본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Board Interlocks and Audit Fees

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

[Purpose] This study examined the relationship between board interlocks and audit fees with the primary objective of determining their significant impact on audit fees, and, by extension, corporate risk and information asymmetry. [Methodology] A sample of 2,560 firm-year observations from 2015 to 2019 was analyzed. Specifically, we examined both the number and mean value of board interlocks owned by firms and differentiates between general and abnormally high audit fees. [Findings] The results showed that the number of board interlocks firms hold is not significantly related to normal audit fees. However, both the number and mean value of board interlocks of internal directors had a significantly negative relationship with abnormally high audit fees, indicating that a higher number or greater mean value of board interlocks leads to a reduction in abnormal audit fees. [Implications] This study highlights the importance of understanding corporate characteristics related to board interlocks by considering both their number and mean value. Our findings suggest that board interlocks reduce audit risk by decreasing corporate uncertainty and information asymmetry. Therefore, in the future, it may be necessary to establish standards or guidelines for utilizing board interlocks in corporate governance.

Abstract

[Purpose] This study examined the relationship between board interlocks and audit fees with the primary objective of determining their significant impact on audit fees, and, by extension, corporate risk and information asymmetry. [Methodology] A sample of 2,560 firm-year observations from 2015 to 2019 was analyzed. Specifically, we examined both the number and mean value of board interlocks owned by firms and differentiates between general and abnormally high audit fees. [Findings] The results showed that the number of board interlocks firms hold is not significantly related to normal audit fees. However, both the number and mean value of board interlocks of internal directors had a significantly negative relationship with abnormally high audit fees, indicating that a higher number or greater mean value of board interlocks leads to a reduction in abnormal audit fees. [Implications] This study highlights the importance of understanding corporate characteristics related to board interlocks by considering both their number and mean value. Our findings suggest that board interlocks reduce audit risk by decreasing corporate uncertainty and information asymmetry. Therefore, in the future, it may be necessary to establish standards or guidelines for utilizing board interlocks in corporate governance.

참고문헌 (40)

