Argo 플로트와 표류부이 관측자료를 활용한 기상청 전지구 해양모델 (NEMO)의 검증: 최신 미해군 해양모델(HYCOM)과 비교
Verification of the KMA Ocean Model NEMO against Argo Floats and Drift Buoys: a Comparison with the Up-to-date US Navy HYCOM
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper describes verification results for the ocean analysis field produced by the Nucleus for European Modelling of the Ocean (NEMO) of the Korea Meteorological Administration (KMA) against observed Argo floats and drift buoys over the western Pacific Ocean and the equatorial Pacific during 2020~2021. This is confirmed by a comparison of the verification for the newly updated version of the HYbrid Coordinate Ocean Model/Navy Coupled Ocean Data Assimilation (HYCOM/NCODA) against same observations. NEMO shows that the vertical ocean temperature is much closer to the Argo floats than HYCOM for most seasons in terms of bias and root mean square error. On the other hand, there are overall considerable cold biases for HYCOM, which may be due to the more rapid decreasing temperature at the shallow thermocline in HYCOM. Conclusion demonstrated that the NEMO analysis for ocean temperature is more reliable than the analysis produced by the latest version of HYCOM as well as by the out-of-date HYCOM applied to the precedent study. The surface ocean current produced by NEMO also shows 14% closer to the AOML (Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory) in situ drift buoys observations than HYCOM over the western Pacific Ocean. Over the equatorial Pacific, however, HYCOM shows slightly closer to AOML observation than NEMO in some seasons. Overall, this study suggests that the resulting information may be used to promote more use of NEMO analysis.
Abstract
This paper describes verification results for the ocean analysis field produced by the Nucleus for European Modelling of the Ocean (NEMO) of the Korea Meteorological Administration (KMA) against observed Argo floats and drift buoys over the western Pacific Ocean and the equatorial Pacific during 2020~2021. This is confirmed by a comparison of the verification for the newly updated version of the HYbrid Coordinate Ocean Model/Navy Coupled Ocean Data Assimilation (HYCOM/NCODA) against same observations. NEMO shows that the vertical ocean temperature is much closer to the Argo floats than HYCOM for most seasons in terms of bias and root mean square error. On the other hand, there are overall considerable cold biases for HYCOM, which may be due to the more rapid decreasing temperature at the shallow thermocline in HYCOM. Conclusion demonstrated that the NEMO analysis for ocean temperature is more reliable than the analysis produced by the latest version of HYCOM as well as by the out-of-date HYCOM applied to the precedent study. The surface ocean current produced by NEMO also shows 14% closer to the AOML (Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory) in situ drift buoys observations than HYCOM over the western Pacific Ocean. Over the equatorial Pacific, however, HYCOM shows slightly closer to AOML observation than NEMO in some seasons. Overall, this study suggests that the resulting information may be used to promote more use of NEMO analysis.
참고문헌 (15)
- Neil Barton, "The Navy's Earth System Prediction Capability: A New Global Coupled Atmosphere‐Ocean‐Sea Ice Prediction System Designed for Daily to Subseasonal Forecasting", Earth and Space Science, 8(4) (2021), American Geophysical Union (AGU)[DOI]
- Bonjean, F., "Diagnostic model and analysis of the surface currents in the tropical Pacific Ocean", J. Phys. Oceanogr, 32, pp.2938~2954 (2002)
- 장필훈, "기상청 전지구 해양자료동화시스템(GODAPS): 개요 및 검증", 대기, 31(2), pp.229~240 (2021), 한국기상학회[DOI]
- Gaspar, P., "A simple eddy kinetic energy model for simulations of the oceanic vertical mixing : Tests at station Papa and longterm upper ocean study site", J. Geophys. Res. Oceans, 95, pp.16179~16193 (1990)
- 정영윤, "기상청 계절예측시스템(GloSea5)의 해양성층 강화시기단기 해양예측 정확도 및 대기 - 해양 접합효과", 대기, 26(4), pp.599~615 (2016), 한국기상학회
- 정명일, "GloSea5 모형의 6개월 장기 기후 예측성 검증", 대기, 25(2), pp.323~337 (2015), 한국기상학회
- 김영호, "한국의 해양예측, 오늘과 내일", 바다, 18(2), pp.89~103 (2013), 한국해양학회
- 고은별, "기상청 전지구 해양순환예측시스템(NEMO", NEMOVAR)과 미해군 해양자료동화시스템(HYCOM, 대기, pp.2018, 28(1)[DOI]
- Large, W. G., "Oceanic vertical mixing : A review and a model with a nonlocal boundary layer parameterization", Rev. Geophys, 32, pp.363~403 (1994)
- 이효미, "고해상도 기후예측시스템의 표층해류 예측성능 평가", Ocean and Polar Research, 40(3), pp.99~114 (2018), 한국해양과학기술원
- 이상민, "2014년 계절예측시스템과 중기예측모델의 예측성능 비교 및 검증", 대기, 26(1), pp.59~72 (2016), 한국기상학회
- Madec, G., "NEMO ocean engine", Note du Pole de mod ˆ elisation de l’Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace, (27), pp.386~ (2008)
- Lokesh Kumar Pandey, "Comparing the Performance of Turbulent Kinetic Energy and K-Profile Parameterization Vertical Parameterization Schemes over the Tropical Indian Ocean", Marine Geodesy, 44(1), pp.42~69 (2020), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
- Qui, B., "Mean flow and variability in the Kuroshio Extension from Geosat altimetry data", J. Geophys. Res, 96, pp.18491~18507 (1991)
- Yang Yang, "On the Seasonal Eddy Variability in the Kuroshio Extension", Journal of Physical Oceanography, 48(8), pp.1675~1689 (2018), American Meteorological Society[DOI]