대기 중 온실가스 농도 관측 장비 성능 비교 검증
Assessment of Atmospheric Greenhouse Gas Concentration Equipment Performance
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study evaluates three distinct observation methods, CRDS, OA-ICOS, and OFCEAS,in greenhouse gas monitoring equipment for atmospheric CO2 and CH4 concentrations. The assessment encompasses fundamental performance, high-concentration measurement accuracy,calibration methods, and the impact of atmospheric humidity on measurement accuracy. Results indicate that within a range of approximately 500 ppm, all three devices demonstratehigh accuracy and linearity. However, beyond 1000 ppm, CO2 accuracy sharply declines (84%),emphasizing the need for caution when interpreting high-concentration CO2 data. An analysis ofcalibration methods reveals that both CO2 and CH4 measurements achieve high accuracy andlinearity through 1-point calibration, suggesting that multi-point calibration is not imperative forprecision. In dynamic atmospheric conditions with significant CO2 and CH4 concentration variations,a 1-point calibration suffices for reliable data (99% accuracy). The evaluation of humidityimpact demonstrates that humidity removal devices significantly reduce air moisture levels, yetthis has a negligible effect on dry CO2 concentrations (less than 0.5% relative error). All threeobservation method instruments, which have integrated humidity correction to calculate dry CO2concentrations, exhibit minor sensitivity to humidity removal devices, implying that additionalremoval devices may not be essential. Consequently, this study offers valuable insights for comparingdata from different measurement devices and provides crucial information to consider inthe operation of monitoring sites.
Abstract
This study evaluates three distinct observation methods, CRDS, OA-ICOS, and OFCEAS,in greenhouse gas monitoring equipment for atmospheric CO2 and CH4 concentrations. The assessment encompasses fundamental performance, high-concentration measurement accuracy,calibration methods, and the impact of atmospheric humidity on measurement accuracy. Results indicate that within a range of approximately 500 ppm, all three devices demonstratehigh accuracy and linearity. However, beyond 1000 ppm, CO2 accuracy sharply declines (84%),emphasizing the need for caution when interpreting high-concentration CO2 data. An analysis ofcalibration methods reveals that both CO2 and CH4 measurements achieve high accuracy andlinearity through 1-point calibration, suggesting that multi-point calibration is not imperative forprecision. In dynamic atmospheric conditions with significant CO2 and CH4 concentration variations,a 1-point calibration suffices for reliable data (99% accuracy). The evaluation of humidityimpact demonstrates that humidity removal devices significantly reduce air moisture levels, yetthis has a negligible effect on dry CO2 concentrations (less than 0.5% relative error). All threeobservation method instruments, which have integrated humidity correction to calculate dry CO2concentrations, exhibit minor sensitivity to humidity removal devices, implying that additionalremoval devices may not be essential. Consequently, this study offers valuable insights for comparingdata from different measurement devices and provides crucial information to consider inthe operation of monitoring sites.
참고문헌 (25)
- Chen, L., "Strategies to achieve a carbon neutral society : a review", Environ. Chem. Lett, 20, pp.2277~2310 (2022)[DOI]
- Coumou, D., "A decade of weather extremes", Nature Climate Change, 2, pp.491~496 (2012)[DOI]
- Friedlingstein, P., "Global carbon budget 2019", Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 11, pp.1783~1838 (2019)[DOI]
- "G2301"[URL]
- Gao, Y., "Spatiotemporal variability of the Near-Surface CO2 concentration across an industrial-urban-rural transect, nanjing, China", Sci. Total Environ, 631, pp.1192~1200 (2018)[DOI]
- "GLA331-GGA: ABB-LGR Inc"[URL]
- "Licor Inc"[URL]
- McKain, K., "Assessment of Ground-Based atmospheric observations for verification of greenhouse gas emissions from an urban region", Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci, 109, pp.8423~8428 (2012)[DOI]
- Miyaoka, Y., "Diurnal and seasonal variations in Atmospheric CO2 in Sapporo, Japan : anthropogenic sources and biogenic sinks", Geochem. J, 41, pp.429~436 (2007)[DOI]
- Moore, J., "Seasonally varying contributions to urban CO2 in the Chicago, illinois, USA region : insights from a High-Resolution CO2concentration and 13C record", Elementa : Sci. Anthropocene, 3, pp.000052~ (2015)[DOI]
- Nangini, C., "A global dataset of CO2emissions and ancillary eata related to emissions for 343 cities", Sci. Data, 6, pp.1~29 (2019)[DOI]
- Pan, C., "Spatial variability of daytime CO2 concentration with landscape structure across urbanization gradients, Shanghai, China", Climate Res, 69, pp.107~116 (2016)[DOI]
- 박채린, "Challenges in Monitoring Atmospheric CO2 Concentrations in Seoul Using Low-Cost Sensors", Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 57(3), pp.547~553 (2021), 한국기상학회[DOI]
- Park, C., "Reduction in urban atmospheric CO2 enhancement in Seoul, South Korea, resulting from social distancing policies during the COVID-19 Pandemic", Atmos. Pollut. Res, 12, pp.101176~ (2021)[DOI]
- Park, C., "Comprehensive assessment of vertical variations in urban atmospheric CO2 concentrations by using tall tower measurement and an atmospheric transport model", Urban Climate, 45, pp.101283~ (2022)[DOI]
- Park, C., "Spatiotemporal variations in urban CO2 flux with Land-Use types in Seoul", Carbon Balance and Manag, 17, pp.1~14 (2022)[DOI]
- Park, C., "Machine learning based estimation of urban on-road CO2 concentration in Seoul", Environ. Res, 231, pp.116256~ (2023)[DOI]
- Shusterman, A. A., "The BErkeley atmospheric CO2 observation network : initial evaluation", Atmos. Chem. Phys, 16, pp.13449~13463 (2016)[DOI]
- Sim, S., "Co-Benefit potential of urban CO2 and air quality monitoring : a study on the first mobile campaign and building monitoring experiments in Seoul during the winter", Atmos. Pollut. Res, 11, pp.1963~1970 (2020)[DOI]
- Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis: Working Group I Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, "Stocker, T", Cambridge university press, 1535~ (2014)
- Sugawara, H., "Anthropogenic CO2emissions changes in an urban area of Tokyo, Japan, due to the COVID-19 pandemic: a case study during the state of emergency in April-May 2020", Geophys. Res. Lett, 48, pp.e2021GL092~ (2020)[DOI]
- Takano, T., "Spatial variations in daytime methane and carbon dioxide emissions in two urban landscapes, Sakai, Japan", Urban Climate, 36, pp.100798~ (2021)[DOI]
- Verhulst, K. R., "Carbon dioxide and methane measurements from the Los Angeles megacity carbon Project–Part 1 : calibration, urban enhancements, and uncertainty estimates", Atmos. Chem. Phys, 17, pp.8313~8341 (2017)[DOI]
- Xueref-Remy, I., "Diurnal, synoptic and seasonal variability of atmospheric CO2 in the Paris megacity area", Atmos. Chem. Phys, 18, pp.3335~3362 (2018)[DOI]