Promoting and improving three Rs practice: the Korean guidelines
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Scientists planning research that involves the use of animals are required to examine the possibilities for replacement, reduction, or refinement (the Three Rs), and their protocol must be reviewed by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Good scientific practice involving appropriate search techniques on the available Three Rs resources is essential for both ethical and scientific reasons. Appropriate experimental design and statistical analysis techniques are particularly necessary for research involving the use of animals, because this can improve animal welfare and scientific outcomes, as well as saving animal lives. There are a number of resources to help researchers improve their search techniques, experimental design strategies, and their reporting of research involving the use of animals. However, there is little specific information or resources on the Three Rs alternatives that is readily available in the Korean language. This paper outlines the common errors made by submitting researchers that have been repeatedly observed during the ethical review of experimental protocols over the last ten years, and provides information on the Korean resources available to promote good scientific practice. This could help to bridge the gap between Korean scientists and animal welfare advocates assisting scientists to improve ethical considerations and conduct responsible research.
Abstract
Scientists planning research that involves the use of animals are required to examine the possibilities for replacement, reduction, or refinement (the Three Rs), and their protocol must be reviewed by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Good scientific practice involving appropriate search techniques on the available Three Rs resources is essential for both ethical and scientific reasons. Appropriate experimental design and statistical analysis techniques are particularly necessary for research involving the use of animals, because this can improve animal welfare and scientific outcomes, as well as saving animal lives. There are a number of resources to help researchers improve their search techniques, experimental design strategies, and their reporting of research involving the use of animals. However, there is little specific information or resources on the Three Rs alternatives that is readily available in the Korean language. This paper outlines the common errors made by submitting researchers that have been repeatedly observed during the ethical review of experimental protocols over the last ten years, and provides information on the Korean resources available to promote good scientific practice. This could help to bridge the gap between Korean scientists and animal welfare advocates assisting scientists to improve ethical considerations and conduct responsible research.
참고문헌 (24)
- Choe BI, "Progress and Challenges of the 3Rs Resource Platform in Korea: The way forward", WC10 Poster presentation (2017)
- 최병인, "Searching and review on the Three Rs information in Korea: time for quality assessment and continued education", BMB Reports, 46(7), pp.335~337 (2013), 생화학분자생물학회
- Kilkenny C, "Survey of the Quality of Experimental Design, Statistical Analysis and Reporting of Research Using Animals", PLoS One, 4, pp.e7824~ (2009)
- Anderson LC, "Institutional and IACUC Responsibilities for Animal Care and Use Education and Training Programs", ILAR J, 48, pp.90~95 (2007)
- Nesdill D, "Literature search strategies to comply with institutional animal care and use committee review requirements", J Vet Med Educ, 38, pp.150~156 (2011)
- Leenaars M, "Assessing the search for and implementation of the Three Rs: a survey among scientists", Altern Lab Anim, 37, pp.297~303 (2009)
- Leenaars M, "A step-by-step guide to systematically identified all relevant animal studies", Lab Anim, 46, pp.24~31 (2012)
- "The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique" (1959)[URL]
- Choe BI, "Korean Translation of the Three Rs and the Humanity Criterion", Altern Lab Anim, 44, pp.515~517 (2016)
- van Luijk J, "Assessing the search for information on Three Rs methods, and their subsequent implementation: a national survey among scientists in the Netherlands", Altern Lab Anim, 39, pp.429~447 (2011)
- "European Union Reference Laboratory for alternatives to animal testing (EURL ECVAM)"[URL]
- Hudson-Shore M, "Searching Effectively for Three Rs information", Altern Lab Anim, 40, pp.22~23 (2012)
- Kilkenny C, "Improving bioscience research reporting: The ARRIVE Guidelines for Reporting Animal Research", PLoS Biol, 8, pp.e1000412~ (2010)
- "NC3Rs"[URL]
- "The ARRIVE guidelines: speaker notes"[URL]
- 최병인, "Individual and collective responsibility to enhance regulatory compliance of the Three Rs", BMB Reports, 47(4), pp.179~183 (2014), 생화학분자생물학회
- Hooijmans CR, "A gold standard publication checklist to improve the quality of animal studies, to fully integrate the Three Rs, and to make systematic reviews more feasible", Altern Lab Anim, 38, pp.167~182 (2010)
- Smith AJ, "PREPARE: guidelines for planning animal research and testing", Lab Anim (2017)
- "Norecopa"[URL]
- "Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency"[URL]
- "Korean Association for Laboratory Animals"[URL]
- "Animal Protection Act"[URL]
- "Laboratory Animal Act"[URL]
- "BIC Study"[URL]