본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

지역사회복지계획과 의사결정의 자율성

Community welfare planning and the autonomy of decision-making

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This study aims to gauge the applicability of autonomy‘s priciples to the process of community welfare planning with an emphasis on peoples who lack mental capacity, which means they have a need for a supported–decesion making in this article. In order to do this, first the present study established a framework and criteria for analyzing the contents of 4 community welfare plan. And then evaluated the level of autonomy with a selected indices. The fihdings revealed that social welfare service law, guidelines have the possibility of guiding the autonomy through using the term like dignity, happiness, self-determination, representation response, feedback. But any plans didn’t identify and meet the need of autonomy or for a suported decision-making, although the deliverative poll methods like FGI, reach-out presentation was used. To conclude, we can say that all the plans in analysis lack of the clarity and organization from the views of autonomy. Based on these results, we suggested a impoverishment strategy including the guidelines' upgrading, planner's obligation, community welfare organization and community's role respectively. This study was a first attempt to review and assess the community planning’s process and contents from autompmy’s perspectives.

Abstract

This study aims to gauge the applicability of autonomy‘s priciples to the process of community welfare planning with an emphasis on peoples who lack mental capacity, which means they have a need for a supported–decesion making in this article. In order to do this, first the present study established a framework and criteria for analyzing the contents of 4 community welfare plan. And then evaluated the level of autonomy with a selected indices. The fihdings revealed that social welfare service law, guidelines have the possibility of guiding the autonomy through using the term like dignity, happiness, self-determination, representation response, feedback. But any plans didn’t identify and meet the need of autonomy or for a suported decision-making, although the deliverative poll methods like FGI, reach-out presentation was used. To conclude, we can say that all the plans in analysis lack of the clarity and organization from the views of autonomy. Based on these results, we suggested a impoverishment strategy including the guidelines' upgrading, planner's obligation, community welfare organization and community's role respectively. This study was a first attempt to review and assess the community planning’s process and contents from autompmy’s perspectives.

참고문헌 (47)

