본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

옛 전남도청별관 갈등과 '5·18'의 의미 탐색

Conflicts on the Old Annex to Provincial Hall of Jeollanam-do and Searching for the Meaning of 'the May 5·18'

2

조회

0

다운로드

7

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This paper analyzed the conflict of preserving or removing the Old Annex to Provincial Hall of Jeollanam-do, which occurred during the 'Hub City of Asian Culture, Gwangju Project'. The Old Annex to Provincial Hall of Jeollanam-do is a historic icon which symbolizes memories and experiences of the May 18 Peoples' Uprising. Through the dispute between preserving the original landmark and destroying it, this paper looked for the meaning of Gwangju and its 1980 protests in the light of the present. The two groups were opposed to each other: insisting 'historical value' or 'realistic regional development', respectively. Each position began to take shape as 'preservation=defending the spirit of May' and 'demolition=achieving economic welfare'. The characteristic of their arguments became more invisible and each claimed to make Gwangju as a place to learn democracy and a city to develop its economy through culture. This shows that the symbolic building of the May 18 Democratic Uprising is a social space of diverse meanings and interests rather then a place of united memory and experience. The debate surrounding the historical symbol progressed into making a choice between two extremes: democratic city paradigm and industrialism paradigm, two antagonistic ideologies running through 'Hub City of Asian Culture, Gwangju Project'. Therefore, it was difficult to find a compromise. Considering the circumstances, the May 18 in Gwangju is expected to find its meaning and status as 'historical value' and 'economic interests' competing against each other with 'culture' being the apex.

Abstract

This paper analyzed the conflict of preserving or removing the Old Annex to Provincial Hall of Jeollanam-do, which occurred during the 'Hub City of Asian Culture, Gwangju Project'. The Old Annex to Provincial Hall of Jeollanam-do is a historic icon which symbolizes memories and experiences of the May 18 Peoples' Uprising. Through the dispute between preserving the original landmark and destroying it, this paper looked for the meaning of Gwangju and its 1980 protests in the light of the present. The two groups were opposed to each other: insisting 'historical value' or 'realistic regional development', respectively. Each position began to take shape as 'preservation=defending the spirit of May' and 'demolition=achieving economic welfare'. The characteristic of their arguments became more invisible and each claimed to make Gwangju as a place to learn democracy and a city to develop its economy through culture. This shows that the symbolic building of the May 18 Democratic Uprising is a social space of diverse meanings and interests rather then a place of united memory and experience. The debate surrounding the historical symbol progressed into making a choice between two extremes: democratic city paradigm and industrialism paradigm, two antagonistic ideologies running through 'Hub City of Asian Culture, Gwangju Project'. Therefore, it was difficult to find a compromise. Considering the circumstances, the May 18 in Gwangju is expected to find its meaning and status as 'historical value' and 'economic interests' competing against each other with 'culture' being the apex.

참고문헌 (23)

  1. 광주광역시, "전남도청 이전 대비 광주발전전략연구" (2001)
  2. 김기곤, "5월행사의 의미변화와 ‘5.18의 문화화’", 지역사회학, 11(1), pp.171~201 (2009), 지역사회학회
  3. 김기곤, "문화도시의 구성과 공간정치 연구", 박사, 사회학과, pp.2008
  4. 나간채, "5월운동에 있어서 운동주체의 형성과 발전과정 분석", 민주주의와 인권, 8(2), pp.5~45 (2008), 5.18연구소
  5. 노대명, "앙리 르페브르의 ‘공간생산이론’에 대한 고찰", 공간과 사회, (14), pp.36~62 (2000), 한국공간환경학회
  6. 문화관광부, "아시아문화중심도시 조성 종합계획" (2007)
  7. 박선웅, "시민사회의 미디어 담론과 이데올로기", 현상과 인식, 29(1), pp.154~180 (2005), 한국인문사회과학회
  8. 백원담, "5·18, 어떻게 계승해야 하나", 아시아문화중심도시 시민대토론회 자료집 (2005), 문화중심도시조성위원회·문화관광부·광주광역시
  9. 양강섭, "5·18단체가 바라본 5·18공간 연계방안", 문화중심도시조성위원회·문화관광부·광주광역시 (2005)
  10. 오월성역화를 위한 시민연대모임, "진실은 발자국에 고여 있다" (1994)
  11. 이기현, "미디올로지. in: 사회적 상상과 매체문화" (2003), 한울
  12. 장세룡, "앙리 르페브르와 공간의 생산 - 역사이론적 ‘전유’의 모색 -", 역사와경계, (58), pp.293~325 (2006), 부산경남사학회
  13. 정근식, "문화에 기반한 국가균형발전의 의미와 중요성", 문화관광의 눈으로 본 국가균형발전 한국문화관광정책연구원 개원 2주년 기념 심포지엄 자료집 (2004)
  14. 정근식, "기억의 문화, 기념물과 역사교육", 역사교육, (97), pp.277~305 (2006), 역사교육연구회
  15. 정근식, "아시아문화중심도시 조성과 기억논쟁", 황해문화, (62) (2009), 새얼문화재단
  16. 정호기, "기념관 건립운동의 변화와 동화민주화운동 기념관들을 중심으로", 경제와 사회, (65), pp.226~250 (2005), 비판사회학회
  17. 정호기, "‘5·18’의 기억과 계승, 그리고 제도화. in: 5·18민중항쟁에 대한 새로운 성찰적 시선" (2009), 한울아카데미
  18. Kern, S., "시간과 공간의 문화사 1880~1918" (2004), 휴머니스트
  19. Lefebvre, H., "The Production of Space 1991" (1974), Blackwell
  20. Lefebvre, H., "현대세계의 일상성" (1990), 세계일보사
  21. Soja, E. W., "공간과 비판사회이론. in: 시각과 언어" (1997), Vision and Language Publisher
  22. Valentine, G., "사회지리학" (2009), 논형
  23. Wuthnow, R., "문화분석" (2003), 한울아카데미

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)