments on Board Involvement in Strategic Decision making", Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), pp.639~660 (2001)[DOI]
- Cashman, G. D., "Going overboard? On busy directors and firm value", Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(12), pp.3248~3259 (2012)[DOI]
- Core, J. E., "Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation, and firm performance", Journal of Financial Economics, 51(3), pp.371~406 (1999)[DOI]
- Ferris, S. P., "Too Busy to Mind the Business? Monitoring by Directors with Multiple Board Appointments", The Journal of Finance, 58(3), pp.1087~1111 (2003)[DOI]
- Fich, E. M., "Are Busy Boards Effective Monitors?", The Journal of Finance, 61(2), pp.689~724 (2006)[DOI]
- Fitch, R., "Credit policy special report, evaluating corporate governance：The bondholders’ perspective" (2004), Fitch Ratings
- Frost, C. A., "Credit rating agencies in capital markets：A review of research evidence on selected criticisms of the agencies", Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 22(3), pp.469~492 (2007)[DOI]
- Jiraporn, P., "Multiple Directorships and Corporate Diversification", Journal of Empirical Finance, 15(3), pp.418~435 (2008)[DOI]
- Jiraporn, P., "Ineffective Corporate Governance：Director Busyness and Board Committee Memberships", Journal of Banking & Finance, 33(5), pp.819~828 (2009)[DOI]
- Loderer, C., "Board Overlap, Seat Accumulation and Share Prices", European Financial Management, 8(2), pp.165~192 (2002)[DOI]
- 박정환, "등기이사의 이사직 겸임과 기업가치", 회계정보연구, 35(3), pp.1~27 (2017), 한국회계정보학회
- Jeong hwan Park, "The Effect of Multiple Directorships on Investment Efficiency", Global Business and Finance Review, 24(2), pp.43~57 (2019), 사람과세계경영학회[DOI]
- Park, J. H., "The impact of Registered Directors with Multiple Directorships on Corporate Diversification", The Journal of Korea Tax Accounting Research, (66), pp.141~163 (2020)
- 박종일, "이익유연화, 보수적 회계처리 및 재량적 발생액이 신용등급에 미치는 영향", 경영학연구, 40(4), pp.1015~1053 (2011), 한국경영학회
- 박준령, "기업지배구조가 신용등급과 자본비용에 미치는 영향에 관한 실증적 연구－지배구조 평가점수를 중심으로－", 국제회계연구, (77), pp.199~224 (2018), 한국국제회계학회[DOI]
- 박종성, "국내 기업 지배구조가 회사채 신용점수에 미치는 영향", 금융정보연구, 5(1), pp.1~31 (2016), 한국금융정보학회
- 신재용, "기업지배구조가 이익과 신용등급간의 관련성에 미치는 효과", 경영학연구, 41(6), pp.1309~1345 (2012), 한국경영학회
- Standard & Poor’s, "Standard & Poor’s Corporate Governance Scores：Criteria, Methodology and Definitions" (2002), McGraw－Hill Companies, Inc.