  1. 강대선, "지역사회복지계획 논리구성의 타당성과 질 강화 -경주시 지역사회복지계획 사례중심-", 한국사회복지학, 64(3), pp.155~181 (2012), 한국사회복지학회
  2. 강현수, "도시에 대한 권리-도시의 주인은 누구인가" (2010), 책세상
  3. 남양주시, "제2기 남양주시지역사회복지계획", U쾌한 남양주지역사회복지협의체ㆍ남양주시, ~ (2010)
  4. 류기형, "지역사회복지에 있어서 주민참여의 확대방안", 사회복지연구, 13, pp.35~65 (2004)
  5. 백승흠, "민법개정안의 성년후견제도와 피후견인의 신상보호", 법학논고, 35(35), pp.53~80 (2011), 법학연구원
  6. 제2기 지역사회복지계획 수립 매뉴얼(시ㆍ군ㆍ구용), "보건복지가족부", 보건복지가족부, ~ (2009)
  7. 제3기 지역사회복지계획 수립 매뉴얼(시ㆍ군ㆍ구, 시·도), "보건복지부·한국보건사회연구원·한국보건복지인력개발원", 보건복지가족부, ~ (2013)
  8. 김용득, "한국장애인복지의 이해", pp.123~170 (2007), 인간과복지
  9. 신권철, "성년후견제도와 사회복지제도의 연계" (2013), 집문당
  10. 안산시, "제2기 안산시지역사회복지계획수립(2011-2014)" (2010), 안산시ㆍ안산시지역사회복지협의체
  11. 영도구, "영도구 제2기 지역사회복지계획(2011-2014 : 4개년)", ~ (2010)
  12. 이명현, "계약형 사회복지와 권리옹호시스템" (2008), 집문당
  13. 이민홍, "한국노인의 연구참여를 위한 동의능력평가척도의 타당성 연구", 한국사회복지학, 61(3), pp.55~76 (2009), 한국사회복지학회
  14. 이선우, "장애인복지의 이론과 실제" (2009), 집문당
  15. 익산시, "제2기 익산시지역사회복지계획(2011-2014)", ~ (2010)
  16. 임성택, "사회복지사업법의 쟁점-사회복지서비스 신청권을 중심으로", 사회복지법제연구, (창간), pp.75~100 (2010)
  17. 제철웅, "영국법에서 의사결정무능력 성인의 보호제도의 역사적 전개와 2005년의 정신능력법의 특징", 비교사법, 17(4), pp.215~278 (2010), 한국비교사법학회
  18. 제철웅, "요보호성인의 인권존중의 관점에서 본 새로운 성년후견제도: 그 특징, 문제점 그리고 개선방안", 민사법학, 56, pp.277~331 (2011), 한국민사법학회
  19. 최현, "인권" (2008), 책세상
  20. Cooke, M., "Five arguments for deliberative democracy", Political Studies, 48, pp.947~969 (2000)
  21. Copmton, B. R., "Social Work Processes" (1984), Dorsey Press
  22. Department for Constitutional Affairs, "Mental Capacity Act 2005: Code of Practice" (2007), TSO
  23. Ekstrom, L. W., "Personal Autonomy: New Essays on Personal Autonomy and Its Role in Comtemporary Moral Philosophy", pp.143~161 (2005), Cambridge University Press
  24. Fishkin, J.S., "Experimenting with a democratic ideal : Deliberative polling and public opinion", Acta Politica, 30(3), pp.284~298 (2005)
  25. Frankfurt, H. G., "Freedom of the will and the concept of a person", The Journal of Philosophy, 68(1), pp.5~20 (1971)
  26. Frey, B. S., "Not for the Money : An Economic Theory of Personal Motivation" (1997), Elgar
  27. Glaeser, E. L., "Paternalism and psychology", University of Chicago Law Review, 73(1), pp.32~38 (2006)
  28. Goldman, B. M., "The role of authenticity in healthy psychological functioning and subjective well-being", Annals of the American Psychotherapy Association, 5(6), pp.18~20 (2002)
  29. Harbermas, J., "Reconciliation through the public use of reason", Journal of Philosophy, XCII(3), pp.109~131 (1995)
  30. Henderson, S., "Influence on patient participation and decision-making in care", Nursing Research and Practice, 17(9), pp.521~525 (2002)
  31. Kim, S. Y. H., "Impaired decision-making ability in subjects with alzheimer's disease and willingness to participate in research", Am J Psychiatry, 159(5), pp.797~802 (2002)
  32. Korsggard, C. M., "The Sources of Normativity" (1996), Cambridge University Press
  33. The need for autonomy, "Naquin, P. J.", Louisiana Tech University in partial fulfillment of Master of Arts, ~ (2003)
  34. Ryan, R. M., "Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Development Perspectives on Motivation", pp.1~56 (1993), University of Nebraska Press
  35. Ryan, R. M., "Self-regulation and the problem of human autonomy : Does psychology need choice, self-determination, and will?", Journal of personality, 74(6), pp.1557~1586 (2006)
  36. Ryan, R. M., "On the interpersonal regulation of emotion : Emotional reliance across gender, relationship, and cultures", Personal Relationship, 12, pp.145~163 (2005)
  37. Sainio, C., "Cancer patients' decision-making regarding treatment and nursing care", Journal of Advanced Nursing, 41(3), pp.250~260 (2003)
  38. Samah, A. A., "The theoretical and conceptual framework and application of community empowerment and participation in processes of community development in malaysia", Journal of American Science, 7(2), pp.186~195 (2011)
  39. Sen, A, "Development as freedom" (1999), Knopf
  40. Thelen, M., "End-of-life decision making in intensive care", Criticalcare nurse, 25(6), pp.28~38 (2005)
  41. Dworkin, G., "The Theory and Practice Autonomy" (1988), Cambridge University Press
  42. "2012년 지방자치단체 복지정책 평가" (2012), 보건복지부[URL]
  43. "사회복지사업법, 2013. 10. 7" (2013)[URL]
  44. "Self-determination and person-directed support)" (1996)[URL]
  45. "Supported decision-making forum" (2010)[URL]
  46. "Empowerment in Practice: Analysis and Implementation" (2007)[URL]
  47. "Guidelines for Conducting Incapability Assessment for the Guardianship Applications" (2005)[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)