  1. 권수영, "발생액의 질이 감사시간 및 감사보수에 미치는 영향에 관현 연구", 회계학연구, 36(4), pp.95~137 (2011)
  2. 김요환, "기업지배구조와 감사품질, 경영성과의 관련성에 대한 실증연구", 국제회계연구, (37), pp.95~120 (2011), 한국국제회계학회[DOI]
  3. 남현정, "물류기업의 이사회 구조와 기업가치 사이의 관계", 물류학회지, 25(4), pp.51~63 (2015), 한국물류학회
  4. 박종일, "기업지배구조가 비정상 감사보수와 감사시간에 미치는 영향", 세무와회계저널, 12(1), pp.191~227 (2011), 한국세무학회
  5. 박종일, "비정상 감사보수와 감사시간이 재량적 발생액에 미치는 영향", 회계와 감사연구, (45), pp.119~159 (2007)
  6. 박종일, "감사인의 감사보수 및 시간당 감사보수의 증가가 정보이용자에게 문제가 되는가? 신용평가기관과 채권투자자로부터의 실증적 증거", 회계ㆍ세무와 감사 연구, 64(3), pp.143~195 (2022), 한국공인회계사회[DOI]
  7. 박종일, "비정상적인 감사보수와 감사시간이 재량적 발생액에 미치는 영향", 세무와회계저널, 10(3), pp.265~301 (2009), 한국세무학회
  8. 손평식, "지배구조와 감사보수와의 관계에 관한 실증연구", 대한경영학회지, 20(6), pp.2667~2686 (2007), 대한경영학회
  9. 전규안, "회계이익과 과세소득의 차이와 발생액 정보가 감사시간과 감사보수에 미치는 영향", 경영학연구, 38(2), pp.319~350 (2009), 한국경영학회
  10. 정현욱, "비정상감사시간과 거래량 간의 관련성에 대한 연구", 회계ㆍ세무와 감사 연구, 57(2), pp.1~30 (2015), 한국공인회계사회[DOI]
  11. 최정호, "기업지배구조와 감사보수 및 감사시간의 관련성 분석", 회계정보연구, 26(1), pp.59~77 (2008), 한국회계정보학회
  12. Beckman, C. M., "The history of corporate networks : Expanding intellectual diversity and the role of Stanford affiliations", Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 28, pp.119~143 (2010)
  13. Beckman, C. M., "Network learning : The effects of partners’heterogeneity of experience on corporate acquisitions", Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(1), pp.92~124 (2002)
  14. Burris, V., "Interlocking directorates and political cohesion among corporate elites", American Journal of Sociology, 111(1), pp.249~283 (2005)
  15. Carpenter, M. A., "The strategic context of external network ties : Examining the impact of director appointments on board involvement in strategic decision making", Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), pp.639~660 (2001)
  16. Chin-Huat, O., "An exploratory study on interlocking directorates in listed firms in Singapore", Corporate Governance:An International Review, 11(4), pp.322~334 (2003)
  17. Choi, J. H., "Do abnormally high audit fees impair audit quality?", Auditing : a journal of practice & theory, 29(2), pp.115~140 (2010)
  18. Connelly, B. L., "More than adopters:Competing influences in the interlocking directorate", Organization Science, 22(3), pp.688~703 (2011)
  19. DeAngelo, L. E., "Auditor size and audit quality", Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3), pp.183~199 (1981)
  20. DeFond, M. L., "Do non-audit service fees impair auditor independence? Evidence from going concern audit opinions", Journal of Accounting Research, 40(4), pp.1247~1274 (2002)
  21. Dye, R. A., "Informationally motivated auditor replacement", Journal of Accounting and Economics, 14(4), pp.347~374 (1991)
  22. Haunschild, P. R., "When do interlocks matter? : Alternate sources of information and interlock influence", Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(4), pp.815~844 (1998)
  23. Haynes, K. T., "The effect of board capital and CEO power on strategic change", Strategic Management Journal, 31(11), pp.1145~1163 (2010)
  24. Howard, M. D., "Knowledge dependence and the formation of director interlocks", Academy of Management Journal, 60(5), pp.1986~2013 (2017)
  25. Ivanova, M. N., "The effects of board interlocks with an allegedly fraudulent company on audit fees", Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 38(2), pp.271~301 (2023)
  26. Johansen, T. R., "The impact of board interlocks on auditor choice and audit fees", Corporate Governance:An International Review, 21(3), pp.287~310 (2013)
  27. Koenig, T., "Interlocking corporate directorships as a social network", American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 40(1), pp.37~50 (1981)
  28. Lu, J., "Board interlocks and greenhouse gas emissions", Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(1), pp.92~108 (2021)
  29. Luffarelli, J., "The impact of indirect corporate social performance signals on firm value : Evidence from an event study", Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(3), pp.295~310 (2018)
  30. Mizruchi, M. S., "What do interlocks do? An analysis, critique, and assessment of research on interlocking directories", Annual Review of Sociology, 22, pp.271~298 (1996)
  31. Pfeffer, J., "External control of organizations-Resource dependence perspective", Organizational Behavior, 2, pp.373~388 (2015)
  32. Renneboog, L., "Director networks and takeovers", Journal of Corporate Finance, 28, pp.218~234 (2014)
  33. Schoorman, F. D., "Interlocking directorates : A strategy for reducing environmental uncertainty", Academy of Management Review, 6(2), pp.243~251 (1981)
  34. Shipilov, A. V., "The missing link : The effect of customers on the formation of relationships among producers in the multiplex triads", Organization Science, 23, pp.472~491 (2012)
  35. Shropshire, C., "The role of the interlocking director and board receptivity in the diffusion of practices", Academy of Management Review, 35, pp.246~264 (2010)
  36. Sun, W., "Board interlocks and the diffusion of CSR reporting practices : The role of market development", Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(3), pp.1333~1343 (2020)
  37. Westphal, J. D., "The strategic impetus for social network ties : Reconstituting broken CEO friendship ties", Strategic Management Journal, 27(5), pp.425~445 (2006)
  38. Xia, L., "Board Interlock Networks and Corporate Low-Carbon Innovation in China:Does Position Matter?", IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, pp.1~18 (2023)
  39. Zajac, E. J., "Who shall succeed? How CEO", board preferences and power affect the choice of new CEOs, 1996, pp.39(1), 64~90
  40. Zona, F., "Board interlocks and firm performance : Toward a combined agency-resource dependence perspective", Journal of Management, 44(2), pp.589~618 (2015)